Quantcast

Wall-E Anticipates 30 Billion on Toy Revenue

Posted by Susan Thea Posnock On June - 12 - 2008

It turns out that Wall-E is far more marketable than last year’s beloved rat. The potential for Wall-E coin was laid out at the Licensing Show Expo, as Variety reports:

Mouse House is banking big on “Wall-E” toys and other merchandise to generate some $30 billion in retail coin this year. Mouse House’s “Wall-E” push encompasses everything from pricey deluxe robots to branded “Wall-E” Crocs shoes that leave caterpillar-tread-like tracks.

Disney hopes the story of cute robot Wall-E will be much more translatable into licensing coin than was last year’s Pixar pic, “Ratatouille,” which may have wowed critics but left licensees less charmed by the pic’s rodent motif.

It is a reality these days, folks. It is a relief to see, however, that they backed the rat even though he wouldn’t make very good Crocs or plushies. They’re just mammals, folks. Not unlike you and me. Humans carry diseases too. Lots of them.

This is a good time to remind ourselves that, though cute and our friend already, Wall-E remains a cash cow. Perhaps the sequel ought to be the story of a Disney character who wants to break free of the merchandising and finds himself going on strike. He puts his robot foot down: I am NOT for sale! Well, isn’t that what Toy Story is all about anyway? Sort of? Merchandising is inevitable. In fact, it’s become so pervasive in the kid world that it’s almost impossible to find toys, backpacks, clothes that aren’t branded by some character or film. This is hardly exclusive to the US; it’s everywhere. Who are we but what we buy?

Okay, it’s way too early to go off on a crazy rant. Wall-E toys. Coming soon to a Toys R-Us near you just in time for Christmas. You can also build your own Wall-E at Wall-E Builder’s Group. Who thought that up?

  • Filed under: ANIMATED FEATURE
  • |
  • Tags:

  • Casino Online



    No Response for "Wall-E Anticipates 30 Billion on Toy Revenue"

    1. cjKennedy June 12th, 2008 at 9:14 am 1

      I’m fully on board with Wall-E, but I have to say this kind of thing leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

      Not that this happened here, but as soon as they start making creative decisions based on how many toys they can sell they might as well just be making Transformers 2.

    2. Ryan Adams June 12th, 2008 at 9:39 am 2

      “I’m fully on board with Wall-E, but I have to say this kind of thing leaves a bad taste in my mouth.”

      They’re way ahead of you, Craig.

      NEW ORAL B KIDS DISNEY WALL-E ROBOT TOOTHBRUSH

      I’m tellin ya, E.P.T. missed the boat when they passed up the “Piss on Juno” Pregnancy Stick.

    3. Sasha Stone June 12th, 2008 at 9:41 am 3

      Yeah I know. On the other hand, they did release and back Ratatouille anyway, even though it had no marketing potential. Wall-E would be here with or without the marketing tie-ins. And anyway, where children’s media is concerned there is no line drawn. There is simply too much money to be made and I don’t know any film company that is in the business of NOT making money on purpose.

    4. RRA wants his 30 Billion Dollars June 12th, 2008 at 9:55 am 4

      You know, from what I’ve heard about the movie, unless I’m mistaken, WALL-E is pure early 70s sci-fi………………..and if you know what I’m talking about, then I wonder if WALL-E will be the child-friendly, cuddly flick that people are assuming it will be, then imagine the backlash.

    5. Sam Juliano June 12th, 2008 at 10:08 am 5

      I don’t have any choice but to feign excitement for WALL-E. There are five voices in my midst telling me what I must do, but to be honest I expected the worst with KUNG FU PANDA, and that was a pleasant surprise, even if I was telegraphed that probability with the initial reviews.
      Sasha, that is a very good point you make with RATATOUILLE, which made it solely on its intrinsic artistic quality as opposed to elaborate promotion.

    6. Ryan Adams June 12th, 2008 at 10:24 am 6

      “that is a very good point you make with RATATOUILLE, which made it solely on its intrinsic artistic quality as opposed to elaborate promotion.”

      Was that the point? My feeling about ancillary merchandise is that the movie sells the junk, not the other way around.

      I don’t know any kids who beg to go see a movie because they love the Happy Meal. (though to be honest, I should just say “I don’t know any kids.” Period.)

      The movie will make its impression long before the junk hits the shelves (and, subsequently, the dumpster.)

      If the movie’s a dud, good luck with the junk. On the other hand, no good movie needs a lot of plastic crap to make its millions. I guess I’m a capitalist, because I don’t see the problem. These toys will be landfill (or priceless collectibles) 20 years from now. The movies are what endure.

    7. RRA is a Rat June 12th, 2008 at 10:31 am 7

      “I don’t have any choice but to feign excitement for WALL-E. ”

      Then don’t feign excitement for it then, Sam Juliano.

      Jesus, unless you work at Pixar or Disney, you don’t have to do anything.

      Either the movie will be good for you, or it won’t. A film is what it is, and nothing more.

      Of course, this is RRA the open-minded and very opinionated monster, so what do I know?

    8. Sam Juliano June 12th, 2008 at 10:41 am 8

      Ryan, I respect your valid sentiments, but that is not at all what I was saying here when I responded to something Sasha said. I was basically expressing that I completed agreed with what Sasha was implying, and I still do.

      I was taking the original suppositions a step further in another direction. RATATOUILLE made it big without the kind of months-long promotion that WALL-E is getting, solely because it is a superlative animated film, that built momentum from great reviews and splendid word-of-mouth.
      If I misconstrued Sasha’s comment above (submission #3) it was in the spirit of basic agreement. I don’t doubt that “the movie sells the junk” I only pose to make claim that there are instances where a film will make it on its excellence, regardless of its inherent sell through.

    9. Sam Juliano June 12th, 2008 at 10:46 am 9

      In regard to Comment #7 above, what did I say that would result in that kind of a comment???? I submitted a very modest, non-confrontational, and timid disclaimer that was polite and non-aggressive.

      OK “rat” I can’t wait to see WALL-E, I don’t know if I’ll make it until it opens, I will think about it everyday and I will talk about it with my friends every waking second!

      Are you happy now?

    10. K Trout June 12th, 2008 at 1:33 pm 10

      $30-billion? Can we change his name from WALL-E to EXXON?…

    11. RichardA June 12th, 2008 at 6:17 pm 11

      Hug plush toys as you much, but still they don’t hug back.

    12. cjKennedy June 12th, 2008 at 7:52 pm 12

      Ryan. All I can say is “ahahahahahahah” Err…waitaminute, that’s not a toothbrush, it’s for girls and…

      Sasha. Lookit you with the glass all half full and stuff! You’re right of course. Pixar’s integrity has never been in question. I have to say though, ever since they got in bed with Micky Mouse, I’ve been keeping a careful eye on them. Cars 2 and Toy Story 3 worry me. I’m just saying. I’m also just saying: Wall-E, I’m there opening night. Sherman Oaks Arclight! (screw you El Capitain!)

      Also Sam, I fully support your ennui for Wall-E even though I don’t share it. If I had spawn and got dragged to every two bit animated pile, I’d probably find Pixar somewhat less magical.

    13. Sam Juliano June 12th, 2008 at 8:02 pm 13

      Thanks Craig. To be honest, I hope my trepidation is completely unfounded, especially since I am a sci-fi fan, and Pixar has had a solid track record. In the end, I may well be singing its praises, as I did with KUNG FU PANDA.

    14. Proman June 13th, 2008 at 7:37 pm 14

      So, basically, if Wall-E was a female instead of a robot, it’d be called a sl…

      Nevermind.

      Are we sure Lucas wasn’t producing this?


    Leave a reply


    All comments should respect the Awards Daily House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please let us know, quoting the comment in question.



    • 82nd Oscar Ceremony

      Hosts: Steve Martin and Alec Baldwin
      Producers: Adam Shankman, Bill Mechanic
      Director: Hamish Hamilton
      Music: Marc Shaiman

      Quentin Tarantino
      Pedro Almodovar

      Ampas Breakdown

      Actors-1,205
      Producers-462
      Executives-436
      Sound-405
      Writers-382
      Art Directors-373
      Directors-375
      Public Relations-370
      Members at Large-254
      Shorts/Feature Ani-335
      Visual Effects-272
      Music-233
      Editors-227
      Cinematographers-201
      Original Score-234
      Documentary-145
      Makeup-115
      Total Voting Members -approx 5,777


    • 82nd Oscar Ceremony

      Hosts: Steve Martin and Alec Baldwin
      Producers: Adam Shankman, Bill Mechanic
      Director: Hamish Hamilton
      Music: Marc Shaiman

      Quentin Tarantino
      Pedro Almodovar

    • Tuesday, December 1, 2009: Official Screen Credits forms due

      Monday, December 28, 2009: Nominations ballots mailed

      Saturday, January 23, 2010: Nominations polls close 5 p.m. PT

      Tuesday, February 2, 2010: Nominations announced 5:30 a.m. PT, Samuel Goldwyn Theater

      Wednesday, February 10, 2010: Final ballots mailed

      Monday, February 15, 2010: Nominees Luncheon

      Saturday, February 20, 2010: Scientific and Technical Achievement Awards presentation

      Tuesday, March 2, 2010: Final polls close 5 p.m. PT

      Sunday, March 7, 2010: 82nd Annual Academy Awards presentation



    • Twitter
      Facebook
      RSS





    • Words

      “I think, of all the films this year… maybe “The Hurt Locker” too… “Up in the Air” will be considered the definitive film of 2009 when we look back in 2019. It’s too raw for people to appreciate now. I’m thinking of 1976 when the Best Picture Award went to “Rocky” over both “Network” and “Taxi Driver” which are far superior films, but “Rocky” struck the populist chord (“Avatar”). “Up in the Air” is similar to “Network” in that regard, because it’s taking a very sharp knife to the world it’s trying to dissect, yet still conveys fairly human emotions. In ten years we’ll be thinking, “how did they not pick ‘Up in the Air’ for best picture?” Of course I’m assuming it loses, but maybe it still has a chance… who knows.

      I for one was absolutely captivated and riveted by it, and would love for it to get recognition it deserves. Great Film.”
      by jnow
    • Recent Comments

    • Contender Tracker

      Awards So Far

      NBR Winner+
      /top ten*
      LAFCA Winner+
      BFCA Critics Choice Win+/Nominee*
      NYFCC Winner +/*
      SEFCA Winners+/*
      Golden Globes Nominee+/*
      SAG Winner+/Nominee*
      National Society of Film Critics winners+
      Producers Guild Winner+/Nominees*
      Directors Guild Winners+/Nominees*
      Art Directors Guild Nominees*
      Writers Guild Nominees*
      American Cinematographers Society*
      American Cinema Editors*
      Cinema Audio Society*
      BAFTA Nominations*


      Best Picture
      The Hurt Locker*+++**+++******
      Avatar*+********
      Inglourious Basterds***+****
      Up in the Air+*+*******
      Precious******
      District 9*****
      A Serious Man*****
      An Education*****
      Up****
      The Blind Side

      Best Actor
      Jeff Bridges, Crazy Heart++++*
      George Clooney, Up in the Air+*++***
      Jeremy Renner, The Hurt Locker**+*
      Colin Firth, A Single Man****
      Morgan Freeman, Invictus+***

      Best Actress
      Sandra Bullock, The Blind Side+++
      Meryl Streep, Julie & Julia++++**
      Carey Mulligan, An Education+****
      Gabby Sidibe, Precious****
      Helen Mirren, The Last Station**

      Best Supporting Actor
      Christoph Waltz, Inglourious Basterds+++++++*
      Woody Harrelson,The Messenger+***
      Stanley Tucci, The Lovely Bones****
      Matt Damon, Invictus***
      Christopher Plummer, The Last Station*

      Best Supporting Actress
      Mo'Nique, Precious+*+++++*
      Anna Kendrick, Up in the Air+****
      Vera Farmiga, Up in the Air****
      Penelope Cruz, Nine**
      Maggie Gyllenhaal, Crazy Heart

      Best Director
      Kathryn Bigelow, The Hurt Locker++++*++*
      Jim Cameron, Avatar*+**
      Quentin Tarantino, Inglourious Basterds****
      Jason Reitman, Up in the Air***
      Lee Daniels, Precious**

      Best Original Screenplay
      Quentin Tarantino, Inglourious Basterds+*
      Joel and Ethan Coen, A Serious Man+*+*
      Mark Boal, The Hurt Locker***
      Bob Peterson, Pete Docter, Up*
      Oren Moverman, Alessandro Camo The Messenger

      Best Adapted Screenplay
      Jason Reitman, Sheldon Turner, Up in the Air+++++*
      Armando Iannucci, In the Loop+
      Geoffrey Fletcher, Precious**
      Neill Blomkamp, Terri Tatchell, District 9**
      Nick Hornby, An Education*

      Best Editing

      Stephen Rivkin, John Refoua, James Cameron, Avatar+**
      Chris Innis, Bob Murawski, The Hurt Locker***
      Julian Clarke, District 9**
      Joe Klotz, Precious
      Sally Menke, Inglourious Basterds**

      Best Cinematography
      Mauro Fiore, Avatar+**
      Christian Berger, White Ribbon+++*
      Barry Ackroyd, The Hurt Locker***
      Robert Richardson, Inglourious Basterds***
      Bruno Delbonnel, Harry Potter

      Best Art Direction

      Avatar+**
      Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus*
      Nine*
      Sherlock Holmes
      The Young Victoria

      Best Sound Mixing

      Avatar+**
      The Hurt Locker***
      Star Trek* **
      Inglourious Basterds
      Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen*

      Best Sound Editing

      Avatar
      The Hurt Locker
      Up
      Star Trek
      Inglourious Basterds

      Best Costume Design
      Sandy Powell, The Young Victoria +*
      Catherine Leterrier,Coco Avant Chanel*
      Janet Patterson, Bright Star**
      Colleen Atwood, Nine*
      Monique Prudhomme, The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus

      Best Original Score
      Michael Giacchino, Up+*
      Marco Beltrami and Buck Sanders, The Hurt Locker!
      James Horner, Avatar*
      Alexandre Desplat, The Fantastic Mr. Fox
      Hans Zimmer, Sherlock Holmes*

      Best Foreign Language Film (submissions)

      A Prophet, France+*
      The White Ribbon, Germany**
      El Secreto de Sus Ojos, Argentina
      Ajami, Israel
      The Milk of Sorrow, Pru


      Best Documentary Feature

      The Cove++**+
      Food, Inc.**
      The Beaches of Agnes++*
      Burma VJ*
      The Most Dangerous Man in America
      Which Way Home


      Best Animated Feature
      Up+++**
      The Fantastic Mr. Fox+*+***
      Coraline****
      The Princess and the Frog***
      The Secret of Kells

      Best Visual Effects

      Avatar+*
      District 9* *
      Star Trek**

      Best Makeup

      The Young Victoria**
      Star Trek*

      Il Divo*


      Best Song
      The Weary Kind – T Bone Burnett, Ryan Bingham, Crazy Heart ++
      Down in New Orleans, The Princess and the Frog
      Almost There – Randy Newman, The Princess And The Frog***
      Loin de Paname, Paris 36

      Best Live Action Short
      The Door
      Instead of Abracadabra
      Kavi
      Miracle Fish
      The New Tenants


      Best Animated Short
      French Roast
      Granny O’Grimm’s Sleeping Beauty
      The Lady and the Reaper (La Dama y la Muerte)
      Logorama
      A Matter of Loaf and Death


      Best Documentary Short

      China’s Unnatural Disaster: The Tears of Sichuan Province
      The Last Campaign of Governor Booth Gardner
      The Last Truck: Closing of a GM Plant
      Music by Prudence
      Rabbit a la Berlin