I have no beef against Nikki Finke, like many do. In fact, I’ve always admired her throughout the years for her tenacity and fortitude forging a path in a mostly male dominated industry. But something went a little funny when I started seeing more and more news breaks coming from the Motion Picture Academy to Deadline exclusively.  The Academy then releases a pointless, redundant news item which no one bothers to post because, well, it’s already been broken by Deadline.  Well, all that is fine and well if Deadline weren’t in the Oscar business. But they are squarely in the Oscar business, with Pete Hammond who makes a lot of money doing Q&A’s for the Academy during Oscar season while also writing Deadline’s Oscar column.  Deadline takes For Your Consideration ads.  So far, so good – this is pretty much what Variety and Hollywood Reporter did back in the day – except for one key difference and that difference, I believe, lies with what I just saw on Deadline just now — apparently David Poland has been writing about it for a while now but I, with my head in the sand, did not see it. In the end, by giving exclusive news breaks to Deadline, and employing Pete Hammond from Deadline, the Academy is, to my mind, endorsing Deadline. And from what I know about them that is not usually how they do business. So it was worth noting.


The thing is, again, fine — the LA Times and The Wrap and other outlets do similar stuff but come on, “personal perspectives in the Oscar race” with Nikki Finke calling Scott Rudin a “baby” or whatever it was?  I’m sorry but that’s about as objective as having me moderate it.  And finally, all of this would mean nothing were it not for Deadline’s connection to the Academy. Surely this must violate their rules and yet no one seems to be noticing – no New York Times, no Los Angeles Times. Only David Poland.

The Academy once asked me if they could use my site to deliver news to their App. And I said “Sure but do you know my site?” I knew that one look and they would flat out say no because my site takes sides. So does Deadline Hollywood.  The Academy should be aware of this.

It’s one thing to be a biased advocating site — to campaign for films because you believe they are good.  It’s one thing to reach Academy members with what you write — there is no way of really controlling that. But when the Academy aligns themselves so throughly with a news outlet like that and they dip themselves into the Oscar race as this event clearly is doing – I don’t know.  Seems rather slippery, Agent Starling.

Load More Related Articles
Load More By Sasha Stone
Load More In AMPAS Antics
  • The Pope

    Shameless. Worrying. Take your pick. Better still, don’t. It is both shameless and worrying. What next? Nikki becomes an Academy member and uses her site to slay anyone who dares not please her?

  • Patryk

    Time for a new Academy President.

  • Jenny Lee

    I saw The Contenders post and was wondering about that….

  • R

    Its like our political system on a much tinier scale, bought yet not bought at the same time. Kind of bought. But the slippery slope in my opinion is mich worse than being overtly in the studios pocket (like harry knowles). Sounds like she wants it both ways, to be a film journalist with integrity and to have the perks

  • Nikki Fenke would have been better off becoming a business writer. She clearly doesn’t actually enjoy films. That reflects most in her writing.

  • AD

    Well, and funny enough now the comments are off! Can’t handle the criticisms!

  • brandz

    I’m glad you admit your site takes sides.

  • Sasha Stone

    I’m glad you admit your site takes sides.

    It’s impossible not to. Boring too. The only people who object are those whose side you aren’t on.

  • Why can’t you take sides though? For example, newspapers usually endorse a candidate for mayor or president. What’s the difference between a paper and a website? I mean we get the gist of what your favorite movies are this year, but you still display ads for all the movies. Doesn’t that make it fair?

  • Macy

    If ‘Harry Potter’ gets nominated for Best Picture, we know exactly who gets the credit for that. Btw, I also heard that female voters might be put off by Woody Harrelson’s character in ‘Rampart’. Seems like Nikki Fenke does not mind it at all.

  • John Oliver

    I happen to like Nikki’s inside scoops, but no one should influence the Oscar race but the voters themselves. Journalism should and must remain objective, if not then we’ve all been had.

  • brainypirate

    Poland’s been knocking Finke for being a bad journalist for a long time–not just for being in bed with AMPAS, but for having bad facts and bad interpretations of facts.

    I have no idea if he’s right–I’d be curious to hear if others agree with him–but it ain’t just this Oscar Luncheon thing that has him riled up.

  • Natasha

    Wait….The Artist is WEINSTEIN’S, well, that explains an f-ing lot.

  • Harry

    good to know. Thanks Sasha

Check Also

Predictions Friday – Manchester and Moonlight Get a Boost

It isn’t that people weren’t predicting Kenneth Lonergan’s Manchester by…