Jordan Peele’s debut film, Get Out, might be an achievement he never gets out from under. A modern-day horror masterpiece, Get Out is one of the single best directorial introductions of the 21st century. The movie would go on to receive Oscar nominations for Picture, Director, and Actor (Daniel Kaluuya). Peele won for his incredible Original Screenplay – becoming the first African American to win the Academy Award in this category. When something like this happens, the director’s subsequent films are often held to the same lofty expectations of their breakthrough work. Fair or unfair, this creates quite an obstacle for the rest of the director’s career.
Think back to 1999, when M. Night Shyamalan burst onto the scene with The Sixth Sense. Shyamalan was hailed as the new Alfred Hitchcock at the time, only to never quite live up to such towering accolades despite solid future entries like Unbreakable, Signs, The Village, and Split. Another example might be Neil Blomkamp, whose District 9 instantly became a visionary, sci-fi classic, only to see his future work – Elysium and Chappie – fail to live up to the hype. It is not that uncommon a thing, honestly.
Peele’s second film, Us, might be a good example of how prodigies don’t often become masters of their craft – at least not immediately. While Us was ambitious and imaginative, it didn’t score quite so well with audiences as it did critics, who might have been intimidated to report back anything lukewarm following Get Out’s incredible reception. While a good film, Us felt drowned in the anticipation we had following Get Out. Again, fair or unfair, this is the bar that was set for Peele, just as it was Shyamalan, Blomkamp, and many others before him who found immediate success with their debut effort.
In Nope, his third film, Jordan Peele entrances audiences once again with his beguiling style. Peele’s approach to the extraordinary happening to the ordinary is the same principle on which directors like Steven Spielberg and Alfred Hitchcock built their careers. Nope is Peele’s most accessible, audience-friendly film to date, dealing less with heavy, social metaphors (aside from men exploiting animals for labor and entertainment) and going straight for the popcorn jugular.
Nope takes place on a horse ranch in rural California owned by OJ (Kaluuya) and his sister Emerald (Keke Palmer). OJ is struggling to keep the ranch in business following the untimely and mysterious death of his father (the great Keith David). He keeps the homestead afloat by selling off his prized horses to Ricky (Steven Yeun), a child actor turned showman. As a young actor, Ricky witnessed Gordy, a trained chimp, debilitate and murder his co-stars on-set. As OJ deals with the bereavement of losing his father, he is drawn to a curious unidentified object in the skies above his ranch. The siblings – with the help of an electronic store clerk (Brandon Perea) and a legendary cinematographer (Michael Wincott) – attempt to make a fortune by capturing this slippery and fleeting object in the sky on film.
Nope is aptly crafted. Dazzling cinematography (Hoyte Van Hoytema), intense soundscape, first-rate production design (Ruth De Jong), and a heart-pounding score (Michael Abels) aid in the riveting effect the film has on its audience. Peele’s script unsurprisingly uses dry humor to cut moments of tension. This has become a staple of Peele’s films and when it works, it works well to engage and endear the audiences to his characters. When Peele overuses this approach, however, it can take away from the razor-sharp tension and deteriorate the scene.
Nope is at its best when it delivers tense, quiet moments: A brooding Kaluuya arches his neck to the side, standing in the middle of the desert road. He stares out at what appears to be a row of oncoming headlights. We watch his face grow from curiosity to suspicion to fear as he begins to realize things aren’t always what they seem. The hair on our neck stands straight up and our legs nervously begin to bounce in our seats as we wait for what comes next. That’s the magic of good filmmaking.
Nope is an entertaining flick that will take hold of audiences who are not looking for more than a good time at the theater. And while Get Out far exceeds his latest two films, there is clear and simmering talent behind the work of Jordan Peele. I enjoyed Nope for what it was and still believe Peele’s best film is yet to come.
I found Nope visually impressive, and the performances are lively and intriguing. Kaluuya’s brooding has dimensions this script doesn’t fully exploit. He deserves to be cast in plain old, unadorned serious drama. And Keke Palmer is delightful, fluent in her sprightly comic timing and assured in the graver moments, too.
But does the movie show us anything new? Does Peele as writer or director have a fresh take on alien invasion, family sorrow or courage? I saw stuff that jolted me, but little that genuinely, deeply surprised me.
My review is here:
https://moviestruck.substack.com/p/nope-2022
Well made, but certainly his worst. I wish I liked it more.
Looking forward to this, but I am beginning to fear that Peele may become the new Shyamalan, an incredibly talented filmmaker trapped by the expectations of his audience.
While initially underwhelmed by the film when the credits rolled in the theater, the more I thought about it, the more I liked it. I place it firmly ahead of Us and quite far behind Get Out (a true masterpiece). Nevertheless, I think the film is brilliant in its own nebulous way. Mark, I disagree with your assertion that Nope contains less social metaphors. Although these metaphors may not be as boldly stated as they are in his two previous films, nearly every scene and plot line contains sharp social commentary and metaphor. There’s a lot more going on in this movie than meets the eye. In fact, that’s Peele’s entire thesis. We’re so obsessed with the spectacle that we miss the deeper meaning and greater truth. This film is a meticulously crafted distillation of voyeurism, surveillance, spectacle, exploitation, the entertainment industry, social media, animal cruelty, man’s attempts to control Nature, race, the influence of technology, modern media and 24 hour news cycles, filmmaking as art form, capitalism, and consumption. Kudos to Jordan Peele for making smart, entertaining, original movies that make audiences think and discuss big ideas.
I agree completely. I think the mise en scene augmented the story of the struggling proletariat underclass, which brought the social thesis to full boil within the contextural framework of the analytical expose of what it means to develop the infrastructure in real time, and without the gamification we so often see in film, that underlines the bigger problem of ultimately how to get effective service in the food court without sacrificing what it means to be relevant.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/007744b48242aca886e68ab30745bf2025d872a043a433739ee966889532833b.gif
I hope he keeps making originals and never switches to the dark side. We need more like him.
on the other hand, he would be a daring and perfect choice to helm Marvel’s “Blade”
M. Night called. He wants his career back.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/8921bac02a2aa758b835ccc71ad0ec01eca656bbc0acbeb4f840950cad733bea.jpg
He’s SO talented as filmmaker… a pity he’s wasting his talent in the “twist ending” tricks…
The twist in The Sixth Sense saved the movie. Till the twist it was a well acted but a sluggish movie. I think that Unbreakable is his best movie followed by Split, Signs, Glass and The Visit.
Yes, remove the twist and The 6th Sense is just a good thriller… Unbreakable doesn’t even need that twist ending to be remarkable. But I think The 6th Sense is his 2nd best film, though
“Oh, hi, Mark.” Thanks for the review. I will probably see this on video since it looks interesting. Well-crafted is a word that I often use to describe something that I somewhat admire but don’t really love.