Emmys

In advance of Thursday’s 2015 Emmy nomination announcement, the Awards Daily TV crew of Megan, Joey, and Clarence are each providing their predictions in the major Emmy categories. Check back on Thursday to see who wins the Awards Daily TV Emmy prediction crown. Want to play along? Leave your predictions in the Comments section below.

Today, we’re starting with Megan who is predicting a big Emmy hug for Mad Men’s final year.

 

Best Comedy Series

  • The Big Bang Theory
  • Jane The Virgin
  • Last Man on Earth
  • Modern Family
  • Silicon Valley
  • Transparent
  • Veep

 

Best Actor, Comedy

  • Louis C.K., Louie
  • Will Forte, Last Man on Earth
  • William H. Macy, Shameless
  • Thomas Middleditch, Silicon Valley
  • Jim Parsons, The Big Bang Theory
  • Jeffrey Tambor, Transparent

 

Best Actress, Comedy

  • Edie Falco, Nurse Jackie
  • Julia Louis-Dreyfus, Veep
  • Amy Poehler, Parks & Recreation
  • Gina Rodriguez, Jane The Virgin
  • Amy Schumer, Inside Amy Schumer
  • Lily Tomlin, Grace & Frankie

 

Best Supporting Actor, Comedy

  • Andre Braugher, Brooklyn Nine-Nine
  • Ty Burrell, Modern Family
  • Tony Hale, Veep
  • T.J. Miller, Silicon Valley
  • Eric Stonestreet, Modern Family
  • Sam Waterston, Grace & Frankie

 

Best Supporting Actress, Comedy

  • Mayim Bialik, The Big Bang Theory
  • Julie Bowen, Modern Family
  • Gabi Hoffman, Transparent
  • Allison Janney, Mom
  • Judith Light, Transparent
  • Kate McKinnon, Saturday Night Live

 

Best Drama Series

  • Downton Abbey
  • Empire
  • Game of Thrones
  • The Good Wife
  • House of Cards
  • Mad Men
  • Orange Is the New Black

 

Best Actor, Drama

  • Jeff Daniels, The Newsroom
  • Jon Hamm, Mad Men
  • Terrence Howard, Empire
  • Bob Odenkirk, Better Call Saul
  • Kevin Spacey, House of Cards
  • Dominic West, The Affair

 

Best Actress, Drama

  • Claire Danes, Homeland
  • Viola Davis, How to Get Away with Murder
  • Taraji P. Henson, Empire
  • Julianna Margulies, The Good Wife
  • Ruth Wilson, The Affair
  • Robin Wright, House of Cards

 

Best Supporting Actor, Drama

  • Jonathan Banks, Better Call Saul
  • Jim Carter, Downton Abbey
  • Alan Cumming, The Good Wife
  • Ben Mendelsohn, Bloodline
  • Mandy Patinkin, Homeland
  • John Slattery, Mad Men

 

Best Supporting Actress, Drama

  • Uzo Aduba, Orange is the New Black
  • Christine Baranski, The Good Wife
  • Joanne Froggatt, Downton Abbey
  • Christina Hendricks, Mad Men
  • Maggie Smith, Downton Abbey
  • Sissy Spacek, Bloodline

 

Best Limited Series

  • American Crime
  • American Horror Story: Freak Show
  • The Honorable Woman
  • The Missing
  • Olive Kitteridge
  • Wolf Hall

 

Best Movie Made for Television

  • Bessie
  • Derek: The Final Chapter
  • Killing Jesus
  • Nightingale
  • Stockholm, Pennsylvania
  • Worricker: Salting the Battlefield

 

Movie/Mini Actor

  • Adrien Brody, Houdini
  • Ricky Gervais, Derek: The Final Chapter
  • Timothy Hutton, American Crime
  • Richard Jenkins, Olive Kitteridge
  • David Oyelowo, Nightingale
  • Mark Rylance, Wolf Hall

 

Movie/Mini Actress

  • Maggie Gyllenhaal, The Honorable Woman
  • Felicity Huffman, American Crime
  • Jessica Lange, American Horror Story: Freak Show
  • Queen Latifah, Bessie
  • Frances McDormand, Olive Kitteridge
  • Frances O’Connor, The Missing

 

Movie/Mini Supporting Actor

  • Michael Chiklis, American Horror Story: Freak Show
  • Damian Lewis, Wolf Hall
  • Bill Murray, Olive Kitteridge
  • Jonathan Price, Wolf Hall
  • Stephen Rea, The Honorable Woman
  • Michael Kenneth Williams, Bessie

 

Movie/Mini Supporting Actress

  • Kathy Bates, American Horror Story: Freak Show
  • Judy Davis, Worricker: Salting the Battlefield
  • Claire Foy, Wolf Hall
  • Monique, Bessie
  • Janet McTeer, The Honorable Woman
  • Sarah Paulson, American Horror Story: Freak Show

 

Reality Competition Program

  • The Amazing Race
  • Celebrity Game Night
  • Dancing with the Stars
  • Project Runway
  • So You Think You Can Dance
  • The Voice

 

Reality Host

  • Tom Bergeron, Dancing with the Stars
  • Carson Daly, The Voice
  • Cat Deeley, So You Think You Can Dance
  • Phil Keoghan, The Amazing Race
  • Heidi Klum/Tim Gunn, Project Runway
  • Jane Lynch, Celebrity Game Night

 

Variety Talk Series

  • The Colbert Report
  • The Daily Show
  • Jimmy Kimmel Live
  • Last Week Tonight with John Oliver
  • Real Time with Bill Maher
  • Tonight Show with Jimmy Fallon

 

Variety Sketch Series

  • Comedy Bang Bang
  • Drunk History
  • Inside Amy Schumer
  • Key and Peele
  • Portlandia
  • Saturday Night Live

Members of the Television Academy who participated in voting for this year’s Primetime Emmy Awards nominations selected their preferences last week and turned in final ballots before last Friday. While most of the emphasis falls on the series and acting races before nominations are announced, predicting what will be voted into Outstanding Writing in a Drama Series and Outstanding Directing in a Drama Series is more difficult. When voting in these races, Academy members nominate specific episodes on the ballot, unlike in the acting and series races where the work/artist must first accomplish the nomination, then an episode is choose by the panel of judges to evaluate for the win.

Since the episodes being considered are already selected and many shows submitted multiple episodes (shows are ultimately competing against themselves), securing a nomination is a more strenuous task than winning in these categories.

For example, when someone voted for Bryan Cranston in Breaking Bad, they simply marked off Bryan Cranston in Breaking Bad, no episode included. (Cranston, after being nominated, picked an episode to contend for the win.) But for Vince Gilligan to have been nominated in the writing category, a voter had to mark off an episode title, like “Felina,” on the ballot, not “Vince Gilligan.”

Better Call Saul

One of the more fruitful paths of the writing and directing races is for a show to simply present only one knockout episode on the ballot. Doing that eliminates the possibility that Academy members will split votes among various episodes from a single show. This year, Downton Abbey decided on single submissions for each category: “Episode 8” for writing and “Episode 9” for directing. It’s likely the show will conquer slots in both categories (even in the less likely directing group), because Academy members often use a show they personally admire as a filler nominee (we all understand Downton Abbey is an Emmy-voter favorite), and having only one option from that personally admired show with which to fill the ballot increases the show’s odds of being nominated.

Masters of Sex frugally submitted episodes this year as well. The much-acclaimed episode “Fight” was submitted for both writing and directing, and the season two premiere, “Parallax” was subsequently placed on the writing ballot. While their scarcity looks to be profitable, Masters of Sex has an uphill battle to climb with the Academy this year. The topic of sex does not exactly leap off the screen as bait for older voters, and the fact that Masters of Sex was overlooked in most of the major categories last year is very telling of the lack of interest in the show. The second season did not hit any new highs in terms of buzz either, so even with strong submissions, it’s not easy to justify newfound faith in the show after such a noiseless first run at the Emmys.

The Americans chose wisely out of its thirteen superb episodes, picking showcases that emphasize the strengths voters look for in each category: “Stingers” and “Do Mail Robots Dream of Electric Sheep?” for writing, and “Walter Taffet” and “March 8, 1983” for directing. The Americans has been overlooked by the Emmys twice, so the hope for the show seems to be dimming, even after its most celebrated season yet. Boardwalk Empire has been falling off the Emmy radar for the past two years, but the directors’ branch of the Academy is known to have a soft spot for the show. The series’ submissions included “Cuanto,” “Friendless Child” and “Eldorado” for directing, in addition to the less-likely “What Jesus Said,” “King of Norway,” “Devil You Know,” and “Eldorado” in writing. Of its three submissions, Boardwalk Empire’s most promising directing bet is the series finale, “Eldorado.”

Game of Thrones is smarter than most shows with its selections, particularly in the writing category where it usually lists one episode. The season finale “Mother’s Mercy” is the sole option for the writing branch to nominate or snub. With its strong position enshrined in the drama series race, it’s a show most voters will fall back on to fill empty spaces on the ballot when selecting their nominees, which considerably extends the show’s chances here. The Academy members who do watch the show should be able to recall some of the memorable moments from “Mother’s Mercy,” like Cersei’s Walk of Shame and Jon Snow’s shocking death, which will help it get voted in as a finalist. On the directing side, the fan-favorite epic submitted “Unbowed, Unbent, Unbroken,” “Hardhome,” and “Mother’s Mercy.” “Hardhome” looks to be the closest thing one could call a lock in this category due to its buzzing fifteen-minute zombie attack. But “Mother’s Mercy,” as good as the writing is, relies heavily on the directing to give it the impact we felt while watching it. If a show gets double nominations in either of these categories this year, it will most likely be Game of Thrones in directing for “Hardhome” and “Mother’s Mercy.” There are usually one or two shows that get multiple notices in the same category: Breaking Bad got two writing nominations for the past two years; Mad Men got two, sometimes three and four, writing nominations while reigning over Outstanding Drama Series.

GOT

House of Cards received both writing and directing nominations last year, but unlike this year, the same episode was its only submission for both categories. Only having one option increased its chances last year because the show was not competing against itself for a position on the shortlist. This year, Netflix appears more indecisive about its chances for the Outstanding Drama Series frontrunner in these two critical categories, submitting three episodes in writing (“Chapter 32,” “Chapter 35,” “Chapter 39”), and four in directing (“Chapter 28,” “Chapter 35,” “Chapter 37,” “Chapter 39”). Having once won the directing category two years ago and factoring in the heavily directed nature of the show, House of Cards was most likely voted in for a directing nomination last week. But for which episode? “Chapter 37” and “Chapter 39” were among the show’s more significant directing achievements this year, flaunting tricky camera moves and weighty plot developments. I say the spot is between those two while leaning towards the former. On the writing side, the Academy could want to nominate Beau Willimon personally and opt for “Chapter 39,” otherwise the greatest chance for writing (albeit voters are actually watching the episodes) is “Chapter 32,” which is hailed by most binge-watchers as being a series highlight in the writing department. It dared to cover a topical subject matter in gay rights and contained notable moments in the season’s arc.

The Good Wife has an advantage this year over shows that tend to be more popular with the Emmys: it won the Writers Guild Award award for best episodic writing in February. Assuming the WGA holds as much precedent as the other guilds (like SAG, where winners Uzo Aduba, Viola Davis, and Kevin Spacey are all considered locks in their respective categories), The Good Wife looks to be in an optimal position for a nomination in the writing category. And besides having one leg up in having been nominated in this category before, CBS submitted the perfect Emmy-writer-bait episode in “Oppo Research,” penned by Robert and Michelle King, the creators and driving forces behind the critic-favorite series. The Good Wife also has the most mechanically impressive episode of the 2014-15 in the ingenious “Mind’s Eye,” which was on the longlist for directing. Success in a directing nomination is less likely than winning a spot in the writing category, for no other reason than The Good Wife is not as dependent on flashy directing as shows like Game of Thrones and House of Cards. The directing branch may not have been paying as much attention to the series as the writing branch.

house-of-cards-season-3-2

But there’s a problem that faces The Good Wife: it didn’t submit only those killer episodes. In addition to “Oppo Research,” “The Deconstruction” was a second writing submission, and the three episodes placed on the directing ballot were “Mind’s Eye” (directed by Robert King), “Loser Edit” (directed by Brooke Kennedy), and “The Deconstruction” (written and directed by Ted Humphrey). Instead of submitting two straight shots that could have guaranteed nominations, they offered work from each of the series’ longtime contributors, Kennedy and Humphrey, in addition to the showrunners, the Kings. Writing is less of an issue than directing though, because the consensus says “Oppo Research” is the season’s best episode and “The Deconstruction” among the season’s worst.

Like The Good Wife, Homeland won the television honor at the Directors Guild Awards, which should make it a frontrunner in the directing category. Homeland received two nominations in Outstanding Directing in a Drama Series for its first two seasons and won the writing category consecutively. But sadly, this is where superfluous submissions wound strong shows. The team behind Homeland submitted half of their twelve episodes this year, and that’s something that could really hinder its chances. Homeland is not the only show that failed to be circumspect in its Emmy strategy: Orange is the New Black submitted six in writing and four in directing, while Mad Men and Better Call Saul practically offered their entire seasons to the Academy for the first round of voting:

 

Better Call Saul
Writing (6 submissions): Uno, Five-O, Alpine Shepherd Boy, Bingo, Pimento, Marco
Directing (9 submissions): Uno, Mijo, Five-O, Alpine Shepherd Boy, Bingo, Pimento, Nacho, Rico, Marco

Homeland
Writing (6 submissions): The Drone Queen, About a Boy, Redux, Halfway to a Donut, There’s Something Else Going On, 13 Hours in Islamabad
Directing (5 submissions): From A to B and Back Again, Redux, Halfway to a Donut, There’s Something Else Going On, 13 Hours in Islamabad

Mad Men
Writing (6 submissions): New Business, The Forecast, Time & Life, Lost Horizon, The Milk and Honey Route, Person-to-Person
Directing (5 submissions): Severance, The Forecast, Time & Life, Lost Horizon, Person-to-Person

Orange is the New Black
Writing (6 submissions): Thirsty Bird, It Was The Change, You Also Have a Pizza, Low Self Esteem City, 40 Oz. of Furlough, We Have Manners. We’re Polite.
Directing (4 submissions): Thirsty Bird, Low Self Esteem City, 40 Oz. Of Furlough, We Have Manners. We’re Polite.

 

Whenever shows put mass amounts of episodes on the nomination ballot, making it to the next round can become a matter of name recognition of the writer/director, or individual episodes whose buzz universally stands out from of all other available options. So, Better Call Saul’s best bet for a nomination in either category is for the pilot episode, “Uno,” because Emmy King Vince Gilligan, the man responsible for the incumbent drama series winner, directed it. Submitting so many examples really shoots itself in the foot for something like “Five-O,” which has the acclaim to make it in to writing had there been fewer Better Call Saul episodes on the ballot. Orange is the New Black is similar in that it has an episode directed by industry mogul Jodie Foster, “Thirsty Bird.” It’s also a safe bet because Foster was nominated last year for her work on the show. Regrettably for Orange is the New Black, its salty writing could be passed over this year since it’s now in the more competitive drama writing field (not the lighter comedy it was up against last year) and doesn’t have a clear season two masterpiece every voter will be marking down. If a writing nomination does surface, it will likely be “Thirsty Bird,” duplicating its directing hopes, or “We Have Manners. We’re Polite,” a distant possibility.

Homeland does not have the jeweled name recognition of Gilligan or Foster to secure a nomination, but it did have three episodes that reinvigorated the series after season three’s enormous quality drop: “Halfway to a Donut,” “There’s Something Else Going On,” and “13 Hours in Islamabad.” Of those three, I could see voters drawn to “There’s Something Else Going On” for the sheer size and epic feel, but also there’s no denying the seismic audience reaction to “13 Hours in Islamabad.” “From A to B and Back Again,” which was the episode to win DGA, is a strong possibility too. Outstanding Writing in a Drama Series is wide open yet severely competitive this year, and since the writing is not necessarily what drew fans back to Homeland in its fourth season, a writing nomination is a longer shot than its guild-winning directing.

Mad Men was once the toast of the Emmy ceremony, and reflecting the boldness it acquired over the years, AMC put forth 85% of its final season on the ballot. There were some excellent — some of the best ever — episodes in this second half of the final season, but this is a different time we live in compared to when Mad Men was in full power at the Emmys. No show is going to occupy three or four of the five nominees like it used to. Heck, the more-than-worthy “Waterloo” could not even get into the writing category last year for the first half of the seventh season. But, Mad Men has the episode everyone will be eyeing up in its finale “Person-to-Person.” It’s a lock for writing and stands a good chance in directing, if not for anything else but for being “the Mad Men finale.” If another Mad Men episode stretches into writing, it may come down to either the iconic-moment-filled “Lost Horizon,” the fresh “Time & Life,” or the penultimate episode “The Milk and Honey Route.”

12-empire.w529.h352.2x

Lastly are three freshman shows that have Emmy potential: The Affair, Bloodline, and Empire. The big question mark of this pre-nominations phase of the Emmys is whether or not The Affair will stick with voters, because some argue it’s not exactly the Emmy’s taste. But if they fall for it, expect the pilot to be nominated for writing. The Emmys love to nominate pilot episodes and The Affair’s pilot shows the inventive narrative at its most welcoming. Showtime has submitted the pilot for both categories, the heavily emotional ninth episode in both categories, and seventh episode for directing. Bloodline is going to be a hit or miss show with the Emmys. I’m expecting it to have, at best, a modest success with nominations (being merely good doesn’t get you a spot at the table with the big kids anymore), but they chose carefully in the submissions, only submitting “Part 12” for writing and parts 1, 4, and 13 for directing. The freshman show that is the safest to leave its mark on Emmy territory is Empire. The odds of it being nominated in directing for the pilot, which was orchestrated by Oscar-nominee Lee Daniels, are favorable. Outside of the pilot being submitted in writing and directing, Empire also will be competing with “The Lyon’s Roar” and “Dangerous Bonds” in directing, and “False Imposition,” “Die But Once,” “The Lyon’s Roar,” “Unto to Breach” in writing. However, it’s doubtful the show will likely attract the writers’ attention with its soapy tone and execution.

After taking all of the submissions from the Emmy’s top shows into extensive consideration, the following lists are my predictions of the frontrunners and possibilities for the nominations in the writing and directing categories.

 

Outstanding Writing in a Drama Series

  1. Person-to-Person, Mad Men**
  2. Mother’s Mercy, Game of Thrones**
  3. Episode 8, Downton Abbey**
  4. Oppo Research, The Good Wife**
  5. Chapter 32, House of Cards**
  6. Pilot, The Affair
  7. Fight, Masters of Sex
  8. Thirsty Bird, Orange is the New Black
  9. Uno, Better Call Saul
  10. Lost Horizon, Mad Men
  11. The Milk and Honey Route, Mad Men
  12. Chapter 39, House of Cards
  13. Time & Life, Mad Men
  14. Stingers, The Americans
  15. Five-O, Better Call Saul
  16. Halfway to a Donut/There’s Something Else Going On/13 Hours, Homeland
  17. Part 12, Bloodline
  18. We Have Manners. We’re Polite, Orange is the New Black

 

Outstanding Directing in a Drama Series

  1. Hardhome, Game of Thrones**
  2. Uno, Better Call Saul**
  3. Thirsty Bird, Orange is the New Black**
  4. Eldorado, Boardwalk Empire**
  5. Chapter 37, House of Cards**
  6. Pilot, Empire
  7. Person-to-Person, Mad Men
  8. Mother’s Mercy, Game of Thrones
  9. 13 Hours in Islamabad, Homeland
  10. Episode 9, Downton Abbey
  11. Chapter 39, House of Cards
  12. There’s Something Else Going On, Homeland
  13. From A to B and Back Again, Homeland
  14. Mind’s Eye, The Good Wife
  15. Fight, Masters of Sex

The 67th Primetime Emmy Awards nominations will be unveiled July 16.

There are those names on the television that are pretty hard to forget, or shake off, with regards to potential Emmy nominations in the Lead Drama categories. The same can be said for Comedy. And “potential” might not be the right word either. Names like Kevin Spacey, Robin Wright, Julianna Margulies, Jon Hamm, Claire Danes,  are household names now – that might be five slots taken already. Recent juggernauts riding a popularity wave include Viola Davis, Taraji P. Henson, Terrence Howard, Bob Odenkirk, and Kyle Chandler. Is that another five slots filled?

If that is the case, though nothing is set in stone, then with six slots apiece for Drama Actor and Actress, only one more from each can make the nominations list. Are we saying that Ruth Wilson, Elisabeth Moss, and Taylor Schilling can not all possibly be nominated? That Jeff Daniels, Clive Owen, and Dominic West will not share the list in the Actor category?

Go to that corner of your mind, you know the place, it is where you are given the freedom to think “but what if…”. That tiny chance, a window of opportunity, that choices might not go exactly the way we expected. That a Vera Farmiga or a James Spader could sneak into the mix at the last minute. Emmys breed familiar more often than not though, even with the winners. So you may have to dig really deep for that rabbit’s foot or horse shoe. You don’t have to go far though for alternatives to the so-called obvious.

They love the British over in the States don’t they (fans of Keri Russell and Matthew Rhys will be hoping they like The Americans too)? I mean, BAFTA winner Olivia Colman would likely make my own personal ballot – Michelle Dockery though, would not. I have also seen Hugh Bonneville’s name a couple of times, but as good as Downton Abbey has been I just don’t think it can keep up here. “Has been” may be the appropriate phrasing there. Will Emmy follow suit? Even fellow Brits Michael Sheen and Andrew Lincoln have little chance at all as I see it.

Step up to the plate then, Gillian Anderson (raised in England) and Jamie Dornan (actually from Northern Ireland) from The Fall. We all know both of those names for very different reasons. Due to the show’s success simmering rather than bubbling over the surface, their names are not so much synonymous with this gritty detective drama. The Fall is close to excellent, one of the very best series I have personally seen in the last twelve months. It’s gripping narrative is lean and to the point, and throws punches without warning. Had it not been for the barrage of quality drama this year, then who knows, maybe The Fall could have peered it’s head further from the ground.

Gillian Anderson’s Superintendent Stella Gibson is a rough-around-the edges but magnetic woman. A good woman, who tries hard to hide her own personal insecurities by projecting herself as a no-nonsense police detective. A damn good detective. Anderson does vulnerable and ruthless extremely well, and knows exactly when to glide between the two here. As well as lugging around her various emotional baggage, she allows her face to do a lot of the work. There are countless examples of this, but one I have touched upon before is when her watery eyes tell us that she is completely focused on her work and the people at risk, but also that she has a heart and is deeply moved by the circumstances of a potential victim. Emmy know Anderson well from her skeptical-of-aliens days, and with The Fall, some twenty years later, her acting and presence on the screen have also clearly, and mercifully, matured.

Jamie Dornan is Paul Spector, the mouse to Gibson’s cat, and a seemingly remorseless tormentor and killer of women. A far cry from that performance he made thousands sit through in Fifty Shades of Gray. I am still not sure if the undeniable contrast between these two very recent roles is a hindrance or a light-shiner. Dornan in The Fall is simply extraordinary, and I mean that as a big fat compliment. You are never going to admire a character like this, who does these awful things, and with method. Even with his role as a husband and father to contend with as an audience member. But you remain glued to this twisted murderer. Dornan makes your stomach curdle at times, but you can’t take your eyes off him (sure, he is handsome I suppose, but that’s not what I meant). Spector is a casual character, his body language and engagements with others would suggest he has no guilt whatsoever for what he has done. Even when in danger of being gunned down by thugs, caught by the police, or sussed out by his family, he remains eerily calm.

Gillian Anderson and Jamie Dornan, then, are two names that should have been in the midst of much more conversations than they have been – and because of The Fall. Two compelling, strong, yet very opposing performances, from terrific actors doing some of their very best work. I will keep my fingers crossed for two such outsiders come Emmy nomination time, likely in the same vain I did for Jenny Slate and Tom Hardy prior to the Oscar nominations.

Oh well, the underdog game is one I enjoy playing.

 Kudos to the PR team behind Jane the Virgin. No idea if it will work, but it’s definitely buzz-worthy. 

 

Last month’s Critics’ Choice TV awards mixed things up with some predictable entries alongside some left-field nominees that feel dramatically (pun intended) unlikely to represent when the Emmys have their say come nomination day in mid-July. Exactly three nominees – category winner Jonathan Banks (Better Call Saul), Mandy Patinkin (Homeland), and (to a lesser extent) Ben Mendelsohn (Bloodline) – seem pretty safe to repeat. Christopher Eccleston (The Leftovers), Craig T. Nelson (Parenthood), and Walton Goggins (Justified) feel like they’re card-carrying members of the “Critics’ Choice Push Club” – those actors deemed most in danger of being forgotten by an awards voting body who wants to use their conveniently placed awards announcement to maximum influence on the Emmys.

So, if my assumptions are correct, then who fits into the remaining three slots? Much like the Drama Actress category, the Supporting Actor in a Drama Series category has something of an abundance of riches, and the Emmys could go in any number of ways.

The most obvious, perennial nominee missing from the Critics’ Choice list is Peter Dinklage (Game of Thrones), a former winner in the category. Like Season Five itself, Dinklage’s character arc through the season has been received with mixed opinions. After ***spoiler?*** killing his father at the end of Season Four, Tyrion Lannister (Dinklage) fled Westeros thanks to the assistance of Varys, the puppet master eunuch pulling the strings behind much of the action in the first four seasons. Since then, he’s spent his time in a crate, in a box, in a brothel, in a sack, on a boat, in a slave trade operation, and finally in the company of the Mother of Dragons, Daenerys. Through it, Dinklage has delivered his lines with the assured, dry wit that’s served him so well in the series thus far. He’s also has several high-profile dramatic sequences recently with Daenerys where he’s had to use his raw intelligence to curry favor with her and save his own life. Say what you will about Season Five, but I suspect Dinklage will emerge unscathed by any perceived disappointments.

Next in line would be Jon Voight (Ray Donovan), not a show I watch but a buzzy performance nonetheless. In fact, most of the awards juice around the show comes through his performance, which has already netted him a Golden Globe. He’s been nominated here before, and I see no reason he won’t be again.

With the final season of Mad Men put to bed, all that remains is handing out the final nominations and awards (if any). Leading up the pack for Mad Men has to be John Slattery for his farewell performance as Roger Sterling. It’s hard to imagine that, after seven seasons of the series, he has never won an award for the performance. Of the men on the show, he’s certainly the one to engender the post buzz and uniform good will with audiences more accepting of his boozy good humor than of Jon Hamm’s tormented, series-spanning identity crisis. Still, this too is a risky proposition considering he hasn’t been nominated since 2011, but I’m willing to go with it given the massive media push for the series finale.

So that gives us the following actors in lead positions:

  • Jonathan Banks, Better Call Saul
  • Peter Dinklage, Game of Thrones
  • Ben Mendelsohn, Bloodline
  • Mandy Patinkin, Homeland
  • John Slattery, Mad Men
  • Jon Voight, Ray Donovan

If someone has to go, then it’s most likely going to be Slattery, honestly, because Mad Men is really such a wild card when it comes to recognizing the actors. It’s impossible to gauge the final season appeal of a show that, while it is frequently nominated in the Drama Series category, has a very hard time winning for its actors. He’s the weakest of the six. Feel free to tell me I’m wrong. Banks will be there. I’m certain of that. So will Patinkin for his stunning acting in Homeland Season Four where his character is kidnapped and terrorized, at one point causing him to beg for his own death. It was a memorable arc for the actor, and he will be there as well with a strong chance to win. Dinklage will most likely be the sole acting nominee for Game of Thrones this year. I will also defend Mendelsohn’s inclusion here because, of all the high octane cast in Netflix’s Bloodline, he’s the one you remember, drawing from Robert DeNiro’s more subtle moments (if there were any) in Martin Scorsese’s Cape Fear. I can easily see Mendelsohn and Sissy Spacek both recognized for the series as they share many tender moments of (dubious) reconnection toward the end of the series.

So, if Slattery falls out, then who takes his place? That’s a trickier question as there are literally a dozen actors would could fill the slot including Norbert Leo Butz (Bloodline), Alan Cumming (The Good Wife), Jim Carter or Brendan Coyle (Downton Abbey), Michael McKeen (Better Call Saul), Michael Kelly (House of Cards), Matt Czuchry (The Good Wife), Sam Elliot (Justified), Joe Morton (Scandal), Joshua Jackson (The Affair), and the Critics’ Choice-mentioned Christopher Eccleston (The Leftovers), Craig T. Nelson (Parenthood), and Walton Goggins (Justified).

Cumming seems best poised to bump Slattery because his recent performance in The Good Wife has been very well received, potentially putting him back into contention for the first time since 2011. And you can never officially count out anyone from Downton Abbey. If I’m being honest, then I’d like to see Timothy Dalton considered for his wonderfully loony work in Showtime’s Penny Dreadful. He is campaigning in the Best Actor category, but that’s a mistake. Eva Green owns the show, and the rest are all supporting players. At any rate, category confusion aside, make no mistake that he isn’t getting anywhere near the nominee’s circle, but it takes a certain kind of actor to act in such outlandish scenarios and give them credibility.

Just because it’s pulpy fiction doesn’t mean it’s not great.

Remember Christine Cagney and Mary Beth Lacey?

Rhetorical question to emphasize solid, prominent women on television. I mean, between them they won about thirty Emmys in the ’80s. Then there was Dana Scully, the level-headed, grounded FBI special agent with a scientific brain. Emmy liked her too (more than her male partner). Good actresses win Emmys, sure, but I see strong women winning Emmys. They liked that Manhattan police detective Olivia Benson. And that super-smart fact-finder from the Los Angeles police Brenda Leigh Johnson. They were also a fan of that psychic lady Allison DuBois. And that mafia boss Tony’s wife Carmela. Women and performances of influence and awe.

What about Sarah Manning from Orphan Black then? She is an underdog, she is gritty and determined. She is street-wise and smart – even in the midst of ultimate danger. Doesn’t she fit the bill? She goes head-first through all manner of obstacles you or I could hardly imagine, but you buy into it. Sarah is a female protagonist with grit between her teeth. In fact she crunches it up and spits it out. Sure, she had a tough upbringing, raised by her foster mother with her little brother Felix. Sarah also has a little girl. That’s right, she is a mother too. A single mother. She has neglected her daughter somewhat, due to circumstances perhaps out of her control, but by God is she ruthlessly firing on all cylinders to make up for that now. Her character is not over-the-top, it is just that she runs faster than our eyes can see. She has too.

Some of those character traits run right through those other leading ladies in Orphan Black. Have a look at the enigmatic Cosima Niehaus. She brings sexy back to science and nerdville. She is a hell of a lot more than that though. Cosima wears her freshly broken heart on her sleeve while still working with the very woman she loves – neither able to completely trust her or be with her. Ouch. That pain shows, all the while hanging tight, trying desperately to brush over the day-to-day severity of her own could-be-fatal biological illness. Hang in there Cosima.

Consider Alison Hendrix too, Orphan Black‘s most humorous and subtle acting brilliance. A model-family woman who lives in the suburbs, organised and highly-maintained, her life is anything but ideal or simple any more. Hey, her own husband was her monitor. And after letting her “best” friend die, she heads for rehab herself. Whether it is mending her marriage, conducting narcotics deals, or burying a dead body correctly, Alison remains conservative and longs for order – even as the falling dominoes start to scatter chaotically out of line. Vote Alison.

And how can you possibly ignore the illustrious Helena? A ferocious, fearless, bushy-haired cuckoo. I am, of course, being too harsh, she may be the sanest one of all. You are at first made to believe she is the enemy, and then grow to admire her. You have no choice in that. For the record, Helena is the character in Orphan Black I love the most. Her up-bringing was also a sheltered one – she appears to be a prisoner whether locked inside a cell / box / bunker or not. As an adult now she is a spontaneous, vengeful woman, she would beat up and slice up anyone who would even mention hurting those she loves. And so she does. But her heart is in the right place, truly.

The most amazing and compelling aspect of Orphan Black (as if you did not know by now) is that all of those incredible characters, and a few others, are portrayed by the majestic Tatiana Maslany. That fact alone warrants strong recognition and admiration. The potent and virtuoso way Maslany executes these roles, in all their variations and mimicking of one another, is a feat of astonishing bravura. After three seasons, my relentless marvel and opinion has not altered. Not for one single episode, a scene, or moment. And I know I am not the only one. The performances in bringing Helena, Alison, Cosima, and Sarah to the screen are all worthy Supporting Actress contenders in their own right. This is one actress, though, doing work like nobody else. Anywhere. An accomplished actress proving herself worthy of the mantel “Best” over and over.

Bravo Tatiana Maslany, Emmy should have been considering you long before I wrote this.

I’d always enjoyed Lisa Kudrow’s performance on Friends as the looney and lovable Phoebe Buffay. A show widely praised for its comedic ensemble, Friends benefitted from Kudrow’s off-kilter aura and infectious charm. She didn’t have to carry the show, so she could basically effortlessly float in her own orbit around the rest of the more studied cast.

It wasn’t until HBO’s first season of The Comeback way back in 2005 when I realized that Kudrow was indeed a brilliant comedic actress and was capable of far greater things than the confines of Phoebe Buffay. Entering into The Comeback in a close partnership with Michael Patrick King, Kudrow created the incredible character of Valerie Cherish, a former minor sitcom star who was clawing her way back to relevance on a mediocre show. All of this was captured in a mockumentary style perfected by Christopher Guest, The Office, and Parks and Recreation. Kudrow’s performance was immediately slapped with the “brave” label because she willingly put a face to the television industry’s penchant for chewing up actresses and spitting them out. Always overlooked for the younger, hotter cast members, Valerie’s optimism and lust for complete control over her own image made for a fascinating and often hilarious case study. Emmy noticed and improbably rewarded Kudrow with a nomination for Best Actress in a Comedy Series. She lost, though, to Julia Louis-Dreyfus.

But all of that seems but a preamble to Kudrow’s blisteringly amazing comic work in The Comeback Season Two. Emmy should again pay attention. We’ll talk nomination for now, but I’m thinking long term. Lisa Kudrow should win.

The second season premiere kicked things off in much the same vein as before, and I grew a little restless with the direction. Were they really going to rehash everything we’d seen before about the character? She’s still controlling her public persona. She’s still trying to claw her way back to relevance – this time by promoting herself on a Bravo-based Real Housewives show. As the pilot closed, however, Kudrow and the series made an important and vital left-turn for the character of Valerie Cherish. Using her at-home camera crew (consisting of an untrained nephew), she barges into HBO’s offices to protest the filming of an HBO series based on the making of the show detailed in Season One. Valerie Cherish would never allow a word to be written about her that she didn’t rewrite herself.

I knew the series was going to a different, darker place when Valerie is partially conned with a repulsed yet flattered air into reading for the role based on her on-and-off-screen antics. Kudrow’s delivery in the scene is comic perfection as she performs a cold reading of what appears to be an insulting and damaging portrait of an aging actress. Any self-respecting person would turn away from the experience, but Cherish could not. It’s the beauty of the series and Kudrow’s genesis of the Valerie Cherish character that she willingly puts herself into these insulting and degrading situations. Cherish, something of a prude, is forced to spout vulgar language, and Kudrow’s performance of the scene is at once hilarious, haunting, grating, and wildly uncomfortable.

It’s exactly what she intended it to be. And it set the stage for what turned out to be Kudrow’s crowning achievement as an actress, culminating in a perfect season finale.

The season finale, “Valerie Gets What She Really Wants,” gives Kudrow multiple comic beats to hit, and she nails them every time. Valerie has received an Emmy nomination in the show, and she’s basking in the glory she has so persistently craved. She’s basking alone, though, as her husband Mark has abandoned her, weary of her constant need to be on-camera. Her confidant and hairdresser Mickey (the great Robert Michael Morris) is suffering silently from cancer (well, silently to Cherish as she refuses to acknowledge his mortality). As she attends a pre-Emmy party, she bumps into an old friend Chris (Kellan Lutz) who we later discover has an eternal burning flame for her. Kudrows first great moment of the episode is her polite, tempted, but firm rejection of Lutz’s advances. His many, many persistent advances.

Later, prepping for the Emmy ceremony, Cherish is further stressed by Mickey’s failing health. After sending him home in her limo with a bleeding nose, she is faced with exploding sewage pipes, resulting in a garage full of what her Hispanic housekeeper calls “caca.” On paper, it feels like a standard sitcom gag, but they somehow never play it that way. The comedy is real and intense. Life literally hands Kudrow’s Cherish a garage full of shit, and yet she pushes forward.

Merely replaying the notes of Valerie Cherish doesn’t make Kudrow’s Season Two performance a work of art. It’s the fact that she changes. She evolves. Kudrow’s Cherish has always put her career in front of everything else, and her personal life, in return, falls apart. Gradually, Kudrow reveals the cracks in the facade through the season just as quickly as she cements them. The season culminates in Kudrow’s finest screen work to date. Torn between a potentially dying Mickey and being seen on-camera (and potentially winning) at the Emmys, Cherish decides to put her career on the back-burner for once in her life and run to Mickey in his moment of need. The agony and torment on Kudrow’s face as she comes to the conclusion of what she must do and what she has to give up in exchange is amazing and heartfelt. I argue that few comic actresses could have handled the transition so deftly, so subtly, as Kudrow managed.

Kudrow’s Season Two work as Valerie Cherish is a tricky performance from start to finish. She acknowledges the ugly truth about Hollywood, about men and women, and (most tellingly) about actresses themselves. Her transformation from reality star to human is stunningly realized as the final scenes of the season transition from hand-held camera to more traditional filmmaking. Valerie Cherish grew as a human being over the course of the season, and Lisa Kudrow grew as an actress as a result.

Lisa Kudrow has also evolved: from Good to Great. And Emmy has to recognize this remarkable transformation.

Is this going to be the year that ABC’s awards juggernaut loses Best Comedy Series? In case you live under a rock, Modern Family has won the last 5 consecutive years (the only other show to pull this off is Frasier from 94-98). If it wins again this year, it will be the most honored comedy in Emmy history. What other shows are cracking their knuckles to take it down?

The question of whether the Dunphys and Pritchetts will be nominated again is a no brainer. The Family clan will be back to defend their title (whether they win or not is very much up for debate), but are they one of the very few major network comedies that will get in? It seems that the majority of the Family opponents come from HBO and other carriers. At this point in the game, we have to look at shows that might be able to win the category, but I’m not sure what is making a big enough impact to do so.

Modern

The Big Bang Theory has been a recurring show for the last four year in this category, but the show has yet to win. Even though it remains the top-rated comedy in America, it’s not entirely impossible for it to fall out this year. It does feel like the kind of comedy that would win in its final year, and maybe the Emmys are content with giving star Jim Parsons the trophy year after year. While Big Bang is around, Mom (the other Chuck Lorre show) doesn’t seem like it will ever get a nomination—no matter how many surprise Critics’ Choice Television Award nominations it receives.

Parks & Recreation feels like a distant memory for me (I admit that I am someone who hasn’t watched it yet), so will a nomination be too difficult to pull out? It seems that fans would be more satisfied if star Amy Poehler finally walked away with an Emmy and that getting in for Comedy Series is an afterthought. Those fans are D-E-V-O-U-T, though. Never say never. Of the other major networks, the only candidates are freshman sitcoms. Like Modern Family, Fresh Off the Boat plays with the familial dynamic, but are enough people watching the show and loving it? Most of the preliminary awards attention has been going towards the star-making turn from Constance Wu and rightfully so. I’ve said it many times that she is the best thing about Fresh, so I don’t think the show will stand a chance in this year’s race. It has the opportunity to become a beloved show later, but it doesn’t seem to have made a lasting impression.

blackish

The other “family” show that debuted this year is ABC’s Black-ish, and it deserves to be in the race. It’s smart and better than a lot of other comedies out there right now, but it feels as if no one has been talking about it. It hasn’t managed a Critics’ Choice or TCA nomination, and both stars Anthony Anderson and Tracee Ellis Ross are mysteriously absent when it comes to nomination time so far this year. If Modern Family gets a nomination, Black-ish deserves to be there right alongside it. Speaking of shows that no one is talking about, Fox’s Last Man on Earth seemed like a big topic of conversation when it debuted in back in March (Megan is definitely a fan), but good reviews haven’t propelled it anywhere near the awards stratosphere.

On the cable networks, Veep is almost guaranteed to return to the Comedy Series race. The third season was the best received so far, and it (along with star Julia Louis-Dreyfus) should be rather joyous on nomination morning. HBO has another surging comedy in Silicon Valley. It was nominated last year in this category (to a lot of scratching heads), and it just won the Critics’ Choice. Remember: Critics’ Choice does not translate to Emmy glory. It’s simply the only awards body that has announced winners so far this year, and Family wasn’t even nominated at that ceremony. But the question lingers: could this show be the one to steal the crown from the Dunphys and Pritchetts? I bet a lot of Veep fans would be pissed if Silicon snatched the title away from them. The show on HBO that might fall out is Lena Dunham’s Girls. It managed nominations for the first two seasons, but missed out last year. Is it done? I think so.

Veep

The freshman contenders come from different networks. Even though Orange is the New Black got relegated to Drama Series this year (a better place for it this year since the dark tone of the second season looms like a dark cloud), Netflix has two female-driven hopefuls. Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt recalls the Emmy-beloved 30 Rock era with its zany tone and Tina Fey rhythms. The show really gets into its groove around 3 or four episodes in, presumably the time when NBC dropped it and Netflix picked it up. Fans love the show, but, as we all know, fandom doesn’t always translate to nominations. The other is the delightful Grace and Frankie. Like Unbreakable, it took a few episodes to get into its own headspace, but it settles around episode 5. Some people might object to the alternating tone of the show (does it want to be a touching drama-comedy or character-driven comedy?), but the lead actresses make it so thoroughly enjoyable that you only want to spend more time with them. Of the two, I think Unbreakable has a better shot at getting into this major race, but voters might respond to the more traditional sitcom style of Grace and Frankie.

Grace and Frankie

Over at FX, The Comedians is the new show on the block. The show stars Billy Crystal and Josh Gad, and it’s received mixed reviews from critics. Can the love of Crystal propel the show to the Comedy Series? Nah, Louie is going to take that spot! The Louis CK series has been nominated for the last two years, and he will more than likely be nominated in the writing and acting categories. Consider that slot taken.

Jane the Virgin’s huge breakout this entire year means it has a shot at being nominated. Can The CW finally break into the Emmy game? Will it just be for Gina Rodriguez’s huge starring turn? I don’t think you can count it out, but it might just be right under the top 6 slots. It might be resting at number  8 or 9. It would certainly be a nice surprise when the nominations come out if this small show breaks into the big race. The other comedy that you might not be able to deny is Inside Amy Schumer. I am holding onto my prediction that she will be nominated in Leading Actress, and, like Louie CK, she will probably be nominated in the writing category. She’s a huge fan favorite, and she might be getting too big to ignore.

The freshman comedy that has the most assured chance at a nomination is Amazon’s Transparent. Amid the outcries that this belongs in the Drama Series category, the show has earned raves everywhere it goes. Jeffrey Tambor is the favorite in the Comedy Actor category, but, and most importantly, it’s a touching show that allows its characters walk a very fine line between comedy and drama. The comedy can hurt, and you laugh sometimes because you have too in the most dramatic moments. It has a real chance to dethrone Modern Family.

So who gets in?

Predictions:
The Big Bang Theory
Louie
Modern Family
Silicon Valley
Transparent
Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt
Veep

Right Behind Them:
Grace and Frankie
Inside Amy Schumer
Jane the Virgin
Parks & Recreation

Other Possibilities:
Black-ish
The Comedians
Girls

Last Man on Earth

Silicon

It doesn’t feel like I should be talking about The Affair again.

Not after writing about it weekly here on Awards Daily TV. Not after going on and on about it on Awards Daily TV’s Water Cooler podcast. Not after I’ve taken every opportunity I could to sing its praises to anything and anyone who would listen for half a second. Even looking at the title and author of this article, I’m sure there’s someone, somewhere sighing in exasperation. Here he goes. Again.

But I didn’t think I’d have to be pushing for Showtime’s freshman drama. Not after its successful run last fall with critics and audiences alike. Not after its surprise win for both its accomplished lead actress Ruth Wilson and for the series itself. How could a show that beat Game of Thrones or House of Cards need a helping hand into the Emmy Drama Series race? Yet, it was snubbed at the SAG Awards and again, recently, at the Critics’ Choice TV Awards as well as with the Television Critics Association. Suddenly, improbably, its Emmy futures seem bleak.

So here I go again in what will be my last words on Season One. Hope they count.

Showtime’s The Affair is, like life itself, a complex story. On the surface at its most simple, it’s about a middle-aged married man who cheats on his wife with a younger woman. There’s also the gimmick of each episode split into two parts – his and hers competing versions of the affair – and a murder mystery in which both parties are somehow entangled. But, honestly, it’s themes flow so much deeper, so much richer, than its surface would have you believe. Being a long-time married man with children of his own, I don’t have to have personally lived the experiences documented within the show to know that it speaks volumes of truths.

The Affair is a story about family, and the constant, thankless struggle it is to be a parent. It’s about the unspoken disappointments in living ordinary lives. It’s about the loss of loved ones that come and go as you live that life. It’s about letting go and learning to live for yourself in the shadow of grief. Ultimately, it’s about taking a chance at new happiness, succumbing to your desires, by realizing that life is very short – death is all around you – and true happiness is elusive. That theme of justified selfishness is, I believe, The Affair’s boldest stroke, an unwritten truth behind which it stands firmly.

Stars Dominic West and Ruth Wilson burn with chemistry, and their scenes together are intensely physical and deeply felt. West’s role as Noah is more consistently defined as it is that of the man who largely dominates the story and the relationship. It may be unpopular, but, despite the season’s perspectives that are split between the West and Wilson characters, it’s mostly his persistence and domineering air that drives the titular affair forward. That doesn’t mean Wilson’s Alison is a passive participant. In her variation of the story, she struggles with monumental losses that nearly crush her. The earlier death of her child. The later death of her grandmother. The death of her marriage. Struggling against such impossible events, she takes her life into her own and makes her own choices, ultimately to run into the arms of the married man she loves. It isn’t a popular story, but it feels true. That daringness to explore the unpleasant truths of live is the central core of what makes this show great.

The Affair is a beautiful show, one that basks in the summer glow of its Montauk setting. The cinematography catches sunlight dancing on the waves, and you’re lost in the glow as much as any of the characters – particularly the shattered Alison. The writing and direction of the series are both of high calibre as well with celebrated television director Carl Franklin lending his deft hand to two of the ten episodes. Series show runner Sarah Treem maintains her original thoughts through the entire series, allowing the characters’ relationships develop the dramatic action. Finally, the acting across the board is fantastic with leads Ruth Wilson and Dominic West turning in career-best performances and supporting players Maura Tierney and (most surprisingly) Joshua Jackson making mountains out of what could have been stereotypical roles.

This is a show that steamrolled me. It is something of an old-fashioned story (the illicit affair of a rich man and poor woman) mixed with modern twists (the dual, conflicting perspectives), but it consistently drew me in week after week. Audiences reacted in kind as the ratings doubled by season’s end. It is a show that demands patience, that demands you gradually unfold its beauty. The Affair, in this man’s opinion, is the best drama that aired this Emmy season. It is a series that the Academy needs to recognize as it tells stories and provides perspectives we don’t often see on television.

It is, ultimately, an unconventional and daring series. But only if you choose to look close enough to see it.

Ed O’Neill seems like the kind of guy that my dad would like to hang out with. A sort of grizzled, respected national treasure, Mr. O’Neill has been quite the presence on television his entire career. His career has been bookended by two very different roles with a lot of guest actor work in between. Most shocking of all, the man has never won an Emmy, and that needs to change.

The tide seems to be slightly turning against Modern Family. People are waiting for it to fail at the Emmy Awards (imagine those snarky headlines when/if that happens), but it’s still a strong comedy. I suspect that people are tired of seeing it take the stage year after year at awards show after awards show—not unlike the kid in algebra who always does well, is a suck up, and it totally likable.

While many of its stars have been nominated over the years, O’Neill is the one actor who constantly is overlooked when the envelope is opened. Julie Bowen and Eric Stonestreet have both won while Ty Burrell is an Emmy darling. O’Neill has been nominated 3 consecutive times (from 2011-2013), but he missed out last year. Is his nomination luck completely gone?

When O’Neill starred on Married…with Children, he connected with audiences because he was a beleaguered, weary man who just wanted to get ahead with what he had. The show had a cult following, but it was probably too low-bow and trashy for anyone to take any serious awards notice. God forbid we have some great fun with our television. His Jay Pritchett has the same kind of tired and sly wit. He’s a cuddly curmudgeon in a crushed velour track suit who wants his beer cold and his television loud. He’s basically the best version of your grandfather that you’d ever want. Jay might be prickly and spiky on the outside, but his center is soft and gelatinous.

One of the best elements of Modern Family has been the dynamic between Jay and Cam, his son’s husband. Jay has never been fully comfortable with his son’s sexuality and Eric Stonestreet always manages to push the limits of Jay’s comfort zone. In this season’s episode “Knocking ‘Em Down,” Cam tricks Jay into participating in a gay bowling league. Since Jay is a strong bowler (another reason why my dad would enjoy the company of Mr. O’Neill), Cam doesn’t tell him that he has to pretend to be gay in order to play until Jay arrives willing to bowl. Cam’s nemesis (played by Oliver Platt) doesn’t buy Jay’s charade for one second, and Cam tells him to flounce it up. Jay’s reaction: “Why doesn’t he believe I’m gay? I’m not handsome enough—is that it?!”

Normally, I am not a fan of “career awards.” It should always be based on the work that is presented. Either way, O’Neill has always been a strong contender, but I’m sure there are Modern Family haters out there that would disagree with me. Why shouldn’t we award a character like Jay? He’s a man who has worked hard his entire life, and now he is expected to change his viewpoints on everything in a world that is rapidly changing around him. With a lesser man, they would be more stubborn and not adapt. O’Neill’s Jay might be resistant to some change (who isn’t?), but he is a character that always realizes that his change of opinion is for the better. He is a family man who values family above all else. He loves his crazy kids unconditionally and his sometimes crazier wife and stepson.

The notion that O’Neill hasn’t won an Emmy is absurd. Give it to him—not because he has been in the industry for so long. Because he has been in the industry for so long and delivers strong, subtle, hilarious work.

Sign In

Reset Your Password

Email Newsletter