Quantcast

Poster Pair: The Curious Case of Benjamin Button

Posted by Ryan Adams On November - 16 - 2008


(click to enlarge)

After the tantalizing tease last week showing us a snapshot of the backwards-printed posters for The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, we now have this more gorgeous twosome for viewing in huge resolution. The high key lighting and total lack of back-lit illumination reminds me of the stark full-frontal photos of Richard Avedon. (You’d damn well better bring your inner glamor when you sit for a bare-bulb Avedon interrogation portrait.) The posters thankfully forgo sepia for the more gilded glow of a burnished coin — the golden ageless image of bas-relief royal medallions. Another striking thing these faces have in common with an Avedon power portrait is the intensity of their arresting gazes. The camera captures an unblinking confrontational challenge, yet hint at the warm promise of frank engagement — tentative lips on the very verge of expressing what’s going on in the mind behind the eyes. The title written in reverse on Brad Pitt’s page now makes deeper conceptual sense when paired with its reflective mirror image on Cate Blanchetts half of the duo. The dyptich is combined in a more typical but no less effective fusion after the cut.

| |

36 Responses for "Poster Pair: The Curious Case of Benjamin Button"

  1. Bill M. November 16th, 2008 at 10:03 am 1

    The 81st Best Picture!

  2. Wally November 16th, 2008 at 10:09 am 2

    AWFUL poster/s.

  3. cdmc November 16th, 2008 at 10:23 am 3

    Ewww…

  4. Critix November 16th, 2008 at 10:30 am 4

    LOL, Ryan. You’re making the posters sound much better than they look.

  5. Ryan Adams November 16th, 2008 at 10:30 am 5

    I think they’re simply elegant. No doubt these are not the last posters we’ll see for CCoBB before Christmas. This year more than ever before, movies come with a whole sheaf of artwork.

    These are great character banners and, for me, have the substantial weight of a first-class Interview magazine glamor shoot. If it’s not Avedon, it’s a remarkable evocation.

    I don’t know about the real-life colors of Cate’s and Brad’s eyes, but love how the shade is so close in the third poster that they could almost be interchangeable.

  6. Ryan Adams November 16th, 2008 at 10:32 am 6

    (ha, Critix. That’s my conniving little job. I can also make a poster sound much worse than it is — if I’m not too excited about the movie.)

  7. Guy Lodge November 16th, 2008 at 10:59 am 7

    I like the one of Blanchett more, principally for spooky games the lighting plays with the cheekbones, but I still think they could have done something a bit more daring with the design.

    And using the word “Life” is so banal — what film isn’t about “life” in some measure?

  8. AJ November 16th, 2008 at 11:43 am 8

    In the “pair” I saw which was actually a banner that looked like two movie posters together Christmas Day on Pitt’s half was backwards. Also it had the tag line(s) above Pitt it had “Life Can Only Be Understood Backward” and above Blanchett it had “It Must Be Lived Forward”

  9. Paul Outlaw November 16th, 2008 at 11:54 am 9

    It seems to me he is looking directly into the camera, while she is looking slightly upward, which makes them definitely not “mirror images”.

  10. Harry November 16th, 2008 at 12:04 pm 10

    I agree with GLodge, putting life behind the title is a bit tacky and makes the type seem too Hallmark greeting card for me. I like the images though.

  11. RichardA November 16th, 2008 at 12:31 pm 11

    Someone was playing with the contrast and saturation.

    Anyway, composition-wise, the poster reminds me of VCB where Cruz, ScarJo, and Bardem’s faces were on the edge of frame and there’s a big nothing in the middle (their bodies, really). Here, it’s just black space. Not feeling it.

  12. backto1960 November 16th, 2008 at 1:03 pm 12

    Never in my life did I expect to see a movie poster being analyzed in such a grand fashion…

    all I have to say is, stay away from the photoshop!!

  13. B. November 16th, 2008 at 1:04 pm 13

    “stark full-frontal photos”
    I won’t even mention my disappointment at what I thought those were! *giggle*

    p.s. posters are UGLY.

  14. Loyal November 16th, 2008 at 1:49 pm 14

    In a world that thrives on hyperbolic statements, somehow Ryan always manages to take things even further.

  15. backto1960 November 16th, 2008 at 3:08 pm 15

    This article epitomises verbosity at its finest…

    “The posters thankfully forgo sepia for the more gilded glow of a burnished coin — the golden ageless image of bas-relief royal medallions”

    “the title written in reverse on Brad Pitt’s page now makes deeper conceptual sense when paired with its reflective mirror image on Cate Blanchetts half of the duo.”

    LMAO!!

  16. Ryan B November 16th, 2008 at 3:36 pm 16

    Compositionwise, these are similar to the campaign for The Silence of the Lambs. One of his face, one of her face, one with them meeting in the center. The only thing missing is the moth.

    http://www.impawards.com/1991/silence_of_the_lambs_ver3.html

  17. Ryan Adams November 16th, 2008 at 3:50 pm 17

    You’re new around here, bt’60, so you don’t know that over-analyzing the living shit out of posters in heightened flamboyant terms is a tongue-in-cheek tradition we’ve had at AwardsDaily since this time last year.

    It’s a way to avoid the tedium of obediently posting marketing material by subverting or acknowledging whatever the superficial intentions the graphic designers may have had, and by wryly reading as much overwrought embellishment into their creations as their own sense of importance seems to demand.

    I know you prefer your analysis with emphasis on the anal, bt’60, but I’m not really writing with you as my target audience. You either get it, or you don’t. It’s meant to be arch, but whatever gets your ass laughed off, go for it.

    Where do you go to school? Just curious.

  18. backto1960 November 16th, 2008 at 3:53 pm 18

    @ Ryan Adams

    LMAO!!! I sense some anger.

  19. Ryan Adams November 16th, 2008 at 3:54 pm 19

    LMAO!!!
    You’ll know I’m angry when your comments start vanishing.

  20. Ryan Adams November 16th, 2008 at 3:55 pm 20

    Helluva nice catch, Ryan B.
    Bravo.

  21. backto1960 November 16th, 2008 at 4:01 pm 21

    @ ryan adams

    I guess your “well-liked” friends and you are opposed to the idea of me having an OPINION about the article huh? LMAO. The article reads like the overworked writing of a verbose pseudo-intellectual and ironic enough, you kinda sound like one.

    Now if you excuse me, I will “get my ass laughed off”….LMAO!!

  22. Andre November 16th, 2008 at 4:05 pm 22

    fight! fight! fight! fight! fight! fight! fight! fight! fight!

    c’mon folks, it’s just a movie poster, no point getting all worked up…

  23. filmboymichael November 16th, 2008 at 4:08 pm 23

    there is a difference between having a respectable opinion without being offensive. These forums are a healthy and fun way to discuss an art form that we are all passionate about. Backto1960, respect the other posters and maybe you will have that in return.

  24. filmboymichael November 16th, 2008 at 4:10 pm 24

    oh. and i think the posters have an ethereal lovlieness to them.

  25. Guy Lodge November 16th, 2008 at 4:21 pm 25

    So, a couple of three-syllable words apparently constitutes verbosity these days?

    (Oh dear, should I use a less verbose verb than “constitutes”? “Approximates”? “Equals”? Still too long? Somebody help me, please.)

    Loving your work, Ryan, in all its “pseudo-intellectual” glory. The web wants for eloquence these days.

    (PS. Why is everything branded “pseudo-intellectual” now? What happened to good, old-fashioned, vanilla “intellectualism”? Does anyone acknowledge the difference anymore? Somebody get me my cane so I can wave it feebly in the air.)

  26. RichardA November 16th, 2008 at 4:32 pm 26

    I do not like this posters for CCoBB. It says nothing much about the movie. And the faces were shot like a regular magazine cover, except a lot less attractive than they normally are.

    If they were relying on the face of Brad Pitt to sell the movie, couldn’t they pick a more attractive shot? At least one ab?

  27. Pumpkin November 16th, 2008 at 4:42 pm 27

    I’m not going to over-analyze these posters, but my gut reaction says, “meh.” Pitt’s looks like a drunk driving mug shot. And I fear people who are not that “into” movies–or this movie–or know the story of this movie– are going to think the posters are backwards by mistake and not on purpose.

  28. Ryan Adams November 16th, 2008 at 4:57 pm 28

    Thanks Guy. I can only quote Poet Laureate, Sarah Palin:

    “Befoulers of the Verbiage”

    It was an unfair attack on the verbiage
    That Senator McCain Ryan chose to use,
    Because the fundamentals,
    As he was having to explain afterwards,
    He means our workforce.
    He means the ingenuity of the American.
    And of course that is strong,
    And that is the foundation of our economy.
    So that was an unfair attack there,
    Again based on verbiage.

    Richard A, you scamp: “at least one ab?”
    ahaha!

  29. Ryan Adams November 16th, 2008 at 5:05 pm 29

    And I fear people who are not that “into” movies–or this movie–or know the story of this movie– are going to think the posters are backwards by mistake and not on purpose.

    Pumpkin, luckily for those people, Four Christmases will be playing further down the multiplex corridor.

  30. backto1960 November 16th, 2008 at 5:08 pm 30

    Brad Pitt’s abs are fine but poking fun at critics for licking Eastwood’s “ass” is intolerable….hypocrisy much?

    RichardA must be a “well liked” friend.

  31. Ryan Adams November 16th, 2008 at 5:18 pm 31

    Brad Pitt’s abs are more than fine, they’re foine.

    If you think that’s comparable to licking Eastwood’s ass you’re disinvited from the orgy.

    my god, bt’60. self-immolation much?

  32. backto1960 November 16th, 2008 at 6:27 pm 32

    fione? LMAO!! do I sense some smack of attitude in our resident pseudo-intellectual Ryan Adams? do I sense some oh-no-you-didn’t personality?

    This is the problem with verbosity, you miss out on the simpler aspects. I am not comparing Brad pitt’s abs to licking Eastwood’s ass. The comment about licking Eastwood’s ass wasn’t literal. It was in reference to a comment like kissing someone’s else or sucking up to someone. I was referring to critics who kiss Eastwood’s ass hence licking his ass. Thus, I find it hypocritical that I would be chastised for speaking figuratively yet it’s ok for you to rave about pitt’s abs. With all the constant elaborations, it’s starting to feel like I’m talking with an infant…who happens to use big words. I personally think Brad Pitt is overrated, acting and look-wise.

    …I also noticed you edited your comment. From lunch puking to being disinvited from the orgy. I wonder why!

  33. Sasha Stone November 16th, 2008 at 6:38 pm 33

    Back to 1960 you remind me of Mario Borroto. You aren’t, by chance, one in the same? Ryan is a particularly talented writer, one of the best I’ve ever read and we’re lucky to have him while we have him.

  34. backto1960 November 16th, 2008 at 6:41 pm 34

    @ sasha stone

    No, I am not Mario boroto and I also think Ryan Adams is a great and talented writer.

  35. Pumpkin November 16th, 2008 at 7:55 pm 35

    “Pumpkin, luckily for those people, Four Christmases will be playing further down the multiplex corridor.”

    Very true, Ryan.

  36. Glenn November 16th, 2008 at 9:00 pm 36

    They’re duds. Nothing even remotely special about them, Pitt looks like he’s taking a mug shot, the use of “Life” in that cliche font is nauseating and, most importantly, it doesn’t have ANYTHING to do with what the movie is about. It doesn’t express one iota of anything about the film. It may as well be two paparazzi photos rejiggered on photoshop.


Leave a reply


  • Contender Tracker

    Best Picture
    Up in the Air
    Nine
    The Hurt Locker
    An Education
    Precious: Based on the Novel
    Push by Sapphire

    A Serious Man
    Inglourious Basterds
    Up

    Julie & Julia
    Star Trek
    District 9
    Bright Star
    Where the Wild Things Are
    A Single Man

    Best Actor
    Jeff Bridges, Crazy Heart
    Colin Firth, A Single Man
    George Clooney, Up in the Air
    Matt Damon, The Informant!
    Jeremy Renner, The Hurt Locker
    Viggo Mortensen, The Road
    Ben Foster, The Messenger
    Michael Stuhlbarg, A Serious Man
    Michael Sheen, The Damned United

    Best Actress
    Gabby Sidibe, Precious
    Carey Mulligan, An Education
    Meryl Streep, Julie & Julia
    Abbie Cornish, Bright Star
    Helen Mirren, The Last Station
    Michelle Monaghan, Trucker

    Best Supporting Actor
    Christoph Waltz, Inglourious Basterds
    Alfred Molina, An Education
    Stanley Tucci, Julie & Julia
    Peter Sarsgaard, An Education
    Robert Duvall, Crazy Heart
    Peter Capaldi, In the Loop
    Zach Galifianakis, The Hangover
    Anthony Mackie, The Hurt Locker
    Brian Geraghty, The Hurt Locker

    Best Supporting Actress
    Mo'Nique,Precious
    Anna Kendrick,Up in the Air
    Maggie Gyllenhaal, Crazy Heart
    Julianne Moore, A Single Man
    Melanie Laurent, Inglourious Basterds
    Vera Farmiga, Up in the Air
    Samantha Morton, The Messenger
    Emma Thompson, An Education
    Cara Seymour, An Education

    Best Director
    Jason Reitman, Up in the Air
    Lee Daniels, Precious
    Kathryn Bigelow, The Hurt Locker
    Lone Scherfig, An Education
    Quentin Tarantino, Inglourious Basterds
    Joel and Ethan Coen, A Serious Man
    Neill Blomkamp, District 9
    Spike Jonze, Where the Wild Things Are
    Tom Ford, A Single Man
    Jane Campion, Bright Star

    Best Original Screenplay
    Mark Boal, The Hurt Locker
    Joel and Ethan Coen, A Serious Man
    Jane Campion, Bright Star
    Quentin Tarantino,Inglourious Basterds
    Michael Haneke,White Ribbon
    Bob Peterson, Pete Docter,Up
    Scott Neustadter, Michael H. Weber, 500 Days of Summer

    Best Adapted Screenplay
    Jason Reitman, Sheldon Turner, Up in the Air
    Nick Hornby, An Education
    Spike Jonze, Dave Eggars, Where the Wild Things Are
    Peter Morgan, The Damned United
    Geoffrey Fletcher, Precious: Based on the Novel Push by Sapphire
    Scott Burns, The Informant!
    Tom Ford, A Single Man

    Best Editing

    Chris Innis, Bob Murawski, The Hurt Locker
    Sally Menke, Inglourious Basterds
    Dana E. Glauberman,, Up in the Air
    Joel and Ethan Coen,, A Serious Man

    Best Cinematography
    Greig Fraser,Bright Star
    Robert Richardson,Inglourious Basterds
    Roger Deakins, A Serious Man
    Christian Berger, White Ribbon
    Bruno Delbonnel,Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
    Barry Ackroyd, The Hurt Locker

    Best Art Direction

    Where the Wild Things Are
    Julie & Julia
    Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
    Bright Star
    Inglourious Basterds
    White Ribbon
    District 9
    A Serious Man

    Best Sound Mixing

    Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
    District 9
    Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
    The Hurt Locker
    Star Trek

    Best Sound Editing

    District 9
    Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
    Star Trek
    Up

    Best Costume Design
    Janet Patterson, Bright Star
    Jany Temime,Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince
    Anna B. Sheppard,Inglourious Basterds
    Mary Zophre, A Serious Man
    Colleen Atwood, Public Enemies
    Consolata Boyle,Cheri

    Best Original Score
    Carter Burwell, Karen O,Where the Wild Things Are
    Carter Burwell,A Serious Man
    Michael Giacchino,Up
    Alexandre Desplat, Cheri
    Elliot Goldenthal, Public Enemies

    Best Foreign Language Film (submissions)

    Letters from Father Jacob, Finland
    White Wedding, South Africa
    A Prophet, France
    Dawson, Isla 10, Chile
    Nobody to Watch Over Me, Japan
    Prince of Tears, Hong Kong
    No puedo vivir sin ti, Taiwan
    Kelin, Kazakhstan
    Mother, Korea
    The White Ribbon, Germany
    Silent Army, The Netherlands


    Best Documentary Feature

    The Beaches of Agnes
    Burma VJ
    The Cove
    Every Little Step
    Facing Ali
    Food, Inc.
    Garbage Dreams
    Living in Emergency
    The Most Dangerous Man in America
    Mugabe and the White African
    Sergio
    Soundtrack for a Revolution
    Under Our Skin
    Valentino
    Which Way Home


    Best Animated Feature
    Up
    The Princess and the Frog
    Coraline
    The Fantastic Mr. Fox
    A Christmas Carol
    Mary and Max
    Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs
    Ponyo


    Best Visual Effects
    Star Trek
    District 9
    A Christmas Carol
    Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
    Transformers


    Best Makeup

    Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
    District 9

    Best Song

    Best Live Action Short

    Best Animated Short

    Best Documentary Short

    China’s Unnatural Disaster: The Tears of Sichuan Province
    The Last Campaign of Governor Booth Gardner
    The Last Truck: Closing of a GM Plant
    Lt. Watada
    Music by Prudence
    Rabbit a la Berlin
    Tell Them Anything You Want: A Portrait of Maurice Sendak
    Woman Rebel

  • Ampas Breakdown

    Actors-1,222
    Producers-462
    Executives-436
    Sound-411
    Writers-388
    Art Directors-373
    Directors-375
    Public Relations-370
    Members at Large-254
    Shorts/Feature Ani-335
    Visual Effects-272
    Music-233
    Editors-227
    Cinematographers-197
    Documentary-145
    Makeup-115
    Total Voting Members -approx 6,000
  • Tuesday, December 1, 2009: Official Screen Credits forms due

    Monday, December 28, 2009: Nominations ballots mailed

    Saturday, January 23, 2010: Nominations polls close 5 p.m. PT

    Tuesday, February 2, 2010: Nominations announced 5:30 a.m. PT, Samuel Goldwyn Theater

    Wednesday, February 10, 2010: Final ballots mailed

    Monday, February 15, 2010: Nominees Luncheon

    Saturday, February 20, 2010: Scientific and Technical Achievement Awards presentation

    Tuesday, March 2, 2010: Final polls close 5 p.m. PT

    Sunday, March 7, 2010: 82nd Annual Academy Awards presentation