• About Us
  • Sasha Stone
  • Editor Ryan Adams
  • Clarence Moye
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Awardsdaily - The Oscars, the Films and everything in between.
  • Home
  • Oscar Ballot download
  • Good As Gold
  • AD TV
  • Podcasts
  • Interviews
  • All News
  • Home
  • Oscar Ballot download
  • Good As Gold
  • AD TV
  • Podcasts
  • Interviews
  • All News
No Result
View All Result
Awardsdaily - The Oscars, the Films and everything in between.
No Result
View All Result

Paul Haggis rips Scientology, and ditches the ‘church’

by Ryan Adams
October 26, 2009
in AWARDS CHATTER
93


(ABC News, October 24, 2009. The good part starts at 2:45 and really gets fun a minute later.)

At movieline this morning, a brave and scathing letter from Oscar-winner Paul Haggis to Scientology’s national spokesman, Tommy Davis (who you can meet in the clip above). Haggis denounces the controversial ‘church’ for “gay bashing” and other civil rights violations, including smear campaigns against ex-members using private information obtained during Scientology’s mandatory confessional “auditing.” New York Magazine sums up Haggis’ concerns:

It all started when a San Diego church publicly supported Prop 8. Haggis asked Davis to denounce its actions but Davis never went through with it. Then the already-pissed Haggis read an interview in which Davis denied Scientology’s practice of “disconnection” (forcing members to cut off communication with loved ones who oppose Scientology). But Haggis knew disconnection first-hand. His wife was forced to cut ties with her parents. The last straw came when Haggis read about the smear tactics Scientology used against its former members. That’s when he knew it was time to go.

Excerpts from the Haggis letter, which was first published in its entirety on the blog of an ex-Scientologist:

As you know, for ten months now I have been writing to ask you to make a public statement denouncing the actions of the Church of Scientology of San Diego. […] I called and wrote and implored you, as the official spokesman of the church, to condemn their actions. I told you I could not, in good conscience, be a member of an organization where gay-bashing was tolerated.

In that first conversation, back at the end of October of last year, you told me you were horrified, that you would get to the bottom of it and “heads would roll.” You promised action. Ten months passed. No action was forthcoming. The best you offered was a weak and carefully worded press release, which praised the church’s human rights record and took no responsibility. Even that, you decided not to publish.

The church’s refusal to denounce the actions of these bigots, hypocrites and homophobes is cowardly. I can think of no other word. Silence is consent, Tommy. I refuse to consent.

Another excerpt detailing the “disconnection” demanded by Scientology by his wife from her own parents, after the cut.

This was my state of mind when I was online doing research and chanced upon an interview clip with you on CNN. The interview lasted maybe ten minutes – it was just you and the newscaster. And in it I saw you deny the church’s policy of disconnection. You said straight-out there was no such policy, that it did not exist.

I was shocked. We all know this policy exists. I didn’t have to search for verification – I didn’t have to look any further than my own home.

You might recall that my wife was ordered to disconnect from her parents because of something absolutely trivial they supposedly did twenty-five years ago when they resigned from the church. This is a lovely retired couple, never said a negative word about Scientology to me or anyone else I know – hardly raving maniacs or enemies of the church. In fact it was they who introduced my wife to Scientology.

Although it caused her terrible personal pain, my wife broke off all contact with them. I refused to do so. I’ve never been good at following orders, especially when I find them morally reprehensible.

For a year and a half, despite her protestations, my wife did not speak to her parents and they had limited access to their grandchild. It was a terrible time.

That’s not ancient history, Tommy. It was a year ago.

And you could laugh at the question as if it was a joke? You could publicly state that it doesn’t exist?

To see you lie so easily, I am afraid I had to ask myself: what else are you lying about?

And the final objections Haggis raises to Scientology’s repulsive record of revealing intimate details about lapsed members to discredit them in the press:

How dare you use private information in order to label someone an “adulteress?” You took Amy Scobee’s most intimate admissions about her sexual life and passed them onto the press and then smeared them all over the pages your newsletter! I do not know the woman, but no matter what she said or did, this is the woman who joined the Sea Org at 16! She ran the entire celebrity center network, and was a loyal senior executive of the church for what, 20 years? You want to rebut her accusations, do it, and do it in the strongest terms possible – but that kind of character assassination is unconscionable.

So, I am now painfully aware that you might see this an attack and just as easily use things I have confessed over the years to smear my name. Well, luckily I have never held myself up to be anyone’s role model.

The great majority of Scientologists I know are good people who are genuinely interested in improving conditions on this planet and helping others. I have to believe that if they knew what I now know, they too would be horrified. But I know how easy it was for me to defend our organization and dismiss our critics, without ever truly looking at what was being said; I did it for thirty-five years. And so, after writing this letter, I am fully aware that some of my friends may choose to no longer associate with me, or in some cases work with me. I will always take their calls, as I always took yours. However, I have finally come to the conclusion that I can no longer be a part of this group. Frankly, I had to look no further than your refusal to denounce the church’s anti-gay stance, and the indefensible actions, and inactions, of those who condone this behavior within the organization. I am only ashamed that I waited this many months to act. I hereby resign my membership in the Church of Scientology.

Sincerely,
Paul Haggis

I’d like to read somebody’s film school master’s thesis analyzing the Philosophy of Crash in light of Scientology’s core beliefs. One wonders how deeply 35 years of involvement with such a diabolically wacky organization would affect the creative outlook and output of one of it’s most prestigious members. For now, from me, all is forgiven. It’ll be fascinating to see where Paul Haggis goes from here, with his talent unchained from such nasty connections.

(Unless it gets taken down, all 5 parts of the ABC News special report on Scientology can be found here. Xenu willing.)

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • WhatsApp
  • Print
Tags: Paul HaggisScientology
Ryan Adams

Ryan Adams

Next Post

13 movies that creep me out & 13 more that weird me out

Sign up for Awards Daily's Breaking News

* indicates required

2021 Independent Spirit Award Winners – In Progress

2021 Independent Spirit Award Winners – In Progress
by Ryan Adams
April 22, 2021
0

Composer Joseph Trapanese Draws from Russian, Slavic Influences for Netflix’s ‘Shadow and Bone’

Composer Joseph Trapanese Draws from Russian, Slavic Influences for Netflix’s ‘Shadow and Bone’

SHADOW AND BONE (L to R) JESSIE MEI LI as ALINA STARKOV and BEN BARNES as THE DARKLING / GENERAL KIRIGAN in SHADOW AND BONE Cr. DAVID APPLEBY/NETFLIX © 2021

by Clarence Moye
April 22, 2021
0

Mark Johnson’s Good as Gold: The End of a Long, Strange Journey

Mark Johnson’s Good as Gold: The End of a Long, Strange Journey
by Mark Johnson
April 22, 2021
13

Final Ballot! 14th Annual Awards Daily Oscar Project

Final Ballot! 14th Annual Awards Daily Oscar Project
by Ryan Adams
April 22, 2021
21

Why I Watch the Oscars

Academy Reveals Poster Art for 93rd Oscars
by Sasha Stone
April 22, 2021
4

How Much Risk Do You Need to Take to Win Your Oscar Pool?

How Much Risk Do You Need to Take to Win Your Oscar Pool?
by Editor2
April 21, 2021
24

Cinematographer Ross Riege Approaches ‘Rutherford Falls’ with a Cinematic Eye

Cinematographer Ross Riege Approaches ‘Rutherford Falls’ with a Cinematic Eye

(Photo: Colleen Hayes/Peacock)

by Clarence Moye
April 21, 2021
0

The Public Still Cares About Movie Awards, They Just Can’t Stand the Politics

The Public Still Cares About Movie Awards, They Just Can’t Stand the Politics
by Sasha Stone
April 21, 2021
118

Let the Spirits Guide Us

Let the Spirits Guide Us
by Claudiu-Cristian Dobre
April 21, 2021
45

Art That Leaves a Mark – A Deep Dive into Mank

Art That Leaves a Mark – A Deep Dive into Mank
by Sasha Stone
April 20, 2021
3

Last Day of Voting – Dear Oscar, Hear My Plea

Best Actress — The Long Call of History Rises Again
by Sasha Stone
April 20, 2021
98

How Mank Emerges from the Shadows of Noir

How Mank Emerges from the Shadows of Noir
by Ryan Adams
April 21, 2021
62

The State of the Race: One More Day of Voting

The State of the Race: One More Day of Voting
by Sasha Stone
April 19, 2021
114

Join us Facebook

AwardsDaily Crew

  • About Us
  • Sasha Stone
  • Editor Ryan Adams
  • Clarence Moye
  • Contact Us

ADTV Crew

  • ADTV Home
  • Megan McLachlan, Co-Editor
  • Clarence Moye, Co-Editor
  • Jalal Haddad, Senior Contributor
  • Joey Moser, Senior Contributor
  • Shadan Larki
  • Ben Morris
  • David Phillips
  • Contact
  • About Us
  • Advertising on Awards Daily

© 1999-2021 AwardsDaily.com

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Oscar Ballot download
  • Good As Gold
  • AD TV
  • Podcasts
  • Interviews
  • All News

© 1999-2021 AwardsDaily.com