Apparently, this was sent to subscribers only, while the Twilight cover hit the news stands.
I don’t know if this is their “official” Oscar issue or not – it’s the beginning of December so maybe it is. It can’t be. Their official issue will either have to have Heath Ledger and the Dark Knight crew on it or else the Benjamin Button crew. Milk might also take it. Then again, it could be Slumdog? Can they sell magazines with Danny Boyle and non-stars? Hm. My money is on Ben Button – Pitt and Blanchett.
This week, Meryl Streep is on the cover and our friends over at Oh No They Didn’t has posted scans of the Streep article, along with a Best Pic rundown of how the films stand. We already know which films Karger chose but it’s interesting to read the “why it gets in, why it doesn’t” parts.
They also have a thermometer of the actors and I swear it looks like Sally Hawkins where Kristin Scott Thomas should be. Have a look at the cover and the Oscar bits after the cut but if you’d like to see the whole thing, go to ONTD.
No Response for "EW’s Puts Streep on the Cover for Subscribers Only"
You apparently only get the “Meryl” cover if you are a subscriber. If you buy it in the stores it has the guy from Twilight on the cover. I know this has nothing to do with what you wrote, I just think it’s sad that Meryl got bumped for Twilight.
I agree.
Streep is also #11 on EW’s Entertainers of the Year list, ahead of Richard Jenkins, Jon Hamm, Elizabeth Banks, WALL-E and James Franco.
(Downey Jr. is #1.)
Meryl deserves every single praise. She is just amazing. And she is so down to earth. It is always pleasure to watch her interviews on TV. I think two other actresses who may become Meryl of their generations (even though they are more or less the same generation) are Kate Winslet and Cate Blanchett. They are good at whatever they do.
Sasha, that does look like Sally Hawkins! (Then again, it also looks like Chloe Sevigny where Winslet should be, so it could be just a trick of the eye.)
nope. I have the issue and it is Sally Hawkins. Oh EW, why?
I think in this magazine there was an error is Sally Hawkins under the name Scott Thomas, what happened here, but with Hawkins and Scott Thomas must be on the list ahead of Beckinsale and Leo.
The list was surely Streep, Blanchett, Winslet, Hawkins, Scott Thomas, Hathaway, Leo.
There should be a clarification.
what’s that weird shadow on Meryl’s face? it’s off-putting.
That Hawkins/Scott Thomas mix-up is hilarious! I guess they’re able to mention 9 contenders this way :-p
Got my copy on Friday!
It is Sally Hawkins with Thomas’ name.
It’s just very funny when you think about how VERY different those two roles were this year. I started imagining Poppy as the star of I’ve Loved You So Long. Now that would be interesting.
[...] Fonte: http://www.awardsdaily.com/?p=4393 [...]
It’s weird too because I saw both those movies on the same day.
That is weird; I too saw Happy-Go-Lucky and I’ve Loved You So Long on the same day! I saw Happy-Go-Lucky first, though.
Leave a reply
All comments should respect the Awards Daily House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please let us know, quoting the comment in question.