Kidman & Eckhart down the Rabbit Hole

Posted on 04/03/09 48 Comments

eckhart-kidman

THR tells us Aaron Eckhart is in negotiations to play Nicole Kidman’s husband in David Lindsay-Abaire’s Pulitzer prize-winning play, Rabbit Hole, as a couple whose lives are disrupted by tragedy.

The play focuses on a couple, Becca and Howie, trying to cope with the death of their only child, a four-year-old, in an auto accident, while Becca’s well-meaning mom and off-kilter sister attempt to lift their spirits (and deal with their own problems), each in her own inimitable way. The couple’s lives are further complicated when the young driver who killed their son contacts them seeking closure as well. (Wiki)

“An intensely emotional examination of grief, laced with wit, insightfulness, compassion and searing honesty . . . an uncommonly affecting and absorbing play.” - Variety

“The sad, sweet release of Rabbit Hole lies precisely in the access it allows to the pain of others. . . . This anatomy of grief [taps] a reservoir of feelings common to anyone who has experienced the vacuum left by a death in the family.” - The New York Times

As interesting as the casting news may be, the most intriguing part of package, for me, is the involvement of director John Cameron Mitchell (Hedwig and Angry Inch, Shortbus). Gay directors have guided Nicole Kidman to her best performances in The Hours and To Die For.

Other posts you might like

47 Comments

  1. 1

    Christopher King says:
    Friday, April 3, 2009 at 10:45am

    I don’t usually say this, but I’m sad the Broadway cast didn’t get the movie.
    Cynthia Nixon was brilliant as well as Tyne Daily. I think it might have been Cynthia’s breakthru.
    Now we get to see the Botox Queen try to force herself to make facial expressions.
    Kudo’s on Eckhart though. He’s dreamy.

  2. 2

    Alfredo - Year One says:
    Friday, April 3, 2009 at 11:19am

    “Gay directors have guided Nicole Kidman to her best performances in The Hours and To Die For.”

    Don’t forget Amenabar with The Others

  3. 3

    Ryan Adams says:
    Friday, April 3, 2009 at 11:22am

    How did I not know Amenabar is gay? :roll:

  4. 4

    Pierre de Plume says:
    Friday, April 3, 2009 at 11:37am

    I’m optimistic about the casting choices.

  5. 5

    Jack Mort says:
    Friday, April 3, 2009 at 11:39am

    Who gives a damn if the directors are homosexuals.

  6. 6

    jlu says:
    Friday, April 3, 2009 at 1:44pm

    technically, i think daldry considers himself bisexual. at least, according to his wikipedia page.

    but i agree, who cares?

    it would be absurd to think that kidman could only pull of a good performance if her male director goes for guys.

  7. 7

    Yvette says:
    Friday, April 3, 2009 at 2:01pm

    You would have to pay me to see this movie….too sad.

  8. 8

    Ed says:
    Friday, April 3, 2009 at 2:22pm

    Who gives a damn if the directors are homosexuals?
    Me, cause they always hold there camera’s so limp wristed.
    In all seriousness though, TLC would never have last as a network
    without an army of gay creativism.
    As far as this movie……It annoys me that Cynthia Nixon didn’t get the role. Big Hollywood tends to ruin most movies these days. That’s why it is refreshing to see someone take the path less taken every once in a while…..Or just watch independent films exclusively.

  9. 9

    Afrika says:
    Friday, April 3, 2009 at 2:23pm

    Yeah! NICOLE scores about meaty role. In yo face haterS!!!

    HI HATERS
    HI HATERS
    HI HATERS

  10. 10

    elias says:
    Friday, April 3, 2009 at 2:54pm

    Woody Allen and John Cameron Mitchell ?

    Which other Hollywood star would work with these great auteurs ?

    Kidman really is the one with the most interesting, diverse résumé

  11. 11

    Ed says:
    Friday, April 3, 2009 at 3:55pm

    How bad it could be……..
    Reece Witherspoon and Samuel L Jackson make this a comedy farce and a hollywood wash…..Yes there will be Chiuauas!
    “Rabbits, I don’t need no sticking Rabbits”….I’m just a tiny bit insane…Did mention that…..

  12. 12

    Becky says:
    Friday, April 3, 2009 at 4:36pm

    Daldry is married, or has a female partner. Happy to see Nicole
    with a meaty role. I hope this is her comeback. Some of her movies
    have been mediocre but I have never seen her give a bad performance. I am not sure John Cameron Mitchell is the right choice
    to direct this complex material.

  13. 13

    Anna says:
    Friday, April 3, 2009 at 5:57pm

    Afrika surely you’re not a genius.

    Cameron Mitchell-Kidman-Eckhart=Good Movie

  14. 14

    Afrika says:
    Friday, April 3, 2009 at 8:03pm

    Anna

    I never claimed to be one DARRRRR-LING!!!

    Have a good day. Cheers. :)

  15. 15

    Watermelons says:
    Friday, April 3, 2009 at 8:16pm

    Nicole is always dazzling (Australia and Bewitched!)

    but I wish Oscar winner for The Reader Kate Winslet had been cast and paired with somebody of the Paul Giamatti/Johnny Depp type for this movie.

  16. 16

    Wael says:
    Friday, April 3, 2009 at 9:43pm

    I hope Nicole Kidman does this role justice. Personally, I don’t see her having the temperament to play Becca. I love this play, have seen the Broadway production and know it pretty well and Becca is wry and intense, Nicole Kidman is icy and removed. Becca deals with her pain by suppressing it but still is very active and has a certain heat to her. That’s not Nicole Kidman but then again she had a certain heat in the Others so let’s see. Cynthia Nixon really was amazing.

  17. 17

    Afrika says:
    Friday, April 3, 2009 at 9:52pm

    Nicole is icy? she can’t play intense?

    child! did you watch The Hours? and dogville? and The Others? and To die for? need I go on? the list is inexhaustive so I could go on forever.

    Nicole’s latest flops is by no means a statement about her acting chops. Botox or no botox, the b*tch can crack up that emotion like no other.

    She got the part and she will prove the HATERS wrong!!

    hi haters!
    hi haters!
    hi haters!

  18. 18

    Wael says:
    Friday, April 3, 2009 at 10:04pm

    Oh Afrika, child Nicole is the queen of icy. I loved the hours and very much liked her performance in it but she excels at playing women trapped inside their own reality and that’s where she was with The hours, the others, Moulin Rouge, To Die for and that’s it(Going on is a waste of time, that’s Nicole Kidman’s Quartet of successful performances). She isn’t typically good at playing real down to earth housewife type characters and usually comes across as airy and removed which isn’t Becca.

    Please don’t get your panties all twisted up. Having an opinion about the kinds of roles someone should or shouldn’t play doesn’t automatically mean I hate her. The world isn’t quite so um…Black and white.

    Also, please remove the stones you have in your pockets. It isn’t that dire and Put down that pillow before you smother any children with it. OK child? ;-)

  19. 19

    Afrika says:
    Friday, April 3, 2009 at 10:15pm

    wael

    WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO SEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE- RIOUS?

    characters trapped inside their own reality? did you make that up? LMAO! so Virginia Woolf was trapped inside her own reality huh? LMAO

    child! Someone needs to save you from yourself.

  20. 20

    Wael says:
    Friday, April 3, 2009 at 10:30pm

    Yeah baby, she was. A brilliant woman going mad because she lived in a time when her ailment wasn’t understood, her life decided for her by a bunch of Victorian doctors. She wanted to be free and live in the city but her husband’s misguided notions of loving her was to imprison her in a country house where her most exciting and most frequent human interaction she had was with her service people none of whom understood her and she certainly couldn’t handle them. But that was her reality. She couldn’t take care of herself and eventually killed herself because she couldn’t deal with that reality. You know, the one she couldn’t get out of. I am talking about the movie here as there was more to Woolf’s life than that but yeah that was all there…

    You are so cute with the serious business. I winked at you. That should have been a cluuuuue.

  21. 21

    Chris says:
    Friday, April 3, 2009 at 11:00pm

    Um, I don’t mean to sound like a hater but Kidman didn’t get the part or land it or have someone cast her. Her production company bought the rights to the play and had Lindsay-Abaire adapt it into a screenplay. She’s the one calling the shots. Would the movie be made without her? Possibly… but probably not for theatrical release and not so soon after it won the Pulitzer. Kidman being in the movie is a reflection of the fact that she liked the part and wanted to play it, therefore snapping up the film rights before anyone else did.

  22. 22

    Wael says:
    Friday, April 3, 2009 at 11:03pm

    shhhh… Afrika will kill you…she can do the can can

    I look forward to seeing what happens with this movie.

    Praise be to Kidman. Or Kidmano Akbar as I like to say sometimes…not at airports though. Misunderstandings tend to ensue then.

  23. 23

    Afrika says:
    Friday, April 3, 2009 at 11:16pm

    Wael

    I’m a boy…not a she…and no! I won’t kill Chris. Nicole’s stellar performance will do the job for me ;)

  24. 24

    Alfredo - Year One says:
    Saturday, April 4, 2009 at 9:42am

    Afrika, are you a boy???? What man hetero is so obssesed with Penelope Cruz and Nicole Kidman?????

  25. 25

    Pauley says:
    Saturday, April 4, 2009 at 9:43am

    I can only hope that Winslet is never cast opposite the highly over-rated Giamatti. Though Winslet would be great in a film like this. Though I do like Kidman, and when paired with the right director can pull off amazing performances, i.e Dogville and Birth.

  26. 26

    haqyunus says:
    Saturday, April 4, 2009 at 1:05pm

    cynthia nixon has been robbed. it would have been her breakthru (as someone said earlier)

  27. 27

    AK says:
    Saturday, April 4, 2009 at 3:13pm

    I’m sorry but I just really dislike Nicole Kidman. She always comes across as an ice queen and I simply can’t connect to her onscreen.

  28. 28

    alois says:
    Saturday, April 4, 2009 at 3:33pm

    Margot at the wedding, Birth and Dogville are 3 performances that were overlooked in the last 5 years. She was amazing in them, but the Academy tends to snub female characters that you can’t feel pity for. That’s also what happens with To die for and to an extent, with Eyes Wide Shut.

    Kidman seems interested in playing complicated, non-easily likable characters and that’s more difficult for an actress, because you’re judged more harschly and people tend to associate the actress with the character.

    I am sure that she will get plenty of noms for this film because she’s very much a victim, and you can have sympathy for her.

  29. 29

    Nick K. says:
    Saturday, April 4, 2009 at 4:26pm

    I don’t know about you guys, but Nicole Kidman was great eye candy in “Batman Forever”. Hey, come to think of it, both these actors have been in Batman movies with Harvey Dent/ Two-face. Though I think Aaron Eckhart did a much much better job than Tommy Lee Jones. That was just like watching a train wreck in slo-mo. It was awful, but you couldn’t look away.

  30. 30

    VCB says:
    Saturday, April 4, 2009 at 6:27pm

    i wana cry… this sounds potent… just as as long as it doesn’t fizzle like “reservation road”

  31. 31

    ORDINARY COW says:
    Saturday, April 4, 2009 at 7:11pm

    you mean ‘revolutionary road’

  32. 32

    Wael says:
    Saturday, April 4, 2009 at 8:51pm

    alois, it doesn’t sound like you know anything about Rabbit Hole. It’s not a tearjerker and Becca comes across as less than sympathetic in many scenes and not at all a victim which makes it different than a seen this, watched that family tragedy. It’s really more about how families deal with their impacted grief after a tragic death of a child and how a husband and a wife’s very disparate ways of grieving pulls them in totally opposite directions.

    Also, Mary Tyler Moore came across as a very unlikable character and she still got nominated for an academy award. Your observation is not always true. The academy often doesn’t go for subtle but they do go for unlikable characters.

  33. 33

    Marianne says:
    Saturday, April 4, 2009 at 9:10pm

    I’m suspicious of this project. Nicole Kidman is in it. She’s a big flop walking. I see her name in the cast and I think: DANGER!!!!!!!
    I can’t think of any other “serious” actress with so many flops lined up in the last few years. Movies like Fur, Birthday Girl, Bewitched, Stepford Wives, Australia, The Human Stain, Birth, The Golden Compass and Australia weren’t just box office flops, but they’re also unwatchable. They’re just lame. Crap. I felt embarassed for Nicole, when I was watching all these pictures. I was like: how did she get involved with this s*it?
    There were few decent movies, like Margot at The Wedding, The Interpreter and Dogville, but they’re very far from perfect. And the best thing about Margot happened to be Jennifer Jason Leigh, and not Nicole. What about her Chanel contract? She was probably the worst Chanel No.5 girl in history. She was lame. Her presence in the ads was insipid and the tv spot was annoying.
    She’s not a bad actress. In the right projects, she can be pretty good. Moulin Rouge, The Others and To Die For are good examples of that. But she takes ages to find the right projects. While she doesn’t find them, she looks for great ways to ruin her career and reputation.
    If the bad movies weren’t enough, she joined the Botox club. Now she can’t move her forehead to save her life. Now she’s looking like a wax statue. What actress can expression emotions with her face totally numb from the effects of Botox?

  34. 34

    Flapp says:
    Saturday, April 4, 2009 at 9:16pm

    Nicole Kidman is in it. She’s a big actress and a big star. I see her name in the cast and I think: WONDERFUL!!!!!!!

  35. 35

    Afrika says:
    Saturday, April 4, 2009 at 9:45pm

    hi haters
    hi haters
    hi haters

  36. 36

    dela says:
    Saturday, April 4, 2009 at 10:56pm

    Box office wise, Nicole Kidman may not be in Jolie/Witherspoon/ Streep league but she gets a bad rap. Foreign box office returns of her last two movies far outstrip domestic grosses. Australia might not have been a blockbuster but it is far from a big flop people are calling it. The Golden Compass was at #13 in worldwide box office despite grossing only 70 million domestically. Nicole Kidman also does lots of niche movies (Dogville, Birth, Fur) that would never find wider audience. I would only certify Invasion and The Stepford Wives (an unnecessary remake) as flops. Basically, her movies do better internationally just like Adam Sandler’s movies are bigger domestic successes.

    PS. Even though in last decade foreign box has played a big part in movie business because of sheer number of markets, most people completely ignore it while reporting about box office. Nikkie Finke is quick to call actors box office poison but she never takes their foreign grosses into consideration.

  37. 37

    haqyunus says:
    Saturday, April 4, 2009 at 10:57pm

    well my objection on the casting is not due to nicole kidman (who is not bad) but bcz cynthia nixon was ignored. no matter who was cast instead of kidman here i would have complained. The Rabbit Hole was a great vehicle for nixon and she deserved the chance.

  38. 38

    dela says:
    Saturday, April 4, 2009 at 11:17pm

    haqyunus, I like Cynthia Nixon (my favorite SATC actor) and would have loved to see her do this. Unfortunately, this is almost always the case with Broadway plays. People usually underestimate Nixon and she’s really coming into her own as an actor and she’ll land a great movie part in a matter of time. In last few years she has won Emmys, Tony, Grammy and can an Oscar be next? I wouldn’t be surprised if she is singled out for a great supporting turn.
    However, I am happy to see Nicole Kidman getting a great role. I think she would be great in the role. She’ll be rewarded if she nails it, esp. if people think she is playing against type.

    JCM is an inspired choice for director. But, I desperately want Mike Nichols to direct one of these prize winning plays for big screen. Maybe, he’ll do Osage County.

  39. 39

    VCB says:
    Sunday, April 5, 2009 at 12:29am

    ordinary cow– no, i mean “reservation road” with joaquin phoenix and jennifer connelly..

  40. 40

    Afrika says:
    Sunday, April 5, 2009 at 2:57am

    dela

    cynthina nixon has a GRAMMY?

  41. 41

    dela says:
    Sunday, April 5, 2009 at 3:20am

    Yes, she shared it with Blair Underwood and Beau Bridges for An Inconvenient Truth (Best Spoken Word Album).

    I think Bill Clinton also has one.

  42. 42

    humdinger says:
    Sunday, April 5, 2009 at 11:31am

    how about sam mendes or jonathan demme to helm this one??

  43. 43

    haqyunus says:
    Sunday, April 5, 2009 at 11:56am

    Todd Field would also be a good choice. Love ‘In the Bedroom’ and ‘Little Children’

  44. 44

    elias says:
    Sunday, April 5, 2009 at 1:34pm

    43 and 44

    John Cameron Mitchell is the director, can’t you read ?

    Also, i have to laugh at the idea that the last Kidman films were not hits. Although they did poorly in the US, they did great oversea (The Golden Compass grossed 372 million dollars altogether and Australia 207, how can they be considered flops ?)

  45. 45

    Afrika says:
    Sunday, April 5, 2009 at 2:58pm

    elias

    You tell them. TELL THEM.

  46. 46

    Drew says:
    Tuesday, April 7, 2009 at 9:04pm

    Nicole is a big International draw. Those International numbers saved the studios of that particular film of hers some red ink. This sounds like a great project for her and hope it happens. I have been hoping Nicole gets back in with Oscar and award contention soon. I am not sure if “Nine” will do the trick for her as I was all but sure ” Australia” would. Poor Nicole didn’t get one nomination for her role as Lady Ashley out of the fifty or more award guilds out there.

  47. 47

    Ed says:
    Monday, April 13, 2009 at 12:39pm

    This makes me want to buy every copy of Days of Thunder and run them over repeatedly.

One Trackback

  1. [...] a morte do filho (crianças morrendo parece ser um recurso narrativo de prestígio hoje em dia), num filme dirigido por… John Cameron Mitchell! Adoro [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published or shared. Required fields are marked *