Quantcast

Sneak Peek at Avatar Tonight During Glee

Posted by Sasha Stone On November - 11 - 2009

avatar-character-5

I saw the promos for this last night but can’t find any info online about it.  Footage will be shown at some point during tonight’s new episode of Fox’s runaway hit, Glee.  I suspect it will eventually find its way to YouTube so keep a look out for it.  One of the best things about Avatar now are the low expectations involved.  Heading into the Oscar race, that is, for the most part, where you want to be.  This seems to only apply to big Hollywood movies – the little indies really need the pre-season buzz to stay aloft.  The only problem has been the rumblings about the budget and the cost.  Point made here, and then debated here. Box office is the last thing on my mind with Avatar – the movie is going to kill.  Even if it tanks domestically, it will have a long life overseas.  From what I can tell, the film, like Titanic before it, has something for everyone.  Parents will take their kids, tweens and grandparents to it.  It looks like old school sci-fi mixed with new fangled digital 3-D.

  • Filed under: BEST PICTURE
  • |
  • Tags:

  • Casino Online



    23 Responses for "Sneak Peek at Avatar Tonight During Glee"

    1. Danny November 11th, 2009 at 11:17 am 1

      Yet ANOTHER reason to watch Glee! I love it!

    2. qwiggles November 11th, 2009 at 11:30 am 2

      It also looks pretty bad so far.

    3. Loyal November 11th, 2009 at 11:35 am 3

      The 3D footage shown at Avatar Day was stunning and the 3 minute long trailer worked really well.

      I’m looking forward to seeing it next month.

      Haters to the left!

    4. Free November 11th, 2009 at 11:39 am 4

      However this turns out, the effects are fantastic-looking.

      I don’t know how anyone can look at the latest trailer and not be at least a little excited, but I was one of the early skeptics, and this is one of my most anticipated.

    5. Gregoire November 11th, 2009 at 11:39 am 5

      I have few doubts that it will deliver, but I don’t understand the confidence based on the trailers we’ve seen thus far.

      The first trailer was flatout awful, the second one much improved but still lacking an IT factor.

      If you didn’t know the names attached to this film, few would be as inspired to sing its praises before even seeing it.

      To some, Waterworld looked this good in previews.

    6. Loyal November 11th, 2009 at 11:41 am 6

      Gregoire, you weren’t impressed by the IMAX 3D footage?

    7. Mike November 11th, 2009 at 11:42 am 7

      Somehow I don’t see this having the cross over appeal that, say TITANIC did. Parents will take their kids, yes, but their grandparents? I think thats a stretch.

      I still think it is going to turn off a lot of people who are going to assume from the trailers this is just a video game turned movie. It just has that look about it.

    8. babalabalu November 11th, 2009 at 11:45 am 8

      Why cant this smurf thing just go away? Arg.

    9. TAC November 11th, 2009 at 11:49 am 9

      I feel like I am the only person on here that doesn’t care about this movie. Nothing about it excites me.

    10. qwiggles November 11th, 2009 at 11:59 am 10

      Nothing about that trailer impresses me, Free. I honestly don’t see anything in this footage that is any different from what I’ve seen in the jungle chases in King Kong and the jungle warfare in Episode I. Neither of which were very strong. I am no more excited by a Naavi princess jumping while someone goes “Whooooo!” or by a pterodactyl thing taking on a guy in a big robot thing than I was excited by Jack Black running between T-Rexes.

      I’ve been eagerly following this thing for years. The moment my hopes began to wane was when I read the first script report, which described something a lot like a little boy’s dream version of Dances With Wolves in space, with a white dude going native with cool guns and beasties and KABOOMS. Then came the teaser, which looked more cartoony than I was expecting. Then came the full trailer, 98% of which consisted of lines like “Let’s dance,” “OutSTANDING,” “Marine, in an avatar body: that’s a potent mix!”, “you get me what I need, I’ll see to itchu get yer legs back — yerr REAL legs,” “do you forget what team you’re playin’ for?”, “I guess we bettah start then,” “we will send them a message — that this, THIS is our land!” (said by the slumming white tourist, gone blue/native.)

      I’m sure there’s a way to revolutionize 3D filmmaking without making a dogpile of insulting colonial white guilt cliches, but I have seen nothing to convince me that Cameron has done it. Prove me wrong, Avatar.

    11. bambi November 11th, 2009 at 12:44 pm 11

      Avatar needs to be bigger than New Moon or it`s in big trouble. cause new Moon will be huge and it costed little. Avatar, OTOH…The budget number that`s been tossed around is mind-blowing. I mean, I know that Titanic was the most expensive of all time at the time, but it`s easier to surpass $200 mio budget than freakin` $500 mio!? If the budget rumour is true than this thing is already a domestic dud unless lightning strikes twice for Cameron (which would be unprescended and awesome). We`ll see. Either way, it`s a guaranteed talk of the town for better or worse.

    12. Oshu Huddleston November 11th, 2009 at 12:53 pm 12

      It’s hard to get excited about amazing 3D if the amazing 3D’s subject matter is not even remotely interesting.

    13. Ryan Adams November 11th, 2009 at 1:13 pm 13

      Avatar targeted the Nickelodeon crowd with that last kid-friendly trailer. New Moon aims for something completely different with this PETA ad featuring Christian Serratos. (NSFW)

      c’mon Cameron. When are we going to see some nude furless Na’vi ass?

    14. bambi November 11th, 2009 at 1:28 pm 14

      Re: PETA ad – Bless New Moon!

      Avatar is supposed to be eco-friendly movie but it`s new Moon who`s actually standing up to animal cruelty, while Avatar is trying to make a buck off kids. terrible marketing.

    15. DBibby November 11th, 2009 at 1:29 pm 15

      TAC: You’re one of many, myself included.

    16. JAB November 11th, 2009 at 2:32 pm 16

      Yeah it totally looks like it has something for everyone…except everyone.

    17. Kelly November 11th, 2009 at 2:48 pm 17

      Ummmm. I love GLEE. I am suck a GLEEK. I don’t even know why. It’s because (A) Ich bin gay (B)I am a musician who likes to make fun of all the horrible things this show does (because let’s face it – NO high school music program is anywhere like that… they may try to be, but it’s not that good) (C)hotness on the show (D) Sue is freaking hilarious and (E) it’s so over-the-top.

      LOL Ok, I’m done now.

    18. KGB November 11th, 2009 at 4:47 pm 18

      TAC and DBibby – I’m with ya. This isn’t Titanic folks!(not that I’m an “overboard” admirer of that film) In other words, its Cameron going back to his sci-fi roots, and playing with new toys, where the best he could score (Sigourney aside) are technical nods. Still, the fun is in the anticipation. We shall see… nude furless Na’vi ass and more.

    19. Jon November 11th, 2009 at 10:35 pm 19

      Needs to be bigger than New Moon? Are you kidding me? Well, let’s compare James Cameron to whoever wrote the movie (and the books for that matter): To JC’s credit he created a superior sequel film to an amazing horror movie in Aiens, he gave us one of the most compelling and intricate movies and storylines with Terminator (not to mention character!), he brought the laughs and action with him in True Lies, and he delivered the biggest movie of all time that has only recently been rivaled by the likes of The Dark Knight. What did Twilight do? It had horrible acting and dialogue, lousy special effects and action. What’s New Moon going to have? Pretty much the same thing as the first, because it’s base is what’s wrong. No matter what anyone says, Stephanie Meyer CANNOT write a good story. James Cameron almost always has.

      Point being, whether or not this movie makes enough money to be successful, this could very well be James Cameron’s greatest accomplishment as a filmmaker, whereas Twilight and all of those movies will be standard throw away crap within a few years.

    20. bambi November 11th, 2009 at 11:22 pm 20

      Twilight Saga sans Breaking Dawn is so awesome and Edward and Bella are Jack and Rose of 21st century. And yes, Avatar needs to be bigger than New Moon otherwise it`s title won`t appear in the trailer for Cameron`s next movie like Abyss, his only flop, didn`t appear in Avatar trailer. And yes, for Cameron to be allowed to overspend on another genre spectacle such as Battle Angel Alita, Avatar needs to make money like New Moon, HP:HBP and Transformers together.

      Is this thing YouTube`d yet?

    21. Lop November 11th, 2009 at 11:29 pm 21

      i am seeing it as i am writing this..wow

    22. bambi November 11th, 2009 at 11:46 pm 22

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pce9mfbwvv0

      Very epic.Easily erases the Nickleodeon atrocity from memory. Starts like the second trailer but adds new scenes from the middle to the end. Can`t wait!

    23. Free November 12th, 2009 at 8:20 am 23

      Based on this post, is the reason most people here aren’t at all interested in it because it won’t be Titanic?

      Well, maybe that’s why I am interested, because I don’t care if it comes close to resembling that film. I wouldn’t care who was attached or not, I think it looks interesting, and I wouldn’t compare it to Waterworld at all. I only wanted to see that because I was into anything Kevin Costner, not because I actually thought it looked good.

      Like I said, good or bad, I’m impressed with the visuals. And back to the connection with Titanic, the rumblings on that film weren’t good at all before it was released. And it did pretty well for itself in the end. . .


    Leave a reply


    All comments should respect the Awards Daily House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please let us know, quoting the comment in question.



    • 82nd Oscar Ceremony

      Hosts: Steve Martin and Alec Baldwin
      Producers: Adam Shankman, Bill Mechanic
      Director: Hamish Hamilton
      Music: Marc Shaiman

      Quentin Tarantino
      Pedro Almodovar

      Ampas Breakdown

      Actors-1,205
      Producers-462
      Executives-436
      Sound-405
      Writers-382
      Art Directors-373
      Directors-375
      Public Relations-370
      Members at Large-254
      Shorts/Feature Ani-335
      Visual Effects-272
      Music-233
      Editors-227
      Cinematographers-201
      Original Score-234
      Documentary-145
      Makeup-115
      Total Voting Members -approx 5,777


    • 82nd Oscar Ceremony

      Hosts: Steve Martin and Alec Baldwin
      Producers: Adam Shankman, Bill Mechanic
      Director: Hamish Hamilton
      Music: Marc Shaiman

      Quentin Tarantino
      Pedro Almodovar

    • Tuesday, December 1, 2009: Official Screen Credits forms due

      Monday, December 28, 2009: Nominations ballots mailed

      Saturday, January 23, 2010: Nominations polls close 5 p.m. PT

      Tuesday, February 2, 2010: Nominations announced 5:30 a.m. PT, Samuel Goldwyn Theater

      Wednesday, February 10, 2010: Final ballots mailed

      Monday, February 15, 2010: Nominees Luncheon

      Saturday, February 20, 2010: Scientific and Technical Achievement Awards presentation

      Tuesday, March 2, 2010: Final polls close 5 p.m. PT

      Sunday, March 7, 2010: 82nd Annual Academy Awards presentation



    • Twitter
      Facebook
      RSS





    • Words

      “While I’m obviously not ruling it out, I don’t think Avatar will win Best Picture, and the new preferential voting system is precisely why. Had they stuck with just having each member vote on their favorite of the nominees, it might have won, but something tells me that there are a lot of people within the Academy who are part of the backlash against the film, and will therefore place it at #10 on their ballots. You have to keep in mind that from now on, the movie with the most #1 votes is not necessarily the movie that wins. It’s easy to imagine Avatar will get a lot of #1 votes, but it’s equally easy to imagine it will get a lot of #10 votes as well, and that will really hurt it.

      So you kind of have to think more along the lines of which movie will have the least against it, rather than the most for it. The Hurt Locker will undoubtedly get a lot of #1 votes as it is the frontrunner, and while I’m sure there will be those who put it at or near the bottom of their ballots, it seems to me that it will have a lot less low-end placements than Avatar will, and so The Hurt Locker easily has the edge over Avatar in that respect.

      Inglourious Basterds also seems like the kind of movie that will split voters. It’ll get a lot of #1 and #2 votes, but probably also a lot of #9 and #10 votes. So I don’t think it’ll win (though again, I’m not ruling it out). Precious will probably get less 9’s and 10’s, but I frankly don’t think it will get enough 1’s and 2’s to pull off a win. I think it’ll get mostly mid-range votes. Same goes for Up in the Air, though I imagine even that will get more 1’s and 2’s than Precious will.

      So to sum it up, I think The Hurt Locker, while not an absolute, no-turning-back lock, is still the clear frontrunner in this race. If we’re talking about a potential upset though, why not really factor in the new preferential voting system and try to imagine how much that could end up benefiting a film like, say, Up? While it might not get too many #1 votes, I can easily see it getting a lot of 2-4 votes, and who know? If the frontrunners all develop strong enough backlashes, then it could be that this year’s Best Picture will go not to the movie that is the most liked, but rather the movie that is the least DISliked. Just saying.”
      by Jean-Paul
    • Recent Comments

    • Contender Tracker

      Awards So Far

      NBR Winner+
      /top ten*
      LAFCA Winner+
      BFCA Critics Choice Win+/Nominee*
      NYFCC Winner +/*
      SEFCA Winners+/*
      Golden Globes Nominee+/*
      SAG Winner+/Nominee*
      National Society of Film Critics winners+
      Producers Guild Winner+/Nominees*
      Directors Guild Winners+/Nominees*
      Art Directors Guild Nominees*
      Writers Guild Nominees*
      American Cinematographers Society*
      American Cinema Editors*
      Cinema Audio Society*
      BAFTA Nominations*


      Best Picture
      The Hurt Locker*+++**+++******
      Avatar*+********
      Inglourious Basterds***+****
      Up in the Air+*+*******
      Precious******
      District 9*****
      A Serious Man*****
      An Education*****
      Up****
      The Blind Side

      Best Actor
      Jeff Bridges, Crazy Heart++++*
      George Clooney, Up in the Air+*++***
      Jeremy Renner, The Hurt Locker**+*
      Colin Firth, A Single Man****
      Morgan Freeman, Invictus+***

      Best Actress
      Sandra Bullock, The Blind Side+++
      Meryl Streep, Julie & Julia++++**
      Carey Mulligan, An Education+****
      Gabby Sidibe, Precious****
      Helen Mirren, The Last Station**

      Best Supporting Actor
      Christoph Waltz, Inglourious Basterds+++++++*
      Woody Harrelson,The Messenger+***
      Stanley Tucci, The Lovely Bones****
      Matt Damon, Invictus***
      Christopher Plummer, The Last Station*

      Best Supporting Actress
      Mo'Nique, Precious+*+++++*
      Anna Kendrick, Up in the Air+****
      Vera Farmiga, Up in the Air****
      Penelope Cruz, Nine**
      Maggie Gyllenhaal, Crazy Heart

      Best Director
      Kathryn Bigelow, The Hurt Locker++++*++*
      Jim Cameron, Avatar*+**
      Quentin Tarantino, Inglourious Basterds****
      Jason Reitman, Up in the Air***
      Lee Daniels, Precious**

      Best Original Screenplay
      Quentin Tarantino, Inglourious Basterds+*
      Joel and Ethan Coen, A Serious Man+*+*
      Mark Boal, The Hurt Locker***
      Bob Peterson, Pete Docter, Up*
      Oren Moverman, Alessandro Camo The Messenger

      Best Adapted Screenplay
      Jason Reitman, Sheldon Turner, Up in the Air+++++*
      Armando Iannucci, In the Loop+
      Geoffrey Fletcher, Precious**
      Neill Blomkamp, Terri Tatchell, District 9**
      Nick Hornby, An Education*

      Best Editing

      Stephen Rivkin, John Refoua, James Cameron, Avatar+**
      Chris Innis, Bob Murawski, The Hurt Locker***
      Julian Clarke, District 9**
      Joe Klotz, Precious
      Sally Menke, Inglourious Basterds**

      Best Cinematography
      Mauro Fiore, Avatar+**
      Christian Berger, White Ribbon+++*
      Barry Ackroyd, The Hurt Locker***
      Robert Richardson, Inglourious Basterds***
      Bruno Delbonnel, Harry Potter

      Best Art Direction

      Avatar+**
      Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus*
      Nine*
      Sherlock Holmes
      The Young Victoria

      Best Sound Mixing

      Avatar+**
      The Hurt Locker***
      Star Trek* **
      Inglourious Basterds
      Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen*

      Best Sound Editing

      Avatar
      The Hurt Locker
      Up
      Star Trek
      Inglourious Basterds

      Best Costume Design
      Sandy Powell, The Young Victoria +*
      Catherine Leterrier,Coco Avant Chanel*
      Janet Patterson, Bright Star**
      Colleen Atwood, Nine*
      Monique Prudhomme, The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus

      Best Original Score
      Michael Giacchino, Up+*
      Marco Beltrami and Buck Sanders, The Hurt Locker!
      James Horner, Avatar*
      Alexandre Desplat, The Fantastic Mr. Fox
      Hans Zimmer, Sherlock Holmes*

      Best Foreign Language Film (submissions)

      A Prophet, France+*
      The White Ribbon, Germany**
      El Secreto de Sus Ojos, Argentina
      Ajami, Israel
      The Milk of Sorrow, Pru


      Best Documentary Feature

      The Cove++**+
      Food, Inc.**
      The Beaches of Agnes++*
      Burma VJ*
      The Most Dangerous Man in America
      Which Way Home


      Best Animated Feature
      Up+++**
      The Fantastic Mr. Fox+*+***
      Coraline****
      The Princess and the Frog***
      The Secret of Kells

      Best Visual Effects

      Avatar+*
      District 9* *
      Star Trek**

      Best Makeup

      The Young Victoria**
      Star Trek*

      Il Divo*


      Best Song
      The Weary Kind – T Bone Burnett, Ryan Bingham, Crazy Heart ++
      Down in New Orleans, The Princess and the Frog
      Almost There – Randy Newman, The Princess And The Frog***
      Loin de Paname, Paris 36

      Best Live Action Short
      The Door
      Instead of Abracadabra
      Kavi
      Miracle Fish
      The New Tenants


      Best Animated Short
      French Roast
      Granny O’Grimm’s Sleeping Beauty
      The Lady and the Reaper (La Dama y la Muerte)
      Logorama
      A Matter of Loaf and Death


      Best Documentary Short

      China’s Unnatural Disaster: The Tears of Sichuan Province
      The Last Campaign of Governor Booth Gardner
      The Last Truck: Closing of a GM Plant
      Music by Prudence
      Rabbit a la Berlin