<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Awards Daily</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.awardsdaily.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.awardsdaily.com</link>
	<description>The Trick is not Minding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 08:15:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oscars 2012: MVP Campaign by John</title>
		<link>http://www.awardsdaily.com/2012/02/oscars-2012-mvp-campaign/#comment-608750</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 08:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.awardsdaily.com/?p=49211#comment-608750</guid>
		<description>Im down to hate on this slogan, its ridiculous. its annoying. but I can&#039;t say The Artist doesnt deserve the best picture of the year award. If this movie had gone under the radar and just came out of nowhere at the end of the year, then Im guessing a lot more people on here would want it to win best picture. But now that it is popular everyone seems to hate it.....Its a classic example of &quot;The Hipster Effect&quot;, saying you love something for awhile, but then when you realize everyone else is starting to like it so you decide to say you hate it too....yup classic hipster. and when I say you, I mean all the Artist haters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im down to hate on this slogan, its ridiculous. its annoying. but I can&#8217;t say The Artist doesnt deserve the best picture of the year award. If this movie had gone under the radar and just came out of nowhere at the end of the year, then Im guessing a lot more people on here would want it to win best picture. But now that it is popular everyone seems to hate it&#8230;..Its a classic example of &#8220;The Hipster Effect&#8221;, saying you love something for awhile, but then when you realize everyone else is starting to like it so you decide to say you hate it too&#8230;.yup classic hipster. and when I say you, I mean all the Artist haters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When Jessica Chastain Met Meryl Streep by Zooey</title>
		<link>http://www.awardsdaily.com/2012/02/when-jessica-chastain-met-meryl-streep/#comment-608743</link>
		<dc:creator>Zooey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 08:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.awardsdaily.com/?p=49204#comment-608743</guid>
		<description>I bet that Jessica will be the first woman of the five Oscar nominees this year (in supporting) to repeat. And I believe her Oscar is very close and in lead. She&#039;s a wonderful actor (and yes, it&#039;s true that she was the only good thing about The Debt; Sam W.&#039;s German accent in the beginning of the movie made me laugh; all due respect, but the Germans would have guesses right away that there was something there with Sam&#039;s accent haha!) and to me she delivers a knockout performance in The Help. She&#039;s the only actor other than Davis who creates a character out of a stereotype. The party crashing scene was beautiful to watch because of her. (I&#039;m not a huge admirer of Spencer.) Anyway, I repeat: why, oh why didn&#039;t you Oscar voters see Take Shelter?! The last five minutes of Jessica&#039;s performance in the movie make Jennifer Connelly look like Mariah Carey actingwise!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet that Jessica will be the first woman of the five Oscar nominees this year (in supporting) to repeat. And I believe her Oscar is very close and in lead. She&#8217;s a wonderful actor (and yes, it&#8217;s true that she was the only good thing about The Debt; Sam W.&#8217;s German accent in the beginning of the movie made me laugh; all due respect, but the Germans would have guesses right away that there was something there with Sam&#8217;s accent haha!) and to me she delivers a knockout performance in The Help. She&#8217;s the only actor other than Davis who creates a character out of a stereotype. The party crashing scene was beautiful to watch because of her. (I&#8217;m not a huge admirer of Spencer.) Anyway, I repeat: why, oh why didn&#8217;t you Oscar voters see Take Shelter?! The last five minutes of Jessica&#8217;s performance in the movie make Jennifer Connelly look like Mariah Carey actingwise!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oscar Flashback: 1968 &#8211; Oliver, a Globes Musical Comedy Wins Big by Oscar Flashback: 1968 – Oliver, a Globes Musical Comedy Wins Big &#8211; Awards Daily &#171; Free Comedy Video</title>
		<link>http://www.awardsdaily.com/2012/02/oscar-flashback-thebigsplit/#comment-608737</link>
		<dc:creator>Oscar Flashback: 1968 – Oliver, a Globes Musical Comedy Wins Big &#8211; Awards Daily &#171; Free Comedy Video</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 08:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.awardsdaily.com/?p=49227#comment-608737</guid>
		<description>[...] Oscar Flashback: 1968 – Oliver, a Globes Musical Comedy Wins BigAwards DailyThe last time a film won the Best Picture Musical Comedy at the Golden Globes then went on to win the Oscar for Best Picture and Best Director was in 1968. The film was Oliver! Despite it being 1968, one of the most tumultuous periods of history for &#8230;and more&#160;&#187; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Oscar Flashback: 1968 – Oliver, a Globes Musical Comedy Wins BigAwards DailyThe last time a film won the Best Picture Musical Comedy at the Golden Globes then went on to win the Oscar for Best Picture and Best Director was in 1968. The film was Oliver! Despite it being 1968, one of the most tumultuous periods of history for &#8230;and more&nbsp;&raquo; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oscar Flashback: 1968 &#8211; Oliver, a Globes Musical Comedy Wins Big by Rob Y</title>
		<link>http://www.awardsdaily.com/2012/02/oscar-flashback-thebigsplit/#comment-608700</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 07:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.awardsdaily.com/?p=49227#comment-608700</guid>
		<description>I was watching a rerun of Project Runway.  Nina Garcia and Michael Kohrs were discussing one designer&#039;s choice to make the standard black dress.  Their comment was that while there was not much depth to it, it was impeccably constructed.  It won that challenge.

That&#039;s what The Artist feels to me.  It is that impeccably made black dress that wins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was watching a rerun of Project Runway.  Nina Garcia and Michael Kohrs were discussing one designer&#8217;s choice to make the standard black dress.  Their comment was that while there was not much depth to it, it was impeccably constructed.  It won that challenge.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what The Artist feels to me.  It is that impeccably made black dress that wins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oscars 2012: MVP Campaign by sonny</title>
		<link>http://www.awardsdaily.com/2012/02/oscars-2012-mvp-campaign/#comment-608688</link>
		<dc:creator>sonny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 07:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.awardsdaily.com/?p=49211#comment-608688</guid>
		<description>what im saying is that you are too biased, if you have a web site that reports about the award season then you should be more objective.

2 years ago, you planted a huge campain in favor of The Hurt Locker
Last year it was all about the social network and the lame win of TKS
and now its time to bash a new major contender

I know you are entitled to you opinion, i hated avatar, didnt care much fore the hurt locker, loved TSN, didnt like TKS and liked the artist, so basically i have similar taste in films as you.

what im trying to say is, this is a news website, be more parcial, if you point out an opinion against a film is understandable... the first 20 times,,. 

but thats just an opinion...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what im saying is that you are too biased, if you have a web site that reports about the award season then you should be more objective.</p>
<p>2 years ago, you planted a huge campain in favor of The Hurt Locker<br />
Last year it was all about the social network and the lame win of TKS<br />
and now its time to bash a new major contender</p>
<p>I know you are entitled to you opinion, i hated avatar, didnt care much fore the hurt locker, loved TSN, didnt like TKS and liked the artist, so basically i have similar taste in films as you.</p>
<p>what im trying to say is, this is a news website, be more parcial, if you point out an opinion against a film is understandable&#8230; the first 20 times,,. </p>
<p>but thats just an opinion&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oscar Flashback: 1968 &#8211; Oliver, a Globes Musical Comedy Wins Big by Derek 8-Track</title>
		<link>http://www.awardsdaily.com/2012/02/oscar-flashback-thebigsplit/#comment-608664</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek 8-Track</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 07:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.awardsdaily.com/?p=49227#comment-608664</guid>
		<description>Out of all the best picture winners in the history of the Academy Awards, Oliver! is my least favorite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out of all the best picture winners in the history of the Academy Awards, Oliver! is my least favorite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oscar Flashback: 1968 &#8211; Oliver, a Globes Musical Comedy Wins Big by Benny Z</title>
		<link>http://www.awardsdaily.com/2012/02/oscar-flashback-thebigsplit/#comment-608658</link>
		<dc:creator>Benny Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.awardsdaily.com/?p=49227#comment-608658</guid>
		<description>1968 was quite a year for film. And I actually love Oliver and find it to be one of the best choices the academy made in the 60s (And I&#039;ve seen most of the films mentioned above, save for Shame and Petulia).

My top ten from &#039;68

1. 2001 A Space Odyssey
2. Rosemary&#039;s Baby
3. Oliver!
4. The Lion in Winter
5. Planet of the Apes
6. The Battle of Algiers
7. Funny Girl
8. The Swimmer
9. Pretty Poison
10. Bullitt

Honorable Mentions:
The Killing of Sister George
Wild in the Streets
Yellow Submarine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1968 was quite a year for film. And I actually love Oliver and find it to be one of the best choices the academy made in the 60s (And I&#8217;ve seen most of the films mentioned above, save for Shame and Petulia).</p>
<p>My top ten from &#8217;68</p>
<p>1. 2001 A Space Odyssey<br />
2. Rosemary&#8217;s Baby<br />
3. Oliver!<br />
4. The Lion in Winter<br />
5. Planet of the Apes<br />
6. The Battle of Algiers<br />
7. Funny Girl<br />
8. The Swimmer<br />
9. Pretty Poison<br />
10. Bullitt</p>
<p>Honorable Mentions:<br />
The Killing of Sister George<br />
Wild in the Streets<br />
Yellow Submarine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oscar Flashback: 1968 &#8211; Oliver, a Globes Musical Comedy Wins Big by John Oliver</title>
		<link>http://www.awardsdaily.com/2012/02/oscar-flashback-thebigsplit/#comment-608652</link>
		<dc:creator>John Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.awardsdaily.com/?p=49227#comment-608652</guid>
		<description>The Artist will win best picture and director , thus the best actor race is wide open  between Clooney, Dujardin &amp; Pitt, I&#039;m predicting a Dujardin win if their on an Artist roll.
I really want Pitt to win, but facts are facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Artist will win best picture and director , thus the best actor race is wide open  between Clooney, Dujardin &amp; Pitt, I&#8217;m predicting a Dujardin win if their on an Artist roll.<br />
I really want Pitt to win, but facts are facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oscar Flashback: 1968 &#8211; Oliver, a Globes Musical Comedy Wins Big by Rashad</title>
		<link>http://www.awardsdaily.com/2012/02/oscar-flashback-thebigsplit/#comment-608635</link>
		<dc:creator>Rashad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.awardsdaily.com/?p=49227#comment-608635</guid>
		<description>Bette: I was comparing Rocky to Oliver, however even keeping with comparing it to the other nominees, it&#039;s still the most popular, and most liked across the board. It still has influenced pretty much every underdog or sports story, and it&#039;s always brought up when regarding such. Hell, even last year&#039;s Oscar contender - The Fighter - borrows its template, and still isn&#039;t half as good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bette: I was comparing Rocky to Oliver, however even keeping with comparing it to the other nominees, it&#8217;s still the most popular, and most liked across the board. It still has influenced pretty much every underdog or sports story, and it&#8217;s always brought up when regarding such. Hell, even last year&#8217;s Oscar contender &#8211; The Fighter &#8211; borrows its template, and still isn&#8217;t half as good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oscars 2012: MVP Campaign by eclipse22</title>
		<link>http://www.awardsdaily.com/2012/02/oscars-2012-mvp-campaign/#comment-608633</link>
		<dc:creator>eclipse22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.awardsdaily.com/?p=49211#comment-608633</guid>
		<description>i fell asleep watching &quot;drive&quot; missed 30mn of it and funny enough it was the music that woke me up like a bang i woke up thinking wth...so yeah it happens !
i just saw THE ARTIST last night and loved it, i was impressed at how silent it is&amp;how the score weaves into the film without overshadowing the scenes, its so silent it makes you concentrate on what&#039;s going on and the performance of the actors in conveying feelings and thoughts,to me they did a great job, dujardin is the artist! berenice was good too

Hope it wins best pic, director, actor, score, screenplay!

my slogan a play on a quote from chicago 
&quot;RAZZLE DAZZLE THEM AND THEY&#039;LL GIVE YOU THE OSCAR!!!&quot; in this scene replace richard gere with harvey weinstein!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i fell asleep watching &#8220;drive&#8221; missed 30mn of it and funny enough it was the music that woke me up like a bang i woke up thinking wth&#8230;so yeah it happens !<br />
i just saw THE ARTIST last night and loved it, i was impressed at how silent it is&amp;how the score weaves into the film without overshadowing the scenes, its so silent it makes you concentrate on what&#8217;s going on and the performance of the actors in conveying feelings and thoughts,to me they did a great job, dujardin is the artist! berenice was good too</p>
<p>Hope it wins best pic, director, actor, score, screenplay!</p>
<p>my slogan a play on a quote from chicago<br />
&#8220;RAZZLE DAZZLE THEM AND THEY&#8217;LL GIVE YOU THE OSCAR!!!&#8221; in this scene replace richard gere with harvey weinstein!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oscar Flashback: 1968 &#8211; Oliver, a Globes Musical Comedy Wins Big by Mac</title>
		<link>http://www.awardsdaily.com/2012/02/oscar-flashback-thebigsplit/#comment-608631</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.awardsdaily.com/?p=49227#comment-608631</guid>
		<description>The Lion in Winter has an excellent score - what a great movie! I think the fact that the A Man For All Seasons won Best Picture the year before was likely a factor in Winter&#039;s loss. The two movies have a similar feel and setting, however The Lion in Winter is much better. Still, I&#039;m sure the Academy wanted something different, hence Oliver!

I do like Oliver! but it&#039;s not anywhere near as noteworthy as many other movies that year. It&#039;s actually funny that it&#039;s considered a comedy because it&#039;s really very dark (Bill beats Nancy to death with a cudgel and the thieve&#039;s den is a sad, rundown pit).

Another huge strike against Hugo is the fantasy element. The snobby Academy doesn&#039;t appreciate that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Lion in Winter has an excellent score &#8211; what a great movie! I think the fact that the A Man For All Seasons won Best Picture the year before was likely a factor in Winter&#8217;s loss. The two movies have a similar feel and setting, however The Lion in Winter is much better. Still, I&#8217;m sure the Academy wanted something different, hence Oliver!</p>
<p>I do like Oliver! but it&#8217;s not anywhere near as noteworthy as many other movies that year. It&#8217;s actually funny that it&#8217;s considered a comedy because it&#8217;s really very dark (Bill beats Nancy to death with a cudgel and the thieve&#8217;s den is a sad, rundown pit).</p>
<p>Another huge strike against Hugo is the fantasy element. The snobby Academy doesn&#8217;t appreciate that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When Jessica Chastain Met Meryl Streep by Oscars: Cameron Diaz Moneyball and The Artist in todays Oscar news AWARDS ALLEY Free movie - HaLa MovieHaLa Movie</title>
		<link>http://www.awardsdaily.com/2012/02/when-jessica-chastain-met-meryl-streep/#comment-608627</link>
		<dc:creator>Oscars: Cameron Diaz Moneyball and The Artist in todays Oscar news AWARDS ALLEY Free movie - HaLa MovieHaLa Movie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.awardsdaily.com/?p=49204#comment-608627</guid>
		<description>[...] star like Jessica Chastain meets a veritable icon like Meryl Streep? I love hearing about celebs getting flustered in the presence of other [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] star like Jessica Chastain meets a veritable icon like Meryl Streep? I love hearing about celebs getting flustered in the presence of other [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oscar Flashback: 1968 &#8211; Oliver, a Globes Musical Comedy Wins Big by Z Pajak</title>
		<link>http://www.awardsdaily.com/2012/02/oscar-flashback-thebigsplit/#comment-608617</link>
		<dc:creator>Z Pajak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.awardsdaily.com/?p=49227#comment-608617</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Sasha, for this rich and interesting piece.  As always, your putting years in dialog is insightful, fascinating, and uncanny.  Amazing how such subtle connections arise across decades.

Another _slight_ correlation exists between two influential comedies:  &#039;The Producers&#039; was nominated for Best Original Screenplay and Best Supporting Actor (Gene Wilder -- now that is a richly-deserved acting nomination), and &#039;Bridesmaids&#039; is nominated for Best Original Screenplay and Best Supporting Actress (also richly-deserved, I think).  This is not to say, however, that Kristin Wiig will nab the Oscar for writing as Mel Brooks did.

Now what would make things _very_ uncanny is if there is another tie in the best actress category.  Viola Davis and Rooney Mara?  Meryl Streep and Michelle Williams?  No matter which way it would play out (not that it will, I realize), it would be a striking duo of characters .... a fun daydream, at least.

My predictions/two cents for this year, after having read this article (and if anyone cares, ha):

Best Picture:  &#039;The Artist&#039;
Best Director: Martin Scorsese for &#039;Hugo&#039;
Best Actor: Jean Dujardin for &#039;The Artist&#039;
Best Actress:  what the heck, a No Guts, No Glory pick, calling a tie between Viola Davis for &#039;The Help&#039; and Meryl Streep for &#039;The Iron Lady&#039;
Best Supporting Actor:  Christopher Plummer for &#039;Beginners&#039;
Best Supporting Actress:  Octavia Spencer for &#039;The Help&#039; (though how cool it would be if Melissa McCarthy wins here)
Best Original Screenplay:  My heart says &#039;Midnight in Paris,&#039; but my mind says &#039;The Artist,&#039; and I will go with the latter
Best Adapted Screenplay:  &#039;The Descendants&#039;

Thanks again!

--Z</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Sasha, for this rich and interesting piece.  As always, your putting years in dialog is insightful, fascinating, and uncanny.  Amazing how such subtle connections arise across decades.</p>
<p>Another _slight_ correlation exists between two influential comedies:  &#8216;The Producers&#8217; was nominated for Best Original Screenplay and Best Supporting Actor (Gene Wilder &#8212; now that is a richly-deserved acting nomination), and &#8216;Bridesmaids&#8217; is nominated for Best Original Screenplay and Best Supporting Actress (also richly-deserved, I think).  This is not to say, however, that Kristin Wiig will nab the Oscar for writing as Mel Brooks did.</p>
<p>Now what would make things _very_ uncanny is if there is another tie in the best actress category.  Viola Davis and Rooney Mara?  Meryl Streep and Michelle Williams?  No matter which way it would play out (not that it will, I realize), it would be a striking duo of characters &#8230;. a fun daydream, at least.</p>
<p>My predictions/two cents for this year, after having read this article (and if anyone cares, ha):</p>
<p>Best Picture:  &#8216;The Artist&#8217;<br />
Best Director: Martin Scorsese for &#8216;Hugo&#8217;<br />
Best Actor: Jean Dujardin for &#8216;The Artist&#8217;<br />
Best Actress:  what the heck, a No Guts, No Glory pick, calling a tie between Viola Davis for &#8216;The Help&#8217; and Meryl Streep for &#8216;The Iron Lady&#8217;<br />
Best Supporting Actor:  Christopher Plummer for &#8216;Beginners&#8217;<br />
Best Supporting Actress:  Octavia Spencer for &#8216;The Help&#8217; (though how cool it would be if Melissa McCarthy wins here)<br />
Best Original Screenplay:  My heart says &#8216;Midnight in Paris,&#8217; but my mind says &#8216;The Artist,&#8217; and I will go with the latter<br />
Best Adapted Screenplay:  &#8216;The Descendants&#8217;</p>
<p>Thanks again!</p>
<p>&#8211;Z</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oscar Flashback: 1968 &#8211; Oliver, a Globes Musical Comedy Wins Big by Bette</title>
		<link>http://www.awardsdaily.com/2012/02/oscar-flashback-thebigsplit/#comment-608599</link>
		<dc:creator>Bette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.awardsdaily.com/?p=49227#comment-608599</guid>
		<description>Rashad:

I disagree.  Rocky is not nearly as highly regarded as it was back in 1976.  It certainly was a popular sensation and critics liked it, but not nearly as much as Network (arguably the greatest American screenplay, and certainly the most prescient), All the President&#039;s Men, and Taxi Driver.  All three are far more important, influential films than Rocky, both then and now.  Taxi Driver regularly makes best in world cinema polls, it was absolute peak Scorsese (with Raging Bull and Goodfellas; those three alone secure Scorsese&#039;s legacy; The Departed isn&#039;t in the same league).  

I also submit that without their rousing scores, both Rocky and Chariots of Fire would have lost and lost big.  Its a shame that the Academy can&#039;t differentiate between good music and great filmmaking.  Don&#039;t get me wrong, I loved Rocky as a kid, and I enjoyed it again a few years ago, but even as a kid it was apparent that Network &amp; President&#039;s Men were finer pieces of cinema.  The Oscar is supposedly for &quot;BEST&quot; Picture.  Three other films from 1976 blew it away, not to mention foreign greats Seven Beauties, 1900 and Face to Face.  The Oscars are a farce where box office and populist sentiment regularly prevail over art, unless of course it isn&#039;t political correct for that narrow-minded often racist (Do the Right Thing), homophobic (Brokeback), conservative (Reds, High Noon, Citizen Kane) body.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rashad:</p>
<p>I disagree.  Rocky is not nearly as highly regarded as it was back in 1976.  It certainly was a popular sensation and critics liked it, but not nearly as much as Network (arguably the greatest American screenplay, and certainly the most prescient), All the President&#8217;s Men, and Taxi Driver.  All three are far more important, influential films than Rocky, both then and now.  Taxi Driver regularly makes best in world cinema polls, it was absolute peak Scorsese (with Raging Bull and Goodfellas; those three alone secure Scorsese&#8217;s legacy; The Departed isn&#8217;t in the same league).  </p>
<p>I also submit that without their rousing scores, both Rocky and Chariots of Fire would have lost and lost big.  Its a shame that the Academy can&#8217;t differentiate between good music and great filmmaking.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I loved Rocky as a kid, and I enjoyed it again a few years ago, but even as a kid it was apparent that Network &amp; President&#8217;s Men were finer pieces of cinema.  The Oscar is supposedly for &#8220;BEST&#8221; Picture.  Three other films from 1976 blew it away, not to mention foreign greats Seven Beauties, 1900 and Face to Face.  The Oscars are a farce where box office and populist sentiment regularly prevail over art, unless of course it isn&#8217;t political correct for that narrow-minded often racist (Do the Right Thing), homophobic (Brokeback), conservative (Reds, High Noon, Citizen Kane) body.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oscar Flashback: 1968 &#8211; Oliver, a Globes Musical Comedy Wins Big by Bette</title>
		<link>http://www.awardsdaily.com/2012/02/oscar-flashback-thebigsplit/#comment-608582</link>
		<dc:creator>Bette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.awardsdaily.com/?p=49227#comment-608582</guid>
		<description>For goodness sake, Oliver! is a fun movie, but does anybody really think it even deserved to be nominated???  One can easily argue that the nominees should have been the following films that were all highly acclaimed at the time and each of which has stood the test of time more than the Academy&#039;s pics:

2001: A Space Odyssey - clearly the winner, widely regarded as one of the 10 or 20 greatest films of world cinema.  The Directors&#039; branch nominated Kubrick.

Rosemary&#039;s Baby - widely regarded as one of the strongest horror films ever made

Faces - a landmark of the new wave, Cassavettes at his most brilliant

Planet of the Apes - widely regarded as one of the best sci fi films ever made with one of the strongest endings

and either

Petulia - Richard Lester director, Nicholas Roeg cinematographer, Julie Christie, George C. Scott, Joseph Cotten all at their best, brilliant screenplay to boot
 
or 

The Producers - widely regarded as one of the funniest films ever made, won the original screenplay Oscar

Sorry, but none of the nominees, save maybe Funny Girl, are as good.
The Lion in Winter is stagey and not that strong a script, despite a screenplay Oscar (the play wasn&#039;t even nominated for the Tony, nor should it have been (just like that wildly overrated Hepburn film On Golden Pond, all sentiment and shmaltz, &quot;suck-face&quot;, ugh).  Hepburn and O&#039;Toole and Hopkins chewed the scenery and spit it out.  Rachel Rachel is fine, solid filmmaking, beautifully acted, but let&#039;s face it, a bit draggy and boring at times.  Romeo and Juliet looked and sounded beautiful, but the cast, especially the leads, were tepid (blink and you miss Laurence Olivier).  

Funny Girl, however, was a brilliant re-imagining of the stage musical, really opening up the story for film in far more cinematic and imaginative ways than, say, second rate Chicago.  But Oliver! had scope and tradition and Carol Reed going for it.  Reed never won, despite having lost for The Third Man (not even nominated for Best Picture, which even then was shocking, and worse now, after being voted by the British Film Institute as the greatest British film ever made, and in my opinion rightfully so), plus The Fallen Idol, and he wasn&#039;t even nominated for masterpiece Odd Man Out (maybe he should have won for that too, though 1947 was a tricky year, with the likes of Monsieur Verdoux, Out of the Past, Stairway to Heaven (a/k/a A Matter of Life and Death), Black Narcissus, and one worthy nominee, Great Expectations (winner Gentleman&#039;s Agreement was well-meaning but creaks, the finer anti-semitism film the same year was Crossfire).  But I digress.  They probably wanted to finally honor Reed, which likely carried Oliver! to a narrow win over Lion.  But with these other films in the competition, especially towering 2001, its one of their many many embarrassments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For goodness sake, Oliver! is a fun movie, but does anybody really think it even deserved to be nominated???  One can easily argue that the nominees should have been the following films that were all highly acclaimed at the time and each of which has stood the test of time more than the Academy&#8217;s pics:</p>
<p>2001: A Space Odyssey &#8211; clearly the winner, widely regarded as one of the 10 or 20 greatest films of world cinema.  The Directors&#8217; branch nominated Kubrick.</p>
<p>Rosemary&#8217;s Baby &#8211; widely regarded as one of the strongest horror films ever made</p>
<p>Faces &#8211; a landmark of the new wave, Cassavettes at his most brilliant</p>
<p>Planet of the Apes &#8211; widely regarded as one of the best sci fi films ever made with one of the strongest endings</p>
<p>and either</p>
<p>Petulia &#8211; Richard Lester director, Nicholas Roeg cinematographer, Julie Christie, George C. Scott, Joseph Cotten all at their best, brilliant screenplay to boot</p>
<p>or </p>
<p>The Producers &#8211; widely regarded as one of the funniest films ever made, won the original screenplay Oscar</p>
<p>Sorry, but none of the nominees, save maybe Funny Girl, are as good.<br />
The Lion in Winter is stagey and not that strong a script, despite a screenplay Oscar (the play wasn&#8217;t even nominated for the Tony, nor should it have been (just like that wildly overrated Hepburn film On Golden Pond, all sentiment and shmaltz, &#8220;suck-face&#8221;, ugh).  Hepburn and O&#8217;Toole and Hopkins chewed the scenery and spit it out.  Rachel Rachel is fine, solid filmmaking, beautifully acted, but let&#8217;s face it, a bit draggy and boring at times.  Romeo and Juliet looked and sounded beautiful, but the cast, especially the leads, were tepid (blink and you miss Laurence Olivier).  </p>
<p>Funny Girl, however, was a brilliant re-imagining of the stage musical, really opening up the story for film in far more cinematic and imaginative ways than, say, second rate Chicago.  But Oliver! had scope and tradition and Carol Reed going for it.  Reed never won, despite having lost for The Third Man (not even nominated for Best Picture, which even then was shocking, and worse now, after being voted by the British Film Institute as the greatest British film ever made, and in my opinion rightfully so), plus The Fallen Idol, and he wasn&#8217;t even nominated for masterpiece Odd Man Out (maybe he should have won for that too, though 1947 was a tricky year, with the likes of Monsieur Verdoux, Out of the Past, Stairway to Heaven (a/k/a A Matter of Life and Death), Black Narcissus, and one worthy nominee, Great Expectations (winner Gentleman&#8217;s Agreement was well-meaning but creaks, the finer anti-semitism film the same year was Crossfire).  But I digress.  They probably wanted to finally honor Reed, which likely carried Oliver! to a narrow win over Lion.  But with these other films in the competition, especially towering 2001, its one of their many many embarrassments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 6/10 queries in 0.033 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 450/451 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.awardsdaily.com @ 2012-02-04 00:28:30 -->
