Quantcast

It’s Getting Hot in Here – Gurus Updates

Posted by Sasha Stone On November - 25 - 2009

The Gurus of Gold have laid it down after screening many of the Oscar contenders — most of them have seen Nine, Invictus, Up in the Air — most have not seen The Lovely Bones nor Avatar. Interestingly, Anne Thompson sped Invictus right to number one. It is impossible, I can tell you, to predict the Oscars in any way, shape or form before the films have been released. If a person manages to do it it’s just blind luck. The Oscar race, as I always say like a broken record, is not static; it is fluid. It changes as the mood of the audiences changes. My final theory on this is that people choose films for two reasons. The first is because they were moved by the story. The second is that it somehow identifies them to the world at large. What they choose is who they are. That means that films have to be sexy and hot in order to do well in the race.  If the Oscar race comes down to perception, perception now starts in how the voices online shape the image of the film long before it hits theaters.

So that, even if the film does well, it could still be carrying a stigma that will trickle down to voters eventually. This is probably one of the worst things about the race as it stands today; how are films to be judged on whether they are good or bad without the echo chamber and group think?

Here is how the Gurus shaped up for Thanksgiving week.

Screen shot 2009-11-25 at 8.34.14 PM

Your Best Picture, I can guarantee you, is on this list.  I think Avatar is way too far down on the list, however.  We’re still very much in the “nobody knows anything” phase.  Trust me on this.  I can’t state it more emphatically every year – this is a best guess.  We won’t really know how it is going to go until the majors ring in.  And every time they do this chart will shift.

Anyway, you can check out the full chart over at MCN.

  • Filed under: AWARDS CHATTER
  • |
  • Tags:

  • Casino Online



    43 Responses for "It’s Getting Hot in Here – Gurus Updates"

    1. Craig November 25th, 2009 at 11:06 pm 1

      I’m thinking more and more that this is going to be the 10. I wouldn’t be surprised if MAYBE one drops out, but I agree that the winner is there for sure. Not a bad list, actually.

    2. Ryan Adams November 25th, 2009 at 11:43 pm 2

      I think — and, honestly, I hope — that 2 of those movies will falter in the final round. Then we can get two more interesting choices to shake things up a little. If not, then I’ll be taking a lot of naps in February. There are only 6 titles here that excite me at all.* And two of them have been around since summer.

      *(The Hurt Locker, Nine, Avatar, Inglourious Basterds, Up in the Air, and… hmm, make that 5 titles.)

    3. Vermicious Knid November 25th, 2009 at 11:49 pm 3

      Would we even be talking about Avatar’s chances in a five nominee year?

    4. soso November 26th, 2009 at 12:00 am 4

      ‘Invictus’ Review: A Whole New Ballgame
      By David Ansen | NEWSWEEK

    5. Alfredo November 26th, 2009 at 12:05 am 5

      Still hoping the academy will show some love to Where The Wild Things Are. I really liked it. So far it’s in my top 10 of the year…and I didn’t like UP – sorry I know it’s sacrilege around here but it didn’t move me the same way WALL E did.

    6. Nick K. November 26th, 2009 at 12:30 am 6

      I agree with Alfredo about “Wiild Things.” If it gets some precursor love, it had a credible shot of sneaking in. If it is snubbed, I won’t be surprised, but I will be a little disappointed. Judging from this list, if this is the BP race in March, I am far from interested.

    7. A.J November 26th, 2009 at 12:35 am 7

      “Would we even be talking about Avatar’s chances in a five nominee year?”

      Absolutely. It was always poised to dominate the tech categories such as near best picture misses in the past like King Kong and The Matrix. Not to mention the return of James Cameron.

    8. MateoStarr November 26th, 2009 at 12:40 am 8

      This is a little off topic but definitely amusing. Before you look at Pete Hammond’s predictions on that chart. Check out rotten tomatoes and see that he is one of only four critics to give a fresh rating to Old Dogs.
      Saying it’s “An often riotously funny slapstick farce that ought to appeal to moviegoers of all ages.”

      http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/10009596-old_dogs/

      Not to mention he has The Hurt Locker ranked 7. Anyone who has that movie ranked out of the top five is a little bit lost this season.

    9. Mark November 26th, 2009 at 1:05 am 9

      This list looks lukewarm at best.

    10. soso November 26th, 2009 at 1:06 am 10

      Movie Review: ‘Invictus’: A Whole New Ballgame
      By David Ansen | NEWSWEEK

      http://www.newsweek.com/id/224352

    11. Dan November 26th, 2009 at 1:26 am 11

      A Serious Man is better than all these that I’ve seen but The Hurt Locker.

    12. j November 26th, 2009 at 2:13 am 12

      Out of the 12 I saw as front right after fest season, the 12 w/multiple votes are those 12 minus the 2 I want the most (A Single Man & Bright Star) plus Basterds and Meryl Streep…er, It’s Complicated.

      I hope A Single Man & Bright Star knock two of them out, say…Basterds & Education or Invictus.

    13. Stefan November 26th, 2009 at 2:21 am 13

      Not a bad list at all. But I agree with Ryan, it would be great to see 2 or more surprises, which shake the contest up a bit. My first 3 suggestions would be 500 Days of Summer, District 9 and Star Trek!

      Instead of? Would it be a sacrilege to say that An Education only lives through Carey Mulligan but is an average film apart from that? And as much as I would love to see Inglourious Basterds: is the Academy that progressive?

    14. Loyal November 26th, 2009 at 2:54 am 14

      Solid 10. I do think An Education (which I loved) is too high and Avatar is too low. And I’d unfortunately include A Serious Man over Inglorious Basterds. And poor Bright Star :(

      The next 15 days should sort it all out (ending with press screenings of Avatar). I wonder if Fox Searchlight’s Hail Mary pass with Crazy Heart will make a dent. Too bad 500 Days of Summer didnt make 30 Million more dollars at the box office.

    15. Dominik November 26th, 2009 at 3:28 am 15

      I think “A Single Man” is highly underestimated by most of the “experts”!
      And yes, I agree with Ryan: All in all this list is kind of boring! If these 10 films are the most presumably choices, I urgently ask the Academy to please turn back to 5 nominees!

      …or turn your attention to more intresting movies like “Broken Embraces”, “A Serious Man”, “A Single Man” or “A Prophet”!

    16. Tufas November 26th, 2009 at 3:49 am 16

      I can’t remember such a sad year for award-caliber movies.

      There’s only 3 on that list I’m mildly interested in, and even those pale in comparison to any nominee from previous years.

      Roll on 2010

      T.

    17. Squasher November 26th, 2009 at 6:23 am 17

      I don’t see why Up has so much buzz for Best Picture. KEEP IT IN THE ANIMATED CATEGORY!!!

    18. aspect ratio November 26th, 2009 at 7:37 am 18

      I can’t imagine The Lovely Bones getting in with the mixed reviews it’s getting, especially not over a widely well-reviewed and acclaimed film like A Serious Man.

      (I do realize most of the votes on this list were probably made before the reviews for The Lovely Bones started coming out though, I’m sure by next week things will reflect that)

    19. Sasha Stone November 26th, 2009 at 8:20 am 19

      Thanks for the review link Soso. I’m wondering if this removes us from the embargo on the film? I hope so because I’m dying to write about Invictus.

      Regarding 3-D – you know, if we are going to dismiss every technological advancement we might as well start all the way back with the advent of film itself. Or when it went color. When Ted Turner wanted to colorize old movies that went too far. But what Cameron is doing with 3-D, hell, what Zemeckis is doing with 3-D, is beyond that now – it IS art.

    20. bambi November 26th, 2009 at 8:26 am 20

      What really matters is Top 5 aka BP/BD combos and Top 5 from this list won`t look this way, most likely some change will occur on spots 4 and 5. or Daniels won`t get a BD nod like some predict (and having seen the movie myself, I`m sceptical of his chances).

      Also, where is Holmes? I want this movie to be awesome and get in because Hunter`s passion for it and tireless awareness-raising, really moved me. I want it to rock for Hunter. So Holmes in Top 5.

    21. Jeremie November 26th, 2009 at 8:32 am 21

      That’s a pretty good list. Just hope A serious man could be a little higher. And thanks God nobody even considered Sherlock Holmes as a possible nominee !

    22. Ryan Adams November 26th, 2009 at 8:39 am 22

      My top choices for cooler substitutions would be A Single Man, (500) Days of Summer, A Serious Man, Bright Star. And for popular appeal — Julie & Julia or Star Trek.

      If I start to wish for a foreign language film to be included — A Prophet, or The White Ribbon, even Mother — then that would start to carve into some pretty solid locks — Precious, Invictus. And that might be ok with me because both those international films are among the best of the decade and the two American movies, I suspect, are not. But that’s where the system starts to show its weakness, so I politely look away.

      This is the best use of 10 nominations the Academy can come up with? The Gurus chart is dull as a brick. Happy Thanksgiving! Have a heaping second helping of the same ol’ same ol’. All the safe mediocrity you’ve come to expect from the Oscars — only this year, twice as much of it.

    23. Ryan Adams November 26th, 2009 at 9:07 am 23

      I wonder if that can be David Ansen’s full review. Surely not. Three paragraphs — and two of those are plot synopsis. There’s only one sentence that expresses a critical appraisal. Honestly, couldn’t anybody have written much the same thing based on what we already knew?

      It’s clear he liked it, and that’s good news. But this isn’t a review, is it?

    24. Jeremie November 26th, 2009 at 9:09 am 24

      Somebody sounds a bit bitter… It would be a perfect world if your wish list could come true, Ryan.
      If In the loop, A Prophet, The White Ribbon, A single Man, Bright Star, A serious Man could make it for sure, it would be amazing indeed. But I agree we know what to expect from the Oscars.
      But who knows, we might be surprised. And that’s the point, isn’t it ?

    25. Noah R. November 26th, 2009 at 9:38 am 25

      Not bad, but in a perfect world, we’d be seeing Antichrist, A Serious Man and In the Loop up there. C’est la vie. As for 3-D, it’s a gimmick. We’re all being told it’s the future of cinema because of piracy. The Avatar propaganda is rather reprehensible to the point that I almost don’t want to indulge it: “If you don’t make it a hit, you’ll ruin the film industry.” Bullshit. I’ll see Avatar if I feel like it, don’t use scare tactics to make me go.

    26. Hunter November 26th, 2009 at 9:43 am 26

      @ Jeremie. None of those people have seen Sherlock Holmes yet. It has only been screened for industry and long-lead people like TIME and NEWSWEEK. Warners are keeping it under wraps due to the name of the actor who plays Moriarty in the last scene.

    27. bambi November 26th, 2009 at 9:52 am 27

      #26 “Warners are keeping it under wraps due to the name of the actor who plays Moriarty in the last scene.”

      Celebrity cameo that will have people talking? Like Cruise in Tropic Thunder but better? Or is it that one of the principal cast is both Moriarty and someone else, the Fight Club type of the deal? This movie can`t come soon enough!

    28. Craig November 26th, 2009 at 10:12 am 28

      Bright Star doesn’t have a chance in hell at a nomination. Sorry.

    29. Jeremie November 26th, 2009 at 10:32 am 29

      #26 “Warners are keeping it under wraps due to the name of the actor who plays Moriarty in the last scene.”

      !! Spoiler !! (just in case, do not read any further)

      So why everybody knows it’s Brad Pitt then? It is not really a secret any more. It has been all over the internet, and Empire mentions it as well a few issues ago.
      And why do they have Invictus, Avatar and The Lovely Bones in their top 10 even if, as Sasha pointed it, most of them haven’t seen them yet?

      Just because Sherlock Holmes is not going to make it.
      If you just play the trailer by changing the names of the characters, it just looks like The Mummy or another bad adaptation of Extraordinary League Of Gentleman. Don’t get me wrong, it does look like it could be silly fun, but definitely not a film that has any chance to get any Oscars. Even with 10 nominees.

      It just looks sterilized and impersonal, like any big action Hollywood buddy films, making sure to to remove all the relevant Britishness of the characters so it can appeal to a wider international audience. Just the fact that Downey Jr is playing Holmes and Pitt Moriarty is laughable when there are dozens of British actors who’d been much better.

      And sorry for asking again, but what are your sources for all these secret Oscars probabilities and Warner marketing strategies. I’m still really curious to find out.

    30. Hunter November 26th, 2009 at 11:10 am 30

      Jeremie, your fears would be allayed if you have read the script. It’s not a big action Hollywood buddy movie at all. Imagine The Man Who Would Be King meets, well, The Hound of the Baskervilles. It’s absolutely faithful to the Holmes Canon. It has comedic elements, and action set-pieces, but at its heart it is a good, old-fashioned adventure story. I admit the trailer is misleading, but it seems to be working, as it has a far higher First Choice rating than Avatar.

      As for my sources, well, most people here know my real name, so they wouldn’t remain sources much longer if I revealed them.

      Happy Thanksgiving!

    31. Jeremie November 26th, 2009 at 11:18 am 31

      I guess I’ll have to trust your words. And I can only be surprised, that’s always the advantage of having low expectations. But if it is nominated indeed, I will eat my hat.

    32. bambi November 26th, 2009 at 11:54 am 32

      I`m loving that cameo. That perosn is really tkaing cool roles these days instead of just playing up his good looks. I hope it works out grand.

    33. John O'Neil November 26th, 2009 at 12:31 pm 33

      I’m starting to wonder if “An Education” is as safe as many of these pundits are predicting. The buzz seems to have evaporated. No one is really talking about it anymore.

    34. Vermicious Knid November 26th, 2009 at 2:22 pm 34

      God, I hope Sherlock Holmes is better than it looks, but I have so very little faith.

    35. j November 26th, 2009 at 3:48 pm 35

      I think 500 would be a worse BP nominee than Crash. And I hate Crash.

      Looking at each pundit’s T5:
      Precious & Up in the Air’s votes are all T5 so must have the same score as each other. Presumably -5 for each vote, so…63. Huge difference betw these and the next down.
      Locker 28 (11 votes) & Invictus 26 (8); Education 15 (7) & Up 12 (7)
      Nine 8 (6), Bones 4 (3), Avatar 3 (2), Serious 2 (1) (Basterds 0)

      I’m guessing Up in the Air will have much, much better reviews than Precious, but Precious will have the whole white guilt thing going for it a la Crash vs. Brokeback.

    36. Brady November 27th, 2009 at 1:56 am 36

      I just wanted to point out that none of the people voted picked all 10 of those movies for their top 10. I’m still pulling for Nine though!

    37. Andrew November 27th, 2009 at 4:54 am 37

      I want Bright Star in the BP race. I dont get why its such a long shot. Generally great reviews and has all the ingredients of Oscar-bait. Can someone enlighten me?? Could it be the lack of a big studio to campaign for it (like Miramax did for Campion’s The Piano)+—————-

    38. julius November 27th, 2009 at 7:05 am 38

      i’m going with District 9, Precious, Hurt Lucker, A Serious Man, Invictus, Informant, Inglourious Basterds, Avatar, Lovely Bones and finally Nine.

      i have 3 picks. Hurt Lucker, A Serious Man and Nine

    39. Ivan November 27th, 2009 at 9:44 am 39

      For Your Consideration

      BEST ACTOR
      John Malcovich/Disgrace

    40. Manuel November 27th, 2009 at 6:52 pm 40

      Im going with:

      A Single Man
      The Hurt Locker
      The Road
      Avatar
      Nine
      The Lovely Bones
      Precious
      A Serious Man
      Inglourious Basterds
      White Ribbon

      but THAT will probably never happen

    41. JR November 27th, 2009 at 9:15 pm 41

      Too many high bets for An Education. Aside from the rave reviews for Carey Mulligan, not that many people are talking about the film and some people didn’t feel for the story the way they wanted to. More importantly, how many people actually went to see the film?.

      Not calling it out of the Best Picture race, but for these charts to have it in the top 5 is a little strange. Up is another film I’m not too sure about.

    42. K. Bowen November 28th, 2009 at 8:19 am 42

      The absence of Bright Star is a giant, credibility-killing wound on this list.

      An Education is vastly overrated.

    43. nixon November 30th, 2009 at 12:03 pm 43

      Nothing beats slumdog


    Leave a reply


    All comments should respect the Awards Daily House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please let us know, quoting the comment in question.



    • 82nd Oscar Ceremony

      Hosts: Steve Martin and Alec Baldwin
      Producers: Adam Shankman, Bill Mechanic
      Director: Hamish Hamilton
      Music: Marc Shaiman

      Quentin Tarantino
      Pedro Almodovar

      Ampas Breakdown

      Actors-1,205
      Producers-462
      Executives-436
      Sound-405
      Writers-382
      Art Directors-373
      Directors-375
      Public Relations-370
      Members at Large-254
      Shorts/Feature Ani-335
      Visual Effects-272
      Music-233
      Editors-227
      Cinematographers-201
      Original Score-234
      Documentary-145
      Makeup-115
      Total Voting Members -approx 5,777


    • 82nd Oscar Ceremony

      Hosts: Steve Martin and Alec Baldwin
      Producers: Adam Shankman, Bill Mechanic
      Director: Hamish Hamilton
      Music: Marc Shaiman

      Quentin Tarantino
      Pedro Almodovar

    • Tuesday, December 1, 2009: Official Screen Credits forms due

      Monday, December 28, 2009: Nominations ballots mailed

      Saturday, January 23, 2010: Nominations polls close 5 p.m. PT

      Tuesday, February 2, 2010: Nominations announced 5:30 a.m. PT, Samuel Goldwyn Theater

      Wednesday, February 10, 2010: Final ballots mailed

      Monday, February 15, 2010: Nominees Luncheon

      Saturday, February 20, 2010: Scientific and Technical Achievement Awards presentation

      Tuesday, March 2, 2010: Final polls close 5 p.m. PT

      Sunday, March 7, 2010: 82nd Annual Academy Awards presentation



    • Twitter
      Facebook
      RSS





    • Words

      “I caught The Hurt Locker again last night. What a great film. Kathryn Bigelow is probably the most deserving of the nominees. I think if Cameron does pull off the upset, I don’t think sexism will be the problem. I think box office receipts and a concern with AMPAS trying to be “relevant” with the general public will be the actual result. Which brings me to this issue:

      I do not understand why some critics out there think that the Academy should pick films that are more mainstream? I heard a commentator the other day saying that the 2008 (No Country for Old Men) ceremony was one of the most boring telecasts in the Academy’s history. Yes, it had their lowest ratings ever. But even if this makes me come off as snobbish, that explanation is a bunch of horseshit. 2007 was a great year in movies, and if LCD (lowest common denominator) critics and audiences don’t like it, tough.

      Since I consider myself a film buff, it doesn’t bother me when the Academy pick films that general audiences may have a problem with. Let us be honest, your average film goer usually does not have the greatest taste in the world. And “difficult” films are usually more profound and original.

      On a side note, I finally got around to seeing Julie & Julia this morning. Meryl Streep SHOULD NOT win the Oscar this year. That performance was ok, but not her greatest. Her performance in Doubt was a lot better. Mulligan and Sidibe should be the two actresses vying for the award, but that certainly is not the case. Honestly, I think I will be disappointed if Streep or Bullock win this year. Neither performance was that spectacular, in relation to the competition.”
      by Sam
    • Recent Comments

    • Contender Tracker

      Awards So Far

      NBR Winner+
      /top ten*
      LAFCA Winner+
      BFCA Critics Choice Win+/Nominee*
      NYFCC Winner +/*
      SEFCA Winners+/*
      Golden Globes Nominee+/*
      SAG Winner+/Nominee*
      National Society of Film Critics winners+
      Producers Guild Winner+/Nominees*
      Directors Guild Winners+/Nominees*
      Art Directors Guild Nominees*
      Writers Guild Nominees*
      American Cinematographers Society*
      American Cinema Editors*
      Cinema Audio Society*
      BAFTA Nominations*


      Best Picture
      The Hurt Locker*+++**+++******
      Avatar*+********
      Inglourious Basterds***+****
      Up in the Air+*+*******
      Precious******
      District 9*****
      A Serious Man*****
      An Education*****
      Up****
      The Blind Side

      Best Actor
      Jeff Bridges, Crazy Heart++++*
      George Clooney, Up in the Air+*++***
      Jeremy Renner, The Hurt Locker**+*
      Colin Firth, A Single Man****
      Morgan Freeman, Invictus+***

      Best Actress
      Sandra Bullock, The Blind Side+++
      Meryl Streep, Julie & Julia++++**
      Carey Mulligan, An Education+****
      Gabby Sidibe, Precious****
      Helen Mirren, The Last Station**

      Best Supporting Actor
      Christoph Waltz, Inglourious Basterds+++++++*
      Woody Harrelson,The Messenger+***
      Stanley Tucci, The Lovely Bones****
      Matt Damon, Invictus***
      Christopher Plummer, The Last Station*

      Best Supporting Actress
      Mo'Nique, Precious+*+++++*
      Anna Kendrick, Up in the Air+****
      Vera Farmiga, Up in the Air****
      Penelope Cruz, Nine**
      Maggie Gyllenhaal, Crazy Heart

      Best Director
      Kathryn Bigelow, The Hurt Locker++++*++*
      Jim Cameron, Avatar*+**
      Quentin Tarantino, Inglourious Basterds****
      Jason Reitman, Up in the Air***
      Lee Daniels, Precious**

      Best Original Screenplay
      Quentin Tarantino, Inglourious Basterds+*
      Joel and Ethan Coen, A Serious Man+*+*
      Mark Boal, The Hurt Locker***
      Bob Peterson, Pete Docter, Up*
      Oren Moverman, Alessandro Camo The Messenger

      Best Adapted Screenplay
      Jason Reitman, Sheldon Turner, Up in the Air+++++*
      Armando Iannucci, In the Loop+
      Geoffrey Fletcher, Precious**
      Neill Blomkamp, Terri Tatchell, District 9**
      Nick Hornby, An Education*

      Best Editing

      Stephen Rivkin, John Refoua, James Cameron, Avatar+**
      Chris Innis, Bob Murawski, The Hurt Locker***
      Julian Clarke, District 9**
      Joe Klotz, Precious
      Sally Menke, Inglourious Basterds**

      Best Cinematography
      Mauro Fiore, Avatar+**
      Christian Berger, White Ribbon+++*
      Barry Ackroyd, The Hurt Locker***
      Robert Richardson, Inglourious Basterds***
      Bruno Delbonnel, Harry Potter

      Best Art Direction

      Avatar+**
      Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus*
      Nine*
      Sherlock Holmes
      The Young Victoria

      Best Sound Mixing

      Avatar+**
      The Hurt Locker***
      Star Trek* **
      Inglourious Basterds
      Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen*

      Best Sound Editing

      Avatar
      The Hurt Locker
      Up
      Star Trek
      Inglourious Basterds

      Best Costume Design
      Sandy Powell, The Young Victoria +*
      Catherine Leterrier,Coco Avant Chanel*
      Janet Patterson, Bright Star**
      Colleen Atwood, Nine*
      Monique Prudhomme, The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus

      Best Original Score
      Michael Giacchino, Up+*
      Marco Beltrami and Buck Sanders, The Hurt Locker!
      James Horner, Avatar*
      Alexandre Desplat, The Fantastic Mr. Fox
      Hans Zimmer, Sherlock Holmes*

      Best Foreign Language Film (submissions)

      A Prophet, France+*
      The White Ribbon, Germany**
      El Secreto de Sus Ojos, Argentina
      Ajami, Israel
      The Milk of Sorrow, Pru


      Best Documentary Feature

      The Cove++**+
      Food, Inc.**
      The Beaches of Agnes++*
      Burma VJ*
      The Most Dangerous Man in America
      Which Way Home


      Best Animated Feature
      Up+++**
      The Fantastic Mr. Fox+*+***
      Coraline****
      The Princess and the Frog***
      The Secret of Kells

      Best Visual Effects

      Avatar+*
      District 9* *
      Star Trek**

      Best Makeup

      The Young Victoria**
      Star Trek*

      Il Divo*


      Best Song
      The Weary Kind – T Bone Burnett, Ryan Bingham, Crazy Heart ++
      Down in New Orleans, The Princess and the Frog
      Almost There – Randy Newman, The Princess And The Frog***
      Loin de Paname, Paris 36

      Best Live Action Short
      The Door
      Instead of Abracadabra
      Kavi
      Miracle Fish
      The New Tenants


      Best Animated Short
      French Roast
      Granny O’Grimm’s Sleeping Beauty
      The Lady and the Reaper (La Dama y la Muerte)
      Logorama
      A Matter of Loaf and Death


      Best Documentary Short

      China’s Unnatural Disaster: The Tears of Sichuan Province
      The Last Campaign of Governor Booth Gardner
      The Last Truck: Closing of a GM Plant
      Music by Prudence
      Rabbit a la Berlin