Quantcast

Lars and the Vile Girl

Posted by Ryan Adams On May - 19 - 2009

scissor-sisters
Scissor Sisters

New York Magazine has more about the Lars Von Trier controversy, first describing yesterday’s Cannes press event for Antichrist:

An indication of just how deeply its detractors despise the film: Von Trier was even booed at his press conference this afternoon, which devolved into an entertaining sadomasochistic psychodrama worthy of, well, a Lars von Trier movie.

An aggrieved British journalist kicked things off by demanding that the director “explain and justify why you made this movie.” Von Trier replied that he owed no explanations to anyone. “It’s the hand of God,” he said. “And I am the best film director in the world. I’m not sure if God is the best God in the world.” The questions were by turns hostile and placatory; Von Trier responded to everything in a hilariously smug deadpan. When someone suggested that Antichrist owed less to Tarkovsky’s arty meditations than to the B-movie schlock of Dario Argento, the director answered only with the most withering look of bewilderment and disgust. “You are all my guests,” he said at one point. “It’s not the other way around.”

For the benefit of anyone who’s still unclear about what’s got audiences so riled up, NYM runs a companion piece that paints a pretty word picture describing the most horrific scenes in grisly detail. I’ll post it after the cut, but it’s cringe-inducing stuff, so fair warning.

smashed

Read on only if you want to skip lunch and cross your legs for the rest of the day!

We suppose the following could technically be considered a spoiler, though we can’t imagine anyone would want to be taken by surprise by something like this in a movie theater. Are you sure you actually want to read this? Really? Really?? Okay!

So far, no review has gone into gruesome details, though, from what we gather, here’s how it goes down, more or less: After knocking him unconscious, Gainsbourg bores a hole in Dafoe’s leg with a hand drill and bolts him to a grindstone to keep him from escaping. Then, she smashes his scrotum with some sort of blunt object (the moment of impact happens slightly below the frame). We don’t actually see his testicles become disengaged from this body, though it’s apparently implied. Next, she brings him to a climax with her hands and he ejaculates blood (yes, it’s shown). But that’s not all! Later, in an extreme closeup — lensed by Oscar-winning Slumdog Millionaire cinematographer Anthony Dod Mantle! — Gainsbourg cuts off her own clitoris with a pair of scissors.

Worst. Date Movie. Ever.

Roger Ebert calls it “the most despairing film I’ve ever have seen.” Jeffrey Wells brands it a “fartbomb.” Movieline’s David Bourgeois says it’s “the most original and thought-provoking work von Trier has done since Breaking the Waves.” Variety’s Todd McCarthy, who must’ve been seated in the same row as Wells, says the movie “cuts a big fat art-film fart.” Our favorite reaction, though, is from the Times’s Manohla “Movie Killer” Dargis, who Ebert says he heard singing “That’s Entertainment!” as she left the theater.

  • Filed under: AWARDS CHATTER
  • |
  • Tags: ,

  • Casino Online



    30 Responses for "Lars and the Vile Girl"

    1. JAB May 19th, 2009 at 10:23 am 1

      So this will be NC-17 if they even show it in US theaters

    2. Mike May 19th, 2009 at 10:26 am 2

      Go Lars.

    3. jwright40 May 19th, 2009 at 10:28 am 3

      Ha! Yeah – go Lars.

    4. Nyc Oscar Buff May 19th, 2009 at 10:37 am 4

      Anti-Christ I think will slowly start building Internet appeal & eventually get a strong cult audience (possibly?) to contrast these bitter reviews, Lars Von Trier’s film have never pandered to mass consumption or popular reception overall.

    5. Highwayroller May 19th, 2009 at 10:42 am 5

      Yeah, show them, Lars.

    6. Nick K. (and a talking fox) May 19th, 2009 at 10:44 am 6

      Like I said earlier, little Lars just wants to get attention from all the grown-ups in the room. Let’s just let him throw a tantrum for a little while, and eventually he’ll just simmer. Then we can all have a discussion like responsible adults. This actually reminds me of a song Paul Anka once sang. I can’t find a link for it, but it was on the Simpsons. Anybody remember how it goes? :)

    7. Ryan Adams May 19th, 2009 at 10:48 am 7

      From one of The Simpsons Treehouse of Horror Halloween specials, Nick:

      Paul Anka: To stop those monsters 1-2-3,
      Here’s a fresh new way that’s trouble-free,
      It’s got Paul Anka’s guarantee…
      Lisa: Guarantee void in Tennessee.
      All: Just don’t look! Just don’t look!
      Just don’t look! Just don’t look!
      Just don’t look! Just don’t look!

    8. Aaron Leggo May 19th, 2009 at 10:55 am 8

      Wow. That sounds rough. But I’m willing to sit through anything in a movie theatre, so I’ll certainly give this a shot.

      But damn, scrotum-smashing and clitoris-clipping sounds really, really uncool.

    9. Nick K. (and a talking fox) May 19th, 2009 at 10:56 am 9

      Great job, Ryan. Couldn’t have said it better myself.

      And as for the clito-clip, whenever I hear the word ‘clitoris’, I think of the ‘South Park’ movie. ;)

    10. 1eyedjoker May 19th, 2009 at 11:13 am 10

      Clitoris s such a beautiful word.

    11. Proman May 19th, 2009 at 12:10 pm 11

      I have to say that this movie does sound intriguing. I may not be on Lars’ side AFTER I see the film but right now it sounds like Lars has delivered something worthy of a “Horror” label.
      (There is an unspoken contract between a filmmaker and his or her audience that should only be breached in very few instances.)

      I’m reminded of the reaction some people had to Miike’s “Ichi the Killer” but which I found to be far too cartoony to be offensive.

      Also, with the title like Antichrist what did the critics really expect?

    12. Paddy M May 19th, 2009 at 12:15 pm 12

      I love Lars von Trier’s films and I think Antichrist sounds bloody good, if you’ll pardon the pun.

      But please, Lars, stop acting like such an imbecile. Yes, the controversy is excellent, now that’s enough.

      GIVE YOUR FILM A CHANCE, LARS! Your petty performance at the press conference befits the controversy your film has stirred up and enhances said controversy further, but you have made this film for a reason! You have included such shocking images for a reason! Your reactions could well ruin your efforts to get this film shown anywhere, never mind the USA.

      Remember Manderlay? No? That’s because it wasn’t given a US release. One of the most successful things about Dogville was that it was shown in the US, thus serving its purpose as anti-American propaganda. It reminds me of when Michael Haneke remade Funny Games for an American audience – I’m no big fan of remakes, but for what the film was trying to say to its audience, this was a clever move indeed, increasing the size of the audience for his message.

      With Manderlay, von Trier cut even deeper into the heart of America with stunning, frightening allegory. But it wasn’t shown in the US, because of a scene which would have cost it an NC-17 certificate. I’m afraid Antichrist won’t even get shown at all…

    13. Niles May 19th, 2009 at 12:41 pm 13

      This year’s Medellin (Entourage) hahaha, that sucks Von Trier is a good director, who made films like Dancer in the Dark, and Dogville, but lately, he’s been making some not so good films. Especially this one of Anti-Christ, I mean look at the picture you can tell that the actress who played in the film is in embarrassed and disgust to even go out there, shes half French by the way. So yeah I feel bad for the whole thing. It sucks.

    14. Ryan Adams May 19th, 2009 at 12:54 pm 14

      ha, Niles. Could be Von Trier is trying to coax a concealed mallet away from Charlotte Gainsbourg.

      Or maybe she’s just not that into him.

    15. richard crawford May 19th, 2009 at 1:02 pm 15

      I adore Charlotte Gainsbourg. (she’s a wonderful singer too)

      Lars? nope….

    16. Michael May 19th, 2009 at 1:18 pm 16

      Okay this is the first Dario Argento mention I’ve heard!
      Antichrist is looking more exciting every minute. Love it.
      Lars is also hilarious through it all.

    17. Euan May 19th, 2009 at 1:40 pm 17

      Ok, I defended Lars in in the previous post the other day but it really pisses me off that he claims he doesn’t have to do likewise for himself. If you’re going to depict such scenes yes, you do have to justify yourself, if you don’t, you really do deserve most of the vitriolic criticism being piled on the film.
      And, while I wouldn’t judge the film purely on the basis of what’s mentioned above, it is pretty worrisome that a degree of respect or excitement is being earned on just that basis from some of the commentators.

    18. Casey May 19th, 2009 at 2:40 pm 18

      Lars stands behind his films so much, that even when he is booed and they are called trash and torture porn, he simply says: Thats okay. He is a true artist.

      I simply cannot wait to see Antichrist.

      This just topped Precious on my MUST SEE list (although i will see both)

    19. Clayton May 19th, 2009 at 4:45 pm 19

      I really want to see this. Sounds interesting

    20. harry May 19th, 2009 at 4:53 pm 20

      Casey,

      Since when do director’s cop to their films being crap? Even Uwe Boll is willing to fight over his movies.

    21. sartre May 19th, 2009 at 5:23 pm 21

      For those interested an audio stream of the press conference can be found at the New York Times Cannes page on the right sidebar.

      http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/c/cannes_international_film_festival/index.html

      He actually acquits himself very well. After what seemed a slightly nervous and intimidated start in the face of the much cited hostile opening assertion from a member of the press (what a self-righteous and pompous wanker) he increasingly takes control of the situation with his wit and clear-eyed intelligence. I was taken aback by the extent to which some of the press questions and comments were facile and judgmental.

      People will either see value in his latest film or not. What appears clear is that Von Trier’s film is pushing powerful buttons for some and as a result they feel the need to annihilate the artist and his work. I admire Von Trier’s bemused and black humored reaction to it.

    22. Alison Flynn May 19th, 2009 at 6:30 pm 22

      Anti-Christ I think will slowly start building Internet appeal & eventually get a strong cult audience (possibly?) to contrast these bitter reviews

      @Nyc Oscar Buff: a very strong possibility. Many people are already becoming more interested in it than they were before.

    23. Free May 19th, 2009 at 7:23 pm 23

      Well this sounds like the feel-good family hit of the year.

    24. Nick K. (and a talking fox) May 19th, 2009 at 7:49 pm 24

      @Free:

      You betcha. Talking animals and all.

    25. limeymcfrog May 19th, 2009 at 8:50 pm 25

      I would guess that those who enjoy this film will only enjoy it because it “pisses off the squares” not because of any intrinsic quality about the film itself. I can already intuit the glee in the voices of those who want to see Von Trier perform acts of iconoclasty on the human body… they aren’t really seeing the ejaculatory blood or the detatched clitoris, but the horrified look on the faces of those who “don’t get it”

      A childish act of sadism by director and audience alike.

    26. Frank J. Avella May 20th, 2009 at 2:06 am 26

      Lars rules. I cannot wait for this!

      Oh, and MANDERLAY was released in the US…it wasn’t much of one but it did get distribution.

    27. cissa May 20th, 2009 at 5:21 pm 27

      I’ve sit through irreversible, I’m not sure I wanna sit through something like this. Really. What’s the point of scenes like that? Anyone explains this to me and I may watch it.

    28. blizzards14 May 22nd, 2009 at 4:09 pm 28

      Wow! I can’t wait! Im such a big Von Trier fan….

      Pls make me see the world differently.

    29. blizzards14 May 22nd, 2009 at 4:10 pm 29

      I hope he will make movies about guys. Im willing to be tortured,

    30. Afrika May 22nd, 2009 at 4:35 pm 30

      I actually think Lars is talented and I wouldn’t have any problem with his work if it was placed in its proper category: TORTURE PORN.


    Leave a reply


    All comments should respect the Awards Daily House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please let us know, quoting the comment in question.



    • 82nd Oscar Ceremony

      Hosts: Steve Martin and Alec Baldwin
      Producers: Adam Shankman, Bill Mechanic
      Director: Hamish Hamilton
      Music: Marc Shaiman

      Quentin Tarantino
      Pedro Almodovar

      Ampas Breakdown

      Actors-1,205
      Producers-462
      Executives-436
      Sound-405
      Writers-382
      Art Directors-373
      Directors-375
      Public Relations-370
      Members at Large-254
      Shorts/Feature Ani-335
      Visual Effects-272
      Music-233
      Editors-227
      Cinematographers-201
      Original Score-234
      Documentary-145
      Makeup-115
      Total Voting Members -approx 5,777


    • 82nd Oscar Ceremony

      Hosts: Steve Martin and Alec Baldwin
      Producers: Adam Shankman, Bill Mechanic
      Director: Hamish Hamilton
      Music: Marc Shaiman

      Quentin Tarantino
      Pedro Almodovar

    • Tuesday, December 1, 2009: Official Screen Credits forms due

      Monday, December 28, 2009: Nominations ballots mailed

      Saturday, January 23, 2010: Nominations polls close 5 p.m. PT

      Tuesday, February 2, 2010: Nominations announced 5:30 a.m. PT, Samuel Goldwyn Theater

      Wednesday, February 10, 2010: Final ballots mailed

      Monday, February 15, 2010: Nominees Luncheon

      Saturday, February 20, 2010: Scientific and Technical Achievement Awards presentation

      Tuesday, March 2, 2010: Final polls close 5 p.m. PT

      Sunday, March 7, 2010: 82nd Annual Academy Awards presentation



    • Twitter
      Facebook
      RSS





    • Words

      “While I’m obviously not ruling it out, I don’t think Avatar will win Best Picture, and the new preferential voting system is precisely why. Had they stuck with just having each member vote on their favorite of the nominees, it might have won, but something tells me that there are a lot of people within the Academy who are part of the backlash against the film, and will therefore place it at #10 on their ballots. You have to keep in mind that from now on, the movie with the most #1 votes is not necessarily the movie that wins. It’s easy to imagine Avatar will get a lot of #1 votes, but it’s equally easy to imagine it will get a lot of #10 votes as well, and that will really hurt it.

      So you kind of have to think more along the lines of which movie will have the least against it, rather than the most for it. The Hurt Locker will undoubtedly get a lot of #1 votes as it is the frontrunner, and while I’m sure there will be those who put it at or near the bottom of their ballots, it seems to me that it will have a lot less low-end placements than Avatar will, and so The Hurt Locker easily has the edge over Avatar in that respect.

      Inglourious Basterds also seems like the kind of movie that will split voters. It’ll get a lot of #1 and #2 votes, but probably also a lot of #9 and #10 votes. So I don’t think it’ll win (though again, I’m not ruling it out). Precious will probably get less 9’s and 10’s, but I frankly don’t think it will get enough 1’s and 2’s to pull off a win. I think it’ll get mostly mid-range votes. Same goes for Up in the Air, though I imagine even that will get more 1’s and 2’s than Precious will.

      So to sum it up, I think The Hurt Locker, while not an absolute, no-turning-back lock, is still the clear frontrunner in this race. If we’re talking about a potential upset though, why not really factor in the new preferential voting system and try to imagine how much that could end up benefiting a film like, say, Up? While it might not get too many #1 votes, I can easily see it getting a lot of 2-4 votes, and who know? If the frontrunners all develop strong enough backlashes, then it could be that this year’s Best Picture will go not to the movie that is the most liked, but rather the movie that is the least DISliked. Just saying.”
      by Jean-Paul
    • Recent Comments

    • Contender Tracker

      Awards So Far

      NBR Winner+
      /top ten*
      LAFCA Winner+
      BFCA Critics Choice Win+/Nominee*
      NYFCC Winner +/*
      SEFCA Winners+/*
      Golden Globes Nominee+/*
      SAG Winner+/Nominee*
      National Society of Film Critics winners+
      Producers Guild Winner+/Nominees*
      Directors Guild Winners+/Nominees*
      Art Directors Guild Nominees*
      Writers Guild Nominees*
      American Cinematographers Society*
      American Cinema Editors*
      Cinema Audio Society*
      BAFTA Nominations*


      Best Picture
      The Hurt Locker*+++**+++******
      Avatar*+********
      Inglourious Basterds***+****
      Up in the Air+*+*******
      Precious******
      District 9*****
      A Serious Man*****
      An Education*****
      Up****
      The Blind Side

      Best Actor
      Jeff Bridges, Crazy Heart++++*
      George Clooney, Up in the Air+*++***
      Jeremy Renner, The Hurt Locker**+*
      Colin Firth, A Single Man****
      Morgan Freeman, Invictus+***

      Best Actress
      Sandra Bullock, The Blind Side+++
      Meryl Streep, Julie & Julia++++**
      Carey Mulligan, An Education+****
      Gabby Sidibe, Precious****
      Helen Mirren, The Last Station**

      Best Supporting Actor
      Christoph Waltz, Inglourious Basterds+++++++*
      Woody Harrelson,The Messenger+***
      Stanley Tucci, The Lovely Bones****
      Matt Damon, Invictus***
      Christopher Plummer, The Last Station*

      Best Supporting Actress
      Mo'Nique, Precious+*+++++*
      Anna Kendrick, Up in the Air+****
      Vera Farmiga, Up in the Air****
      Penelope Cruz, Nine**
      Maggie Gyllenhaal, Crazy Heart

      Best Director
      Kathryn Bigelow, The Hurt Locker++++*++*
      Jim Cameron, Avatar*+**
      Quentin Tarantino, Inglourious Basterds****
      Jason Reitman, Up in the Air***
      Lee Daniels, Precious**

      Best Original Screenplay
      Quentin Tarantino, Inglourious Basterds+*
      Joel and Ethan Coen, A Serious Man+*+*
      Mark Boal, The Hurt Locker***
      Bob Peterson, Pete Docter, Up*
      Oren Moverman, The Messenger

      Best Adapted Screenplay
      Jason Reitman, Sheldon Turner, Up in the Air+++++*
      Armando Iannucci, In the Loop+
      Geoffrey Fletcher, Precious**
      Neill Blomkamp, Terri Tatchell, District 9**
      Nick Hornby, An Education*

      Best Editing

      Stephen Rivkin, John Refoua, James Cameron, Avatar+**
      Chris Innis, Bob Murawski, The Hurt Locker***
      Julian Clarke, District 9**
      Joe Klotz, Precious
      Sally Menke, Inglourious Basterds**

      Best Cinematography
      Mauro Fiore, Avatar+**
      Christian Berger, White Ribbon+++*
      Barry Ackroyd, The Hurt Locker***
      Robert Richardson, Inglourious Basterds***
      Bruno Delbonnel, Harry Potter

      Best Art Direction

      Avatar+**
      Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus*
      Nine*
      Sherlock Holmes
      The Young Victoria

      Best Sound Mixing

      Avatar+**
      The Hurt Locker***
      Star Trek* **
      Inglourious Basterds
      Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen*

      Best Sound Editing

      Avatar
      The Hurt Locker
      Up
      Star Trek
      Inglourious Basterds

      Best Costume Design
      Sandy Powell, The Young Victoria +*
      Catherine Leterrier,Coco Avant Chanel*
      Janet Patterson, Bright Star**
      Colleen Atwood, Nine*
      Monique Prudhomme, The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus

      Best Original Score
      Michael Giacchino, Up+*
      Marco Beltrami and Buck Sanders, The Hurt Locker!
      James Horner, Avatar*
      Alexandre Desplat, The Fantastic Mr. Fox
      Hans Zimmer, Sherlock Holmes*

      Best Foreign Language Film (submissions)

      A Prophet, France+*
      The White Ribbon, Germany**
      El Secreto de Sus Ojos, Argentina
      Ajami, Israel
      The Milk of Sorrow, Pru


      Best Documentary Feature

      The Cove++**+
      Food, Inc.**
      The Beaches of Agnes++*
      Burma VJ*
      The Most Dangerous Man in America
      Which Way Home


      Best Animated Feature
      Up+++**
      The Fantastic Mr. Fox+*+***
      Coraline****
      The Princess and the Frog***
      The Secret of Kells

      Best Visual Effects

      Avatar+*
      District 9* *
      Star Trek**

      Best Makeup

      The Young Victoria**
      Star Trek*

      Il Divo*


      Best Song
      The Weary Kind – T Bone Burnett, Ryan Bingham, Crazy Heart ++
      Down in New Orleans, The Princess and the Frog
      Almost There – Randy Newman, The Princess And The Frog***
      Loin de Paname, Paris 36

      Best Live Action Short
      The Door
      Instead of Abracadabra
      Kavi
      Miracle Fish
      The New Tenants


      Best Animated Short
      French Roast
      Granny O’Grimm’s Sleeping Beauty
      The Lady and the Reaper (La Dama y la Muerte)
      Logorama
      A Matter of Loaf and Death


      Best Documentary Short

      China’s Unnatural Disaster: The Tears of Sichuan Province
      The Last Campaign of Governor Booth Gardner
      The Last Truck: Closing of a GM Plant
      Music by Prudence
      Rabbit a la Berlin