Quantcast

The Princess and the Frog, Trailer 2

Posted by Ryan Adams On September - 8 - 2009

From the looks of this new trailer, The Princess and the Frog plans to offer everything I expect from first-class animation: a fully realized alternate universe, an effortless sense humor, distinctive voice work, lush visual opulence, a fresh approach to a classic theme, and a sense of imaginative magic — all the things Pixar provided in abundance with Finding Nemo, Ratatouille, and WALL-E. But failed, for me, to achieve with Up. [ducks] I wonder how many insider chuckles were had by the hand-drawn animators in creating the scene where the balloons pop.

Casino Online



30 Responses for "The Princess and the Frog, Trailer 2"

  1. Tufas September 8th, 2009 at 8:38 pm 1

    Can’t wait!

  2. Academy Awards Guru September 8th, 2009 at 8:39 pm 2

    A new classic!

  3. Magically Delicious September 8th, 2009 at 8:51 pm 3

    People here in Louisiana were rather put off by Benjamin Button being set in New Orleans. I think they’re getting a bit tired of NOLA being the latest Hollywood scene. I’m nervous about how this is going to play down here, especially with so many Cajun and Creole caricatures at work.

  4. Student of World September 8th, 2009 at 8:56 pm 4

    I LOVE IT!

  5. Ryan Adams September 8th, 2009 at 9:02 pm 5

    “…failed, for me, to achieve with Up.”

    To be fair, probably should’ve have said “failed to fully achieve.” (I’d already used the word “fully” a couple of lines earlier.)

    But really, bottom line, failure to fully achieve something is a little like failure to fully impregnate somebody, isn’t it?

  6. The Natural September 8th, 2009 at 9:37 pm 6

    ***distinctive voice work, lush visual opulence, a fresh approach to a classic theme, and a sense of imaginative magic***

    And this isn’t in abundance in “Up?” Think a little harder, Ryan.

  7. filmboymichael September 8th, 2009 at 9:52 pm 7

    in unrelated news – i just read that army archerd has died….

  8. Afrika September 8th, 2009 at 10:53 pm 8

    so she’s a frog for a hefty chunk of the movie? damn! disney, I see you discriminate equally. Even the animated black women don’t get any decent screen time from you.

  9. Daniel September 8th, 2009 at 11:43 pm 9

    Even if Up didn’t have all of those things (which it did), it had more than enough emotional depth (achieved more of that in just the first 20 minutes than most movies do in 100) and interesting character development to make up for it.

  10. Ryan Adams September 8th, 2009 at 11:57 pm 10

    “…achieved more of that in just the first 20 minutes than most movies do in 100″

    Agreed, Daniel. Now if only the whole movie had been up to the standards of those first 20, and two more minutes at the very end, then maybe I’d be a bigger fan.

    “interesting character development”? Lou Grant learns how to hug? Gee, never saw that coming.

  11. Jesus September 9th, 2009 at 1:22 am 11

    “interesting character development”? Lou Grant learns how to hug? Gee, never saw that coming.”

    You missed the point entirely. It’s not that Carl learns how to hug. He was shown to be quite capable of that early on. It’s that he learns how to let go and continue living.

  12. Ryan Adams September 9th, 2009 at 1:44 am 12

    Unfair simplification on my part, Jesus, but honestly I wish I found the “development” you describe any more interesting or surprising: “he learns how to let go and continue living.”

    Either Carl already decided to keep on living and pursuing adventure in the first 10 minutes, when he launched the house, or else that realization suddenly dawned on him in the final moments when he finally got around to turning the page in the album and had a Eureka! moment. Either way, not a very steep arc, for me. He could have as easily “developed” the ability to turn a page in a book without ever setting sail for South America. The adventure was filler, for me, and didn’t advance anyone’s personal growth, at all. Also, I like to see more than one character develop in a movie. Ratatouille gave us 5 or 6 intersecting arcs.

  13. SeattleMoviegoer September 9th, 2009 at 2:42 am 13

    i might also have to duck on this comment…
    i love the Pixar films passionately.
    Lassiter and his co-horts are geniuses.
    but their films lack one thing that the classic animated,
    hand-drawn Disney films possess in abundance…glorious music.
    granted, Michael Giacchino’s scores have been very good,
    especially for INCREDIBLES, but can you recall the music
    off the top of your head? i was expecting something
    wonderful to accompany Carl and his flying house–
    something akin to Victor Young’s score that accompanied
    David Niven and Cantinflas’ flight in a balloon.
    but no. it was serviceable at best.
    Pixar needs to join up with Alan Menken.

  14. Jake D September 9th, 2009 at 5:02 am 14

    Might be just me, but this looks like a rehashing of old Disney tropes. The wishing on a star = Pinocchio. The animals wanting to be human again = Beauty and the Beast (with the dinnerware – there was a song cut called “Human Again”).

    Oh, and it looks like the magic Negro (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magical_negro) will be well represented as well.

  15. The RRA Ultimatum September 9th, 2009 at 5:50 am 15

    “I’m nervous about how this is going to play down here, especially with so many Cajun and Creole caricatures at work.”

    Oh come on, look at POCAHONTAS and…shit, you’re right.

    Jake D – Ah yes, Disney and Magic Negro go way back to FANTASIA and SONG OF THE SOUTH. Weird how Disney refuses to release SONG on DVD in America, but does so in Europe and Latin America, and Japan. Talk about double insulting standards.

    And I know all that because I owned SONG on tape as a kid. Courtesy of the local Miami flea market/bootleg tables back in the day. I shit you not. I feel dirty just admitting this fact.

  16. Jonathan September 9th, 2009 at 7:54 am 16

    I liked Up, but I really don’t want it to get nominated simply because of that attitude the Academy seems to have towards animation. Pixar being Pixar, there’s a big chance they’ll make another film as brilliant as Wall-E or Ratatouille in a few years and then, it’s likely the Academy will just ignore it again, thinking how the nomination for Up should shut the complaining bloggers for another few years.

  17. lucky38 September 9th, 2009 at 9:06 am 17

    I actually like that Pixar doesn’t turn every film into a Broadway musical. I agree that there are memorable songs, but many times the big show-stopping numbers take me out of the flow of the story.

  18. Jake G. September 9th, 2009 at 9:54 am 18

    Jake D says :: “it looks like the magic Negro will be well represented as well.”

    Jake G. Says :: Some of my best friends are magic Negros.

  19. chrisw September 9th, 2009 at 11:41 am 19

    Jake D – Ah yes, Disney and Magic Negro go way back to FANTASIA and SONG OF THE SOUTH. Weird how Disney refuses to release SONG on DVD in America, but does so in Europe and Latin America, and Japan. Talk about double insulting standards.

    The NAACP has threatened Disney with lawsuits, and/or boycotts if it is released here, which is a shame because it is a fantastic movie. What’s insulting is the Academy only gave Remus a special Oscar instead of just nominating or giving him the win.

    I’m just not feeling this movie, I don’t think Disney itself is capable of pulling off anything brilliant anymore. It’s been a long time since The Lion King, even though Mulan was pretty good as well. I just see it as a dud, what they need is some of the Pixar guys to come in and show them what to do. Traditional animation must come back, I want a film as good as Cinderella again dammit.

    Disney should look into adapting Rabbit Hill, great story.

  20. Jake D September 9th, 2009 at 12:34 pm 20

    Jake G: Not saying that the magic Negro doesn’t exist, but it’s a lazy stock character. I think that’s the main difference between Disney and Pixar’s animated pics: Disney deals in adaptations, makes everything a musical, and is light on originality. Pixar uses original screenplays, ideas, and characters, and their success is probably dependent on it at this point (I would say Up was a mild misfire on this front, though).

  21. errol September 9th, 2009 at 4:09 pm 21

    Did the young guy and plump older companion just walk in from the animated ‘Anastasia’? I swear they are identical to Dimitri and whats-his-name …. features, clothing, mannerisms. Its putting me off the movie when everything else is clicking.

  22. bambi September 9th, 2009 at 5:07 pm 22

    #8 “Even the animated black women don’t get any decent screen time from you.”

    Only because she`s not fat. The fat one with the gator ain`t turnin` in no frog.

  23. Afrika September 9th, 2009 at 5:18 pm 23

    All this trailer resonated for me was a thundering meh.

  24. André September 9th, 2009 at 5:42 pm 24

    Ryan, I think the whole “taking off with the house” thing was more about fulfilling his life’s wish than actually embarking on an adventure… in fact, I thought it was pretty morbid, really, like he was just gonna go there and die (how the hell was he supposed to live over there, after all??).

    IMO it’s only much later in the film (quite close to the end) that he actually lets go and starts living for himself.

    I know I always say this this time of the year, but once again, the Pixar film is my fave of the year so far!

    (I’m only commenting on Up now ‘cuz it opened here in Brazil last friday and I avoided all talk over it to remain spoiler-free, btw)

  25. Ryan Adams September 9th, 2009 at 5:46 pm 25

    Up is much beloved so I’m willing to accept the sad fact that I’m missing the boat, André.

    Although it’s not a favorite of mind I’ve never said I don’t think there’s an excellent chance Up could land in the Big 10.

  26. Daren September 9th, 2009 at 10:52 pm 26

    I hate to say it, but I kind of agree with Afrika, it was kind of meh. There was nothing here that has not been fully done by Disney before and I thought the whole trailer felt like a wannabe from the 90s renaissance for Disney. I still want and look forward to seeing it because I adore hand drawn animation but this trailer was rather bland.

  27. Afrika September 9th, 2009 at 11:28 pm 27

    I can see that this trailer has given some of you an excuse to start making magic negro jokes. You know yourself; you’ve been warned.

  28. Nick K. September 10th, 2009 at 10:42 pm 28

    Geez Afrika, you sure do find something to complain about don’t you? When it’s her prince not being Black (though he’s not white either) to the main character being a frog for most of the movie, you sure do find something to quibble about. If I recall correctly, you sounded pretty excited for this movie. What happened?

    For me, it looks alright, though the animation looks vibrant and splendid.

    Oh, and I saw 9 earlier this afternoon. Oscar chances don’t look so good. :(

  29. Afrika September 11th, 2009 at 1:08 pm 29

    Nick K
    what happened? I discovered that disney was using “first black princess” as a marketing strategy. The “black” princess is a frog for a huge chunk of the movie; talk about revolutionary right? and after watching the trailer multiple times, I don’t see any originality at all. My desperate hope for the return of old Disney classics and my excitement over disney’s first “black” princess ( frog princess is more I like it) skewed my ability to be accurately subjective (just what Disney wanted). I’ve come to my senses and this movie is going to be a HOT BOILING MESS. With 9 getting lackluster reviews (UNFORTUNATELY!!!! AHHH THAT WAS MY PICK FOR FAVORITE MOVIE OF THE YEAR) I guess the underwhelming UP is going to be the animated champion at the Oscars.

  30. Disney princess book September 26th, 2009 at 5:20 am 30

    Disney princess book…

    The Princess and the Frog, Trailer 2 is an excellent post about the Disney princess book….


Leave a reply


All comments should respect the Awards Daily House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please let us know, quoting the comment in question.



  • 82nd Oscar Ceremony

    Hosts: Steve Martin and Alec Baldwin
    Producers: Adam Shankman, Bill Mechanic
    Director: Hamish Hamilton
    Music: Marc Shaiman

    Quentin Tarantino
    Pedro Almodovar

    Ampas Breakdown

    Actors-1,205
    Producers-462
    Executives-436
    Sound-405
    Writers-382
    Art Directors-373
    Directors-375
    Public Relations-370
    Members at Large-254
    Shorts/Feature Ani-335
    Visual Effects-272
    Music-233
    Editors-227
    Cinematographers-201
    Original Score-234
    Documentary-145
    Makeup-115
    Total Voting Members -approx 5,777


  • 82nd Oscar Ceremony

    Hosts: Steve Martin and Alec Baldwin
    Producers: Adam Shankman, Bill Mechanic
    Director: Hamish Hamilton
    Music: Marc Shaiman

    Quentin Tarantino
    Pedro Almodovar

  • Tuesday, December 1, 2009: Official Screen Credits forms due

    Monday, December 28, 2009: Nominations ballots mailed

    Saturday, January 23, 2010: Nominations polls close 5 p.m. PT

    Tuesday, February 2, 2010: Nominations announced 5:30 a.m. PT, Samuel Goldwyn Theater

    Wednesday, February 10, 2010: Final ballots mailed

    Monday, February 15, 2010: Nominees Luncheon

    Saturday, February 20, 2010: Scientific and Technical Achievement Awards presentation

    Tuesday, March 2, 2010: Final polls close 5 p.m. PT

    Sunday, March 7, 2010: 82nd Annual Academy Awards presentation



  • Twitter
    Facebook
    RSS





  • Words

    “I caught The Hurt Locker again last night. What a great film. Kathryn Bigelow is probably the most deserving of the nominees. I think if Cameron does pull off the upset, I don’t think sexism will be the problem. I think box office receipts and a concern with AMPAS trying to be “relevant” with the general public will be the actual result. Which brings me to this issue:

    I do not understand why some critics out there think that the Academy should pick films that are more mainstream? I heard a commentator the other day saying that the 2008 (No Country for Old Men) ceremony was one of the most boring telecasts in the Academy’s history. Yes, it had their lowest ratings ever. But even if this makes me come off as snobbish, that explanation is a bunch of horseshit. 2007 was a great year in movies, and if LCD (lowest common denominator) critics and audiences don’t like it, tough.

    Since I consider myself a film buff, it doesn’t bother me when the Academy pick films that general audiences may have a problem with. Let us be honest, your average film goer usually does not have the greatest taste in the world. And “difficult” films are usually more profound and original.

    On a side note, I finally got around to seeing Julie & Julia this morning. Meryl Streep SHOULD NOT win the Oscar this year. That performance was ok, but not her greatest. Her performance in Doubt was a lot better. Mulligan and Sidibe should be the two actresses vying for the award, but that certainly is not the case. Honestly, I think I will be disappointed if Streep or Bullock win this year. Neither performance was that spectacular, in relation to the competition.”
    by Sam
  • Recent Comments

  • Contender Tracker

    Awards So Far

    NBR Winner+
    /top ten*
    LAFCA Winner+
    BFCA Critics Choice Win+/Nominee*
    NYFCC Winner +/*
    SEFCA Winners+/*
    Golden Globes Nominee+/*
    SAG Winner+/Nominee*
    National Society of Film Critics winners+
    Producers Guild Winner+/Nominees*
    Directors Guild Winners+/Nominees*
    Art Directors Guild Nominees*
    Writers Guild Nominees*
    American Cinematographers Society*
    American Cinema Editors*
    Cinema Audio Society*
    BAFTA Nominations*


    Best Picture
    The Hurt Locker*+++**+++******
    Avatar*+********
    Inglourious Basterds***+****
    Up in the Air+*+*******
    Precious******
    District 9*****
    A Serious Man*****
    An Education*****
    Up****
    The Blind Side

    Best Actor
    Jeff Bridges, Crazy Heart++++*
    George Clooney, Up in the Air+*++***
    Jeremy Renner, The Hurt Locker**+*
    Colin Firth, A Single Man****
    Morgan Freeman, Invictus+***

    Best Actress
    Sandra Bullock, The Blind Side+++
    Meryl Streep, Julie & Julia++++**
    Carey Mulligan, An Education+****
    Gabby Sidibe, Precious****
    Helen Mirren, The Last Station**

    Best Supporting Actor
    Christoph Waltz, Inglourious Basterds+++++++*
    Woody Harrelson,The Messenger+***
    Stanley Tucci, The Lovely Bones****
    Matt Damon, Invictus***
    Christopher Plummer, The Last Station*

    Best Supporting Actress
    Mo'Nique, Precious+*+++++*
    Anna Kendrick, Up in the Air+****
    Vera Farmiga, Up in the Air****
    Penelope Cruz, Nine**
    Maggie Gyllenhaal, Crazy Heart

    Best Director
    Kathryn Bigelow, The Hurt Locker++++*++*
    Jim Cameron, Avatar*+**
    Quentin Tarantino, Inglourious Basterds****
    Jason Reitman, Up in the Air***
    Lee Daniels, Precious**

    Best Original Screenplay
    Quentin Tarantino, Inglourious Basterds+*
    Joel and Ethan Coen, A Serious Man+*+*
    Mark Boal, The Hurt Locker***
    Bob Peterson, Pete Docter, Up*
    Oren Moverman, Alessandro Camo The Messenger

    Best Adapted Screenplay
    Jason Reitman, Sheldon Turner, Up in the Air+++++*
    Armando Iannucci, In the Loop+
    Geoffrey Fletcher, Precious**
    Neill Blomkamp, Terri Tatchell, District 9**
    Nick Hornby, An Education*

    Best Editing

    Stephen Rivkin, John Refoua, James Cameron, Avatar+**
    Chris Innis, Bob Murawski, The Hurt Locker***
    Julian Clarke, District 9**
    Joe Klotz, Precious
    Sally Menke, Inglourious Basterds**

    Best Cinematography
    Mauro Fiore, Avatar+**
    Christian Berger, White Ribbon+++*
    Barry Ackroyd, The Hurt Locker***
    Robert Richardson, Inglourious Basterds***
    Bruno Delbonnel, Harry Potter

    Best Art Direction

    Avatar+**
    Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus*
    Nine*
    Sherlock Holmes
    The Young Victoria

    Best Sound Mixing

    Avatar+**
    The Hurt Locker***
    Star Trek* **
    Inglourious Basterds
    Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen*

    Best Sound Editing

    Avatar
    The Hurt Locker
    Up
    Star Trek
    Inglourious Basterds

    Best Costume Design
    Sandy Powell, The Young Victoria +*
    Catherine Leterrier,Coco Avant Chanel*
    Janet Patterson, Bright Star**
    Colleen Atwood, Nine*
    Monique Prudhomme, The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus

    Best Original Score
    Michael Giacchino, Up+*
    Marco Beltrami and Buck Sanders, The Hurt Locker!
    James Horner, Avatar*
    Alexandre Desplat, The Fantastic Mr. Fox
    Hans Zimmer, Sherlock Holmes*

    Best Foreign Language Film (submissions)

    A Prophet, France+*
    The White Ribbon, Germany**
    El Secreto de Sus Ojos, Argentina
    Ajami, Israel
    The Milk of Sorrow, Pru


    Best Documentary Feature

    The Cove++**+
    Food, Inc.**
    The Beaches of Agnes++*
    Burma VJ*
    The Most Dangerous Man in America
    Which Way Home


    Best Animated Feature
    Up+++**
    The Fantastic Mr. Fox+*+***
    Coraline****
    The Princess and the Frog***
    The Secret of Kells

    Best Visual Effects

    Avatar+*
    District 9* *
    Star Trek**

    Best Makeup

    The Young Victoria**
    Star Trek*

    Il Divo*


    Best Song
    The Weary Kind – T Bone Burnett, Ryan Bingham, Crazy Heart ++
    Down in New Orleans, The Princess and the Frog
    Almost There – Randy Newman, The Princess And The Frog***
    Loin de Paname, Paris 36

    Best Live Action Short
    The Door
    Instead of Abracadabra
    Kavi
    Miracle Fish
    The New Tenants


    Best Animated Short
    French Roast
    Granny O’Grimm’s Sleeping Beauty
    The Lady and the Reaper (La Dama y la Muerte)
    Logorama
    A Matter of Loaf and Death


    Best Documentary Short

    China’s Unnatural Disaster: The Tears of Sichuan Province
    The Last Campaign of Governor Booth Gardner
    The Last Truck: Closing of a GM Plant
    Music by Prudence
    Rabbit a la Berlin